Amid promises of safer streets, Britain edges closer to a future where every passing face becomes a data point.
KEN MACON
Calls for wider deployment of live facial recognition technology have intensified following Saturday’s knife attack on a train in Cambridgeshire, England, an incident that left 11 passengers injured and a railway worker fighting for his life.
Both the UK government and Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp have voiced support for expanding surveillance capabilities, arguing that the technology can help police identify offenders more effectively.
A Home Office spokesperson told The Telegraph that “facial recognition tools are vital in helping police tackle crime, protect the public and bring offenders to justice” and added: “The minister for Policing and Crime has been clear that she wants the police to use facial recognition more widely. That’s why we will soon be launching a public consultation to support a responsible increase in its use.”
Philp, writing separately in The Telegraph, urged a nationwide rollout of live facial recognition in public spaces such as town centers and train stations, alongside a dramatic increase in stop and search operations to “take far more knives off the street.”
The stabbing occurred on a high-speed train bound for London after it departed Peterborough at around 7:30 p.m.
Witnesses described a chaotic scene as passengers tried to escape or hide, with some using their clothes to stop the bleeding of those injured.
According to police, the attacker, a 32-year-old British national, was armed with a large kitchen knife and was eventually subdued by armed officers after shouting “kill me, kill me.”
Police have ruled out terrorism but continue to investigate the motive. An LNER employee who attempted to intervene remains in critical condition, while other passengers were praised for acts of courage that likely prevented further casualties.
The push for increased use of facial recognition comes as privacy advocates continue to raise concerns about unchecked surveillance and its potential misuse.
Although the Home Office insists the upcoming consultation will promote “responsible” use, campaigners have long warned that live facial recognition risks normalizing mass monitoring of the public and eroding civil liberties without sufficient oversight or transparency.
***
The Metropolitan Police has revealed that it scanned more than three million faces across London using live facial recognition between September 2024 and September 2025, a figure that shows the growing scale of mass biometric surveillance in the UK.
The force’s own data shows that these millions of scans produced only 962 arrests, meaning that roughly 99.97% of the people captured by the cameras were not suspected of any crime. Statistically, this equates to over 3,000 innocent individuals being scanned for every single arrest.
Of those arrests, 113 led to no further action, suggesting that many of the identifications failed to result in charges or prosecutions.
The report also revealed that 16 arrests were related to “Telecommunications” offenses, but it provided no explanation of what those crimes entailed.
The absence of detail has prompted speculation that some identifications may have been linked to online activity, though the Met has not confirmed any connection.
The data also recorded 10 false alerts, cases where the system incorrectly matched a person’s face to someone on a watchlist.
Jasleen Chaggar, Legal & Policy Officer at Big Brother Watch, said it was “alarming that over 3 million people have been scanned with police facial recognition cameras in the past year in London alone.”
Chaggar condemned the technology as “an Orwellian and authoritarian technology that treats millions of innocent people like suspects and risks serious injustice,” and urged the government to immediately halt its use.
This article (UK Knife Attack Fuels Renewed Push for Facial Recognition) was created and published by Reclaim the Net and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Ken Macon
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply