HE’LL DO IT FOR NARNIA FIRST!
PAUL SUTTON
Sir Keith Starmer (‘Keir Starmer’s a rent boy’, from the march) is about to reward Hamas and recognize Palestinian statehood.
But this isn’t a post about the Middle East, today’s Balkans in its intractability. It’s a simple question: When will Starmer recognize British sovereignty?
- He believes ‘international law’ reigns supreme over every aspect of our lives, even if (especially if) it conflicts with British interests. He positively revels in damaging those, by asserting that necessity, even though international law is a fantasy, instantly ignored by any and every country (bar us) when they need to.The Chagos deal is an exemplar – costing us perhaps £90bn, to damage British interests, though Starmer/Hermer/other corrupt lawyers may personally have been enriched for this treachery.
- We have thousands of criminals arriving every week, none of them ‘refugees’, since all are entering illegally from a safe country – albeit France. But due to his complete refusal to act in the national interest, he won’t secure our borders. He’s terrified about ‘breaking international law’. Every one of the major EU countries is doing that, without global apocalypse and the four horse-riders thundering into view.
- His Attorney General provided/provides free legal advice to ‘refugees’ on how to subvert ‘human rights’ law and stay here.
- Keith himself wrote the how-to legal pamphlet, on this con-job. So he’s behind Albanian drug dealers not being deported, because their kids prefer British chicken nuggets (no, not satire). Or an Afghan child rapist staying here because Afghan society isn’t safe for someone with his tendencies. It’s a matter of public record then, that both Starmer and Hermer approve of these absurdities and have directly facilitated them.
- Starmer’s government is legally on record as saying that the ‘rights’ of illegal entrants are more important than those of local people, if they object to unvetted illegal migrants being housed near them. The Home Secretary – Yvette Balls – said exactly this. Small wonder Labour are polling 16%; hence their need to import these foreign voters.
- Starmer worked with the EU side, during the ‘Brexit negotiations’, to ensure Britain was shafted. He advised them (along with Blair) on how to ‘leverage’ the Northern Ireland conflict, so putting British lives at risk, without a second thought.
- Keith anyway campaigned to tear up the 2016 Referendum result, since he didn’t like it. A result which favoured British sovereignty over some supranational version was inherently wrong, to this priggish ideologue. There are no circumstances – either contemporary or historical – in which he’d deviate from that position. Because it’s about his own vanity and sense of moral superiority.
With friends like this, even Hamas had better be wary. They shouldn’t trust this snake. Actually, that’s unfair on reptiles! There’s an ancient saying – one I can use without fear of being cancelled – since I’m half Greek: ‘Trust a snake before a Jew, a Jew before a Greek, a Greek before an Armenian, but don’t trust Keith Starmer.’
This article (WHEN WILL STARMER RECOGNIZE BRITISH STATEHOOD?) was created and published by Paul Sutton and is republished here under “Fair Use”
See Related Article Below
Starmer’s Reckless Betrayal of Britain: An Embarrassment, a Danger — He Must Resign
CP
There are errors in politics, there are misjudgements, and then there is the catastrophic folly that Keir Starmer has just foisted upon Britain and the Middle East.
By rushing headlong to recognise a Palestinian state, he has torn up decades of careful diplomacy, spat on the Oslo framework, rewarded terror, and imperilled Britain’s standing in the world. It is, to put it plainly, madness.
Consider the timing. Barely two years on from Hamas’s pogrom of October 7 (the slaughter of 1,200 innocents, the rape, the mutilations, the hostages dragged into tunnels) Starmer has chosen to send the message that such barbarism pays dividends. No hostage releases, no renunciation of terror, no demilitarisation, no reforms demanded of the Palestinian Authority. Nothing. A blank cheque. He has written across the diplomatic sky: violence works.
Britain’s foreign policy tradition has long been one of tough-minded even-handedness. We were guarantors of Oslo, brokers of balance. But Starmer, desperate to appease the howling anti-Israel faction on his backbenches, has junked principle for expedience. This is not diplomacy; it is political survival dressed up as moral courage.
Let us be clear: Hamas is strengthened, the corrupt Palestinian Authority is entrenched, and Israel, our democratic ally and security partner, is humiliated. Moderate Arab states, who have in recent years edged closer to peace with Israel, now see Britain not as a reliable friend but as a nation cowed by extremists at home. And across the Atlantic, Starmer has put Britain squarely at odds with Washington, even under a Democratic president.
The consequences are dire. If recognition comes without conditions, then the incentive for negotiation vanishes. Why bargain over land, borders, or security if sovereignty is simply handed out as a consolation prize? Why reform when corruption and repression are met with rewards? This is not peace-building, it is sabotage. It is like shipping a rocket before testing the engines: the thing will blow up on the launchpad, and ordinary people will pay the price.
But this betrayal is only the latest in a growing catalogue of blunders from a Prime Minister who seems intent on dismantling Britain piece by piece. From his reckless decision to hand away the Chagos Islands, strategic British territory given up for nothing AND sending Mauritius over £40 billion in taxpayers’ money in the process. It’s madness. Starmer governs with the recklessness of a man who knows he’ll never have to pay the bill. He taxes businesses to the hilt, strangles farmers with red tape, and drives pubs, industries, and entire livelihoods to the wall. Week by week, in what we have come to call Clowning Street, his government piles error upon error, blunder upon blunder, leaving ordinary Britons poorer, weaker, and less free.
Starmer’s moves are not merely wrong-headed. They are reckless, dangerous, and beneath the dignity of a Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. No sane person in this country can now look upon him as a trustworthy steward of our national interests. He has betrayed our allies, imperilled our security, and disfigured Britain’s reputation.
Keir Starmer has shown himself a man willing to sacrifice principle, stability, and truth for a cheap round of applause from his fellow socialists and those who hate Britain. That is not leadership; it is cowardice. It is appeasement. And it is intolerable.
Britain cannot be led by such a man. He is a danger to our country, to our alliances, and to the fragile hope of peace itself. Starmer must go.
By Claire Bullivant
This article (Starmer’s Reckless Betrayal of Britain: An Embarrassment, a Danger — He Must Resign) was created and published by Conservative Post and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author CP
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply