UK’s Controversial Facial Recognition Tech Hits The Road

Your face might be starring in a government experiment you never asked for

CAM WAKEFIELD

You’ve probably gathered that Britain has developed a bit of a crush on surveillance. Not the kind you might associate with espionage thrillers or Cold War paranoia, but a distinctly modern version that looks suspiciously like a white van parked near your local grocery store, loaded with more cameras than a Hollywood red carpet.

This time, the government has taken things a step further, and if you’re in Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, or a few other lucky zip codes, you might be about to get your very own mobile facial recognition unit.

Yes, the Home Office has given the green light to a national fleet of surveillance vans, ten of them, decked out with live facial recognition (LFR) technology. Think of them as ice cream trucks for the surveillance state.

Except instead of handing out ice cream cones, they’re quietly checking whether your face matches someone on a police watchlist. Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Sussex, Thames Valley, and Hampshire will now have the pleasure of deploying these biometric buses, and if you’re feeling left out, don’t worry. They’re bound to expand further once the government remembers the rest of the map.

The official line is that this isn’t about catching low-level offenders or trying to ruin your day at the funfair; it’s about serious crimes like rape, murder, and assault. The big stuff. And if you’re not wanted for any of those, well, apparently you’ve got nothing to worry about. Just keep smiling and pretend the van isn’t there.

But let’s not get carried away. Despite what the ministers say, the facts have an awkward way of surfacing. This glorious techno-policing experiment has already been caught moonlighting at events like concerts and football matches, and even chasing down ticket touts. Ticket touts. Nothing screams national emergency like someone selling a pair of Taylor Swift seats for £500 on Craigslist.

Rebecca Vincent of Big Brother Watch said, “Police have interpreted the absence of any legislative basis authorizing the use of this intrusive technology as carte blanche to continue to roll it out unfettered.” Which is a wonderfully polite way of saying the cops are doing whatever they want because nobody’s told them not to.

Now, to be fair, the Home Office has insisted they’re being “measured” and “proportionate.” According to Dame Diana Johnson, the Minister for Saying Everything Is Fine, signs will be posted to let you know when your face is being vacuumed into a database, and anything captured will be deleted after the operation ends. Which is a bit like saying, “We only peek into your windows during dinner, and we promise not to keep the footage.” Comforting.

In a statement that would make Orwell blink, Ryan Wain from the Tony Blair Institute, yes, that Tony Blair, defended the use of LFR with the reassuring line: “Not on the list? Your face will be pixelated, and no data will be stored, end of.” That’s it. Just trust us. Because if there’s one thing history has taught us, it’s that large, unaccountable systems never, ever make mistakes.

Tell that to Shaun Thompson.


This article (UK’s Controversial Facial Recognition Tech Hits The Road) was created and published by Reclaim the Net and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Cam Wakefield

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*