“Battlelines for a new world order based on power are being drawn right now.”
EPP TUUL
Continuing with the Green Deal and developing e-cars with tax money, age restrictions on social media, an even tougher fight against fake news, and preparing for a global health crisis. Alongside this, there is also the digital euro and European AI Gigafactories. These are the visions for the future that European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen outlined in her speech on Wednesday.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said that Europe is currently fighting for integrity, peace, freedom, and independence, even though fundamentally the union is a peace project. “This summer showed us that there is simply no room or time for nostalgia. Battlelines for a new world order based on power are being drawn right now,” von der Leyen described the current situation to the parliament.
According to the President of the European Commission (EC), Europe as a whole must therefore fight for its place in the world. However, this fight does not mean a change of direction compared to the previous policy – according to her, climate policy, or the Green Deal, which some argue hinders economic development, must continue. In her opinion, more vigorous efforts should also be made to combat fake news, by investing money in the media and creating resilience programs. Such plans require various strategies, laws and requirements, that is, even more regulations, as well as sustainability and resilience centers, that is, even greater costs for European taxpayers, who are already struggling financially.
“And we must stay the course on our climate and environmental goals.”
According to von der Leyen, Europe is firmly on track to meet the Green Deal’s 2030 target of reducing emissions by at least 55%. According to the president, we must remain committed to these climate and environmental goals. “The science is crystal clear,” the politician confirmed, adding: “And the economic and security case is equally compelling.”
She made this statement despite the fact that she herself was forced to admit to the same parliament that Europeans’ costs have risen and people are making sacrifices to make ends meet. However, according to her, European authorities have made considerable efforts: “So at the height of the energy crisis in the last years, Europe acted. And thanks to that common effort, we quickly managed to stabilise prices and secure supply. We are now on the path to energy independence,” said the president, although she acknowledged that energy prices remain too high and are a constant source of concern for citizens and businesses.
Of course, the president did not acknowledge that the European Union’s costly climate policy and unrealistic requirements are what is behind the high energy prices (we have discussed these issues in depth here, here, here, here and here). On the contrary, according to von der Leyen, dependence on Russia is solely to blame for the energy crisis. Therefore, in her words, it is now high time to “get rid of dirty Russian fossil fuels.” Von der Leyen also reiterated her firm belief that energy prices will be lowered by so-called clean domestic energy, that is, solar panels and wind turbines, which have to increase. However, such claims are easily refuted when looking at the price of electricity in Germany, for example, which has invested heavily in wind and solar energy. The addition of unstable wind and solar energy to the grid is also causing increasing problems for grid operators, which can result in major power outages, as happened in Spain and Portugal at the end of April. According to von der Leyen, Europe faces the challenge of investing even more in so-called clean energy infrastructure and networks, building them faster and creating Energy Highways.
Von der Leyen said that the Commission has also made a proposal for the 2040 targets, and although many are concerned about the scale of the task, the president reassures us that “the transition must support people and strengthen industry.” Public and private sectors alike need to invest more, and the EU plans to create a functioning circular economy, and lead markets for environmentally friendly products. To ensure a fair transition, there are plans to create a Social Climate Fund, and the promotion of carbon pricing around the world should secure a global level playing field. However, the fact remains that only Europe has imposed a high tax on CO₂, and the rest of the world has not followed suit, which means that now Europe isn’t able to remain competitive.
“I believe Europe should have its own E-car.”
The automotive industry is tightly linked to climate policy, with car manufacturers considering the requirements for an electric future to be unrealistic and the benefits of electric cars to be overstated (see, for example, here, here, here, here and here). Von der Leyen did not ignore the automotive industry in her speech and considers it to be the cornerstone of the European economy and industry, and the pride of Europe. However, her political plan stands in stark contrast to the assessment of car manufacturers.
“And millions of Europeans want to buy affordable European cars. So we should also invest in small, affordable vehicles. Both for the European market, but also to meet the surge in global demand,” said von der Leyen. However, since affordable vehicles, especially electric cars, are still a rarity in Europe (see, for example, here, here and here), the Commission intends to launch a project for small, affordable cars. “I believe Europe should have its own E-car,” said the politician, emphasizing: “E for environmental – clean, efficient and lightweight. E for economical – affordable for people. E for European – built here in Europe, with European supply chains.” The Commission President is certain that China must not be allowed to conquer this market, because “no matter what, the future is electric, and Europe will be part of it.”
Europe needs an Anti-Poverty Strategy, a Quality Jobs Act, and an Affordable Housing Plan.
When it comes to poverty, the Commission President says that energy prices, which have already been addressed, are important, but so are jobs, people and their livelihoods, and empowered workers. There are several ambitious documents planned to improve the labour market: the European Anti-Poverty Strategy and the Quality Jobs Act. The first would set out the steps to be taken by Member States until 2050 and help protect children from poverty by outlining measures to ensure affordability and the cost of living. The second would “ensure that modern employment keeps pace with the modern economy”.
Housing has also become a source of concern for many Europeans. “House prices are up by more than 20% since 2015. Building permits down by over 20% in five years,” the president lamented. In her view, this is no longer just a housing crisis, but a “social crisis” that is undermining Europe’s social structure, cohesion, and competitiveness. “Nurses, teachers, and firemen cannot afford to live where they serve. Students drop out because they cannot pay the rent. Young people delay starting families,” von der Leyen described.
To address housing concerns, the Commission plans to launch a European Affordable Housing Plan, which would make housing more affordable, sustainable, and of higher quality. According to the Commission President, State aid rules need to be changed to enable housing support measures, simplify the construction of new houses and student apartments, and propose a legal initiative on short-term rentals. The only question that remains is how will the plan fits with climate targets, as the commitment to reduce carbon dioxide emissions suggests that the future looks rather challenging in cold regions. Energy efficiency requirements in the form of renovation obligations and permitted types of heating do not bode well for affordable housing.
Europe is on the brink of a global health crisis, democracy is under attack, and we need to fight misinformation more effectively
According to von der Leyen, Europe is on the brink of a new global health crisis, or perhaps it has already begun. But the most serious problem for her is misinformation, which threatens the world’s progress in combating serious diseases, from measles to polio. It is important to note, of course, that the authorities’ approach to misinformation in the context of the coronavirus crisis does not mean that they actually combated misinformation, but rather that facts that were, for some reason, unwelcome to the authorities were also labeled as false. In any case, von der Leyen’s solution to combating this so-called misinformation is the Global Health Resilience Initiative, which Europe intends to lead.
In addition to health information, von der Leyen believes that democracy in general is under attack – manipulated information and misinformation divide societies and undermine trust in the truth. Here, the Commission President believes that Europe urgently needs a European Democracy Shield and greater capacity to monitor and detect information manipulation and disinformation. Implementing this program will, of course, require the creation of yet another European Union agency – the European Center for Democratic Resilience. Based on the limited information currently available, this could be compared to the UK communications regulator Ofcom, which is also actively combating misinformation and prioritises protecting children in its stated objectives (see also here and here).
Von der Leyen specifically pointed out that traditional media outlets are struggling in many EU countries. This has created many news deserts, where disinformation spreads and this is extremely dangerous for democracy. “And when independent media are dismantled or neutralised, our ability to monitor corruption and preserve democracy is severely weakened,” von der Leyen said, adding: “This is why the first step in an autocrat’s playbook is always to capture independent media. Because this enables backsliding and corruption to happen in the dark.” In any case, von der Leyen believes that the EU must do much more to protect the media and independent press, and to this end, it plans to launch a Media Resilience Program that supports journalism and media literacy and through which the EC can channel significant funds into the media. At this point, however, it is appropriate to recall the stories we have previously discussed as a kind of taboo topics in Europe (e.g. immigration, the origin of the coronavirus, the safety of vaccination, etc.), where the media often contribute to limiting opinions, false-checking facts, and amplifying cancellation (see, for example, here, here, here).
“Our friends in Australia are pioneering a social media restriction.”
Von der Leyen also addressed social media in more detail in her speech, primarily focusing on children’s unrestricted access. “As a mother of seven and grandmother of four, I feel anxious for parents who are doing their best to protect their children. These parents worry that when their children pick up a phone, they may be exposed to a wide range of dangers just by scrolling through the screen,” von der Leyen explained. As examples, the politician cited online bullying, access to adult content, self-harm propaganda, and algorithms that seek to create addiction in children.
“Just as in my youth, we as a society taught children not to smoke, drink, or view adult content before a certain age. I believe it is time to consider doing the same with social media. Our friends in Australia are pioneers in restricting social media,” said von der Leyen. She confirmed that she is closely monitoring Australia’s example to determine Europe’s next steps and promised a preliminary plan by the end of the year. Indeed, there are now similar examples of age verification elsewhere, and trials are also being conducted in European countries.
There are no plans to restrict immigration, but it is necessary to restrict the work of human traffickers
The last topic addressed by Ursula von der Leyen, and which can therefore be considered the least prioritised, was immigration. She emphasised the need to triple funding for migration and border management in the next budget. “The people of Europe have shown that they are willing to help those fleeing war and persecution,” said the EC President, but public frustration grows when the rules are not followed. Von der Leyen therefore considers it crucial that if someone is denied asylum, their return must be taken seriously, and the migration and asylum pact must be fully implemented. According to the politician, Europe must decide who comes here and under what conditions, not human traffickers and smugglers. The latter’s business model must be dismantled, and the EU needs a new sanctions regime targeting human traffickers and smugglers to freeze their assets, restrict their movements, and cut their profits. However, Ursula von der Leyen did not address other problems associated with immigration, such as increased crime, difficulties with school slots and accommodation, immigration’s costs to the countries, and other similar issues (see also here, here, here, here,here, here, here, here, here and here).
This article (Von der Leyen’s Speech: Continuing Climate Scare and Preparing for a New Pandemic) was created and published by Epp Tuul and is republished here under “Fair Use”
See Related Article Below
Decoding the EU’s State of the Union Address
“Europe is in a fight” — “A New Europe: Clean and Digital”
THE NEMETH REPORT
Since 2021, when it was first introduced, the President of the European Commission has delivered an annual State of the Union address in September, taking stock of the EU’s status and unveiling initiatives for the year ahead. This year’s speech, delivered by Ursula von der Leyen, opens with war-like rhetoric but centres on shaping a “new Europe” through expansive and accelerated government intervention. While subtly reinforcing the European Green Deal and net-zero goals, it brims with contradictions that has become typical of the thinking in Brussels, doubling down on discredited claims about energy prices and living costs we hear repeated ad nauseum in the UK.
The first third focuses on the war in Ukraine, the Gaza conflict, and the need to strengthen EU member states’ militaries through joint procurement. The subtext is that a defence buildup will aid faltering and stagnating European economies, struggling under the burden of red tape, regulations, and high energy prices.
The section on competitiveness is a study in paradox. Acknowledging businesses’ complaints of excessive bureaucracy and paperwork, von der Leyen promises that proposed changes will make things better and that “a digital Euro for example will make it easier for companies and consumers alike.” It’s unclear exactly how a programmable central bank digital currency, inserting itself between retail banks and their customers, will improve the situation. This reflects the address’s core dogma: Solutions lie in more government, more planning because “only what gets measured gets done.” Oh, ok. Sounds like President von der Leyen was talking with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney whose mantra is “What gets measured, gets managed.” Was this a hint towards the embedding of climate disclosures in EU business and the promotion of a global emissions price?
Competitiveness, von der Leyen argues, rests on a European AI built and powered by “clean” energy. Plus, the EU’s “clean tech sector” must be buttressed and promoted with the Clean Industrial Deal, which will “spark a virtuous cycle…we must urgently drive demand for European industrial leadership in clean tech.” The intent is to drive demand through public procurement which mirrors Carney’s recent “Buy Canadian” public procurement push—a curious transatlantic alignment.
Central to the Clean Industrial Deal and the commitment to clean tech and the circular economy is a doubling down on the European Green Deal. Here, von der Leyen repeats the mantra that net-zero will create jobs, strengthen industry, and make the EU energy independent because all the woes of the EU—the high energy prices, the unstable grid, the deindustrialization—all of that is because of Russia’s “dirty fossil fuels”. While promising to funnel more taxpayer money into wind, solar, and batteries with nuclear power as baseload, she perpetuates the myth that wind and solar lower prices. But, at least she concedes that “when energy costs rise…it is every single part of people’s lives that is affected.” She just seems to be in denial as to the root causes of those cost increases and prescribes yet more Commission intervention and oversight over member states.
Housing policy echoes Carney’s vision: an “Affordable Housing Plan” for houses that are “more affordable, more sustainable, and of better quality,” with an EU Housing Summit planned. Of course, the housing both von der Leyen and Carney are talking about is multi-family rental housing that will be “modular/prefabricated, low-carbon, climate resilient and net-zero construction.” The landlord will be either the government, as an equity investor, or large institutional investors.
For the automotive sector, von der Leyen jingoistically calls for European electric vehicles built with “European supply chains” because “the future of cars—and the cars of the future—must be made in Europe”! What type of EVs does the European Commission want for its citizens? That would be small electric cars to be developed, promoted, and financed through the “Small Affordable Cars Initiative.” Apparently, it’s in the EU’s best interest that the government “invest in small, affordable vehicles.” Does this mean the EU wants to create a European version of BYD? Take that, China and Russia!
Agriculture could not go without attention from the EU’s president. Farmers’ struggles are pinned mostly on “unfair competition” rather than high energy and input costs or the mountains of red tape and paperwork piled onto farmers or forcing farmers to take land of production or go organic all because of the EU green deal. To be fair, she did mention initiatives that have been taken to reduce the paperwork, but those are temporary and come with increased monitoring of farmer activities. The solution? More government subsidies with strings attached. Despite trade deals ostensibly inviting agricultural imports from Canada and the US, von der Leyen announced the EU will “boost our promotion budget to launch a new ‘Buy European Food’ campaign.” Trade and protectionism in one breath—the EU is filled with contradictions.
On US trade, President von der Leyen declares, “I do not believe in tariffs. Tariffs are taxes,” while endorsing the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)—a tariff by another name that taxes imports based on emissions. Hypocrisy in plain sight. But which media outlet in Europe will point that out?
The EU, in order to save democracy, which von der Leyen says “is under attack”, will also now get into the business of more directly funding smaller media outlets like “independent and local media.” With all 27 member states already operating state owned media outlets, this risks autocracy dressed up as pluralism. Why? Because every time the EU funds or supports something there are strings attached; why would media be any different? After all, who gets to decide which independent media organization or individual gets funding? The EU already spends over €80 million on media; entering into the realm of “independent” media represents an octopus-like extension that will likely push a pro-Brussels narrative potentially at the expense of genuine journalistic autonomy. In other words, this could very well be a new kind of propaganda machine under the guise of decentralized independence and distributed media. Tellingly, this section segues into calls for restricting social media to “protect children” AND to curb illegal migration.
On migration, von der Leyen is either engaging in incredible gas lighting or naivety. She states, “We in Europe must be the ones to decide who comes to us and in what circumstances, not the people-smugglers and traffickers. We must break their business model.” Bordering on farce, the solution proposed is to freeze the assets of smugglers and traffickers, restrict their mobility, and cut their profits. Really? This raises an important question: If the EU knows the smugglers’ identities in order to freeze assets and restrict mobility, why aren’t they arrested for human smuggling and trafficking, which are illegal!? How about actually policing your borders and fixing a judicial system that won’t permit the expelling of illegal entrants? Orwell would blush.
EU President von der Leyen’s address is a masterclass in Brussels doublespeak—preaching independence while centralizing power, decrying bureaucracy while piling on plans, and “saving” democracy with state-funded media. This “new Europe” seems more like a superstate where bureaucrats dictate your ride, roof, and reading list. Orwellian doesn’t even begin to describe these statements and policy framework. This EU State of the Union address is a fight against freedom, not a fight for freedom.
This article (Decoding the EU’s State of the Union Address) was created and published by The Nemeth Report and is republished here under “Fair Use”
Featured image: Getty Images
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply