JOANNA GRAY
Pity the schoolchildren who are returning to their prison camps this September. Most will now be entering premises entirely surrounded with high security fences, a rapid development that has spread across the country in the past year. In another punishment beating in the national demoralisation campaign, school security is a tragic indicator of a society gone wrong.
Updated on July 12th 2024, the Department for Education’s ‘School and College Security’ has caused a rush of previously pleasant schools being fenced off with ugly metal structures and keypad entry – another win for Bridget Phillipson and Britain’s low trust society. High security in London secondaries has been the case for years, but is a new sadness for quiet market towns and otherwise peaceful Cathedral cities.
The guidance reads:
The boundary is the first line of defence and should be protected with a secure fence or railings such as Weldmesh fencing to BS1722 or expanded metal or railings over 2.0m high.
Gates should be the same height as the fencing, fitted with anti-lift hinges, locking mechanisms that do not aid climbing and secured using an approved locking mechanism.
Planting close to the base of a fence can also be a deterrent but should not exceed 1.0m in height. Tree canopies should fall no lower than 2.0m from the ground to provide clear lines of sight.
I look at the beautiful Georgian building in our town that used to house the old Grammar school and compare it with the newly-security-fenced, largely 1960s secondary and feel utter misery. Gone are the days of nipping into the reception to collect a poorly child or drop off a forgotten violin. Instead, parents wait outside the security fence for a reluctant receptionist – no doubt furious at having to press the button release for the nth time that day – to let them in. The parent/delivery driver/pupil who has had to visit the orthodontist/visiting speaker/supply teacher, becomes just a dab more diminished at being treated like a potential maniac who needs restraining behind a two-metre-high fence.
After teaching an after-school confidence club in a sea-side town last term, I was walked back to reception by a couple of pupils to return my lanyard. The reception was closed so I left my lanyard on the desk and made my own way out. But the fenced exit was locked. Eventually a pupil (who knew the code that only the teachers are supposed to use) let me out. Freedom! Except this school had a double security fence so I was trapped in-between both. Eventually a group of cleaners arrived and I was let out. What does this level of security do to a child’s sense of confidence when used every day? Reassuring, infuriating or frightening? All three?
Not only has school security ramped up in the fence department – but – good news – lockdown drills are now also a feature of school life in Britain 2025! A cheerful 63-page guidance document from April 2025, ‘Protective security and preparedness for education settings‘ advises schools to practice lockdown protocols and encourages schools to have a “Public Access Trauma first aid kit (PAcT) – a first aid kit which supports the treatment of immediate, life-threatening injuries”. Children are forced to imagine a terrorist or gunman shooting up the school. All over Britain last year, secondary school and college children experienced lockdown drills where alarms sounded, doors were bolted and they hid under their desks. They will be doing so again this school year in order to fulfil the advice that “a rolling programme of testing and exercising is recommended to ensure your setting remains as prepared as possible”. Lucky them.
There seem to be only three ‘safeguarding’ motivations for such high security fences and lockdown drills – all of them bad.
- Britain’s terrorist threat has reached such a peak that our schoolchildren are actually at risk and such high security is vitally necessary.
- Safetyism – Britain’s terrorist threat and violence towards school children is low, but the culture of ‘better be safe than sorry’ has pervaded all aspects of public life.
- Pupil absence – with around 20% of pupils persistently absent from school, perhaps the fences are needed to prevent them wandering off site and back home?
Whatever is the reason behind all of this, our once high trust society is no more. The saddest thing is that a generation of pupils educated in such high-security surrounds, will not appreciate there was once another, better way.
Joanna Gray is a writer and confidence coach. She is looking for a publisher for FLOURISH: How to Help the Digital Generation Leave Home and Live Happy and Prosperous Lives. Please get in touch if interested.
This article (Why Do Schools Now Resemble Prisons?) was created and published by The Daily Sceptic and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Joanna Gray
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply