The latest attempt to control the internet is just more evidence the-powers-that-be never really understood it.
KIT KNIGHTLY
Friday, the “Age Verification” clause of the UK’s Online Safety Act officially came into force. The result was a sudden surge in discussion, and a lot of people realising – finally – what the law really means.
People have been googling “VPN” a lot. That’s a good thing; we’ll get to why later.
Unfortunately, much of this is stable doors and bolted horses. We’ve been warning about the OSA since it was first mooted (by the Conservatives, just to remind you that “sides” are an illusion), and we’re rather past the point where awareness would have mattered.
The new law essentially forces companies to put any even potentially “adult content” behind an ID wall – meaning a user must prove their age before they access it. The ways of doing that vary; you can use a credit card or let an AI-powered system scan your face via webcam to guess your age.
Don’t worry, it won’t store the data, and it’s only guessing your age, not scanning your face and uploading it to some data storage centre. They promised they wouldn’t do that.
The really vital part here is what exactly “adult content” means. It evokes – and is indeed intended to evoke – pornography. The act was sold as a tool to prevent children from accessing the near-infinite amounts of porn scattered across the web, but pornography is the least of it.
“Adult content” can also mean violence, suicide, animal cruelty, war, drugs…or any news coverage and/or discussion of the same. It could also mean “conspiracy theories”, especially those which could “expose children to harm”, like anti-vaccine sentiment, or cause “radicalization”.
In fact, it can potentially mean anything it is required to mean, which is exactly the kind of thing they LOVE to put in new laws.
But I don’t want to rehash these points here. You can read our previous coverage of it HERE HERE HERE and HERE.
Today I want to talk about how the OSA is going to spread, and why it might not matter if it does.
Over the weekend, it was widely noted on Twitter/X that Elon Musk’s platform was putting EU-based users behind the age restriction, not just British ones. People made jokes that the US-based platform couldn’t differentiate between the UK and Europe.
Far more likely, they are preparing for when the EU launches its own age verification scheme in the near future.
Australia, as they so often do, started this totalitarian ball rolling back in the Spring (we covered that here). Ireland followed suit earlier this month. Canada and Mexico aren’t far behind. The US’s “Kids Online Safety Act” (KOSA) is moving forward more slowly, but only the most optimistic would bet against it passing eventually.
The trend is as predictable as it was inevitable.
We must ask, yet again, what is the functional difference between a one-world government and 197 near-identical national governments? The answer is as close to “nothing” as makes no difference.
That is the current model for global rule. A hundred hydra heads pretending the body they’re all attached to doesn’t exist.
And this hydra really, REALLY wants to control the internet.
The good news, at least in my opinion, is that I don’t think they can. I don’t think it will work.
Well…in one way it will.
It will normalize people handing over IDs and asking permission. It will further accustom people to the idea that the government is looking over their shoulder, and further ingrain all the habits of self-moderation and internal censorship that dictates.
There’s nothing you can do about that, except to nudge people and remind them “this is not normal”. Whatever the counter of “normalization” is (Anti-normalization? Weirdening?)
But that’s only half of it, the psycho-social half. The other half – actually controlling the internet – I don’t think they’re capable of achieving it. I’m not even sure it’s possible.
I don’t believe the internet is capable of being controlled in the way they are seeking to control it, I don’t think the establishment knew, for one second, what they were unleashing when they made access to it so widely available, and I don’t think they would ever have birthed this monster if they had known.
And I think they have been playing catch-up ever since.
This lack of understanding of the internet is displayed in comical and trivial terms fairly routinely. Consider the viral video of a CNN anchor asking “who is this 4chan?” or David Cameron’s solemn pledge to ban encryption (which is almost impossible).
They just don’t get it.
Let’s take these age verification measures as an example. We already mentioned that people are simply using VPNs to get around them. There’s talk of the government banning VPNs in response (unlikely) or making them “register” with the government (more likely), but that typifies the failings of imagination and approach that make it so unlikely they could ever fully succeed.
They are always reacting. Plugging leaks and whacking moles. They lag behind.
People still torrent. Piratebay was shut down fifty thousand times. It’s still there. If one day it isn’t, something else will be.
There will likely be a dozen ways to circumvent the age verification system within a few weeks of it being implemented. It will be only slightly slower than 17-year-olds realizing they can just click the “I’m over 18” button.
The internet evolves. It is dynamic and organic. When one route is blocked, informal armies of thousands of anonymous intelligences cloud-compute workarounds.
I’m not saying everything is fine. I’m not doing the negative panic meme…
…at least, I don’t think I am.
The OSA, and all the other acts like it, are terrible. They enable censorship and demand surveillance. They make the environment more hostile, but not unlivable. While they are clearly a threat…I just can’t see them as existential one.
I might be wrong. I might just be in a good mood and seeing ice cream castles in the air.
For now, I’d download Tor while you can. And then whatever replaces Tor should it get banned or bought or compromised. That’s just the way the internet works. And fortunately for us, this is something the powers that be have never really understood.
This article (Why the UK’s age verification system (probably) won’t work) was created and published by off Guardian and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Kit Knightly
See Related Article Below
Reform UK Vows to Repeal New Online Censorship Law
Farage’s free speech crusade pivots Reform’s crime briefing into a full-throated attack on digital censorship.
CINDY HARPER
The political party Reform UK has declared its intent to repeal the Online Safety Act, warning that the law grants excessive powers to regulators and poses a serious threat to free speech.
The party claims the legislation, which recently came into force, is presented as a safety measure but in reality undermines civil liberties.
Although the event was announced as a discussion on crime, Reform leader Nigel Farage and his adviser Zia Yusuf devoted most of their Westminster press conference to attacking the legislation.
Their concerns centered on the way the act targets social media platforms and expands the role of the media regulator, Ofcom.
Yusuf, a former party chair who now leads Reform’s efforts on local council reform, said the law was a vast overreach. He warned that it hands regulators the power to pressure platforms into silencing views that challenge the government. According to Yusuf, even companies known for tolerating broad speech would be forced to restrict political discourse.
“So much of the act is massive overreach and plunges this country into a borderline dystopian state,” Yusuf said.
He argued that the legislation uses safety as a cover to expand state control. “Any student of history will know that the way countries slip into this sort of authoritarian regime is through legislation that cloaks tyranny inside the warm fuzz of safety and security and hopes nobody reads the small print.”
Reform UK promised to eliminate the act entirely if it came to power.
Yusuf dismissed tools like age verification as ineffective, claiming children could simply use VPNs to bypass restrictions.
Farage also admitted the party doesn’t have all the answers yet, but insisted they are working with leading technology experts. “Can I stand here and say that we have a perfect answer for you right now? No,” he said. “Can I say that as a party, we have more access to some of the best tech brains, not just in the country, but in the world? That I can say to you.”
Labour leader Keir Starmer responded to questions about the act while in Scotland ahead of a meeting with President Donald Trump, and flat out lied in his denial that the government was censoring people.
SOURCE: Reclaim the Net
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply