The Who, the Flu Jab and Their Probable Power Over Us All

On 22 January Tortapani posted this item showing the contents of the flu jab: JFK Jr. WARNING: “In a million years, I would not take the flu shot—& I’ll tell you why.” “The flu shot sets you up for flu, 36% pathogenic priming for COVID & boosts non-flu illnesses like pneumonia 440%.”

Check out this evidence—ingredients, research & figures that deserve informed consent; 

Harmful Components in Flu Vaccines (injected straight into your blood):

• Formaldehyde – a recognized carcinogen;

• Thimerosal (ethylmercury) – neurotoxic additive in multi-dose vials common in big corporate clinics & hospitals;

• Polysorbate 80 – penetrates the blood-brain barrier, associated with infertility;

• Neomycin – antibiotic known to cause serious allergies;

• Egg proteins & dog kidney cells – potential allergens plus foreign DNA bits. *Choosing ‘Egg Free’ version contains Armyworm Ovary DNA;

• Squalene MF59 (in adjuvanted versions) – connected to autoimmune issues from Gulf War Syndrome;

Crucial Research Revealing the Risks:

• Cochrane Review & Cowling et al. (2012): Flu vaccine raised non-flu respiratory issues 4.4X, including COVID & pneumonia—a 440% spike!

• Pentagon Study (2017–2018): Troops who got the flu shot faced 36% greater chance of coronavirus;

• Skowronski et al. (2009): Verified vaccine-associated enhanced illness;

• Various meta-analyses (2022): Indicate interference and elevated danger for specific strains.

Alarming Data:

• VAERS (up to 2025): 235,818 reports of adverse reactions, 1,024 hospitalizations, with huge underreporting;

• Guillain-Barré Syndrome: 1 per million doses (per WHO);

• Kids who are vaccinated: 4.4X higher odds of other respiratory viruses;

• Service members: 36% heightened coronavirus risk post-flu shot.

Your body’s natural defences outsmart Big Pharma’s assumptions. Strengthen them via nutrition, natural prevention, natural treatment…skip the injections. 

Graham Bedford asked the question “why is it not banned”? Why indeed! Does this now come under the banner of the provisions that the WHO IHR treaty may well have inserted it into their “pandemic preparedness” heading? I have not taken the flu jab for a number of years now. The only time I ever took one I caught flu! Several years ago, I subscribed to the “Better Life” conference held in Bath.  I had digital access and listened to most of the contributors.  There was quite a concentrated emphasis upon the future role of the WHO in our lives regarding the way healthcare was presented.  The WHO wishes to respond to “Pandemics” by making vaccines mandatory. It was opined that they are a coercive body that intends to impose “health regulations” mandatorily across all nations that sign up to their programme.  The COVID “pandemic” apparently laid the foundations for what was to come in the future.

Dietrich Klinghardt (A German presenter at the conference) stated that all the labs in Germany and the USA are run by the “interests” that brought us COVID “vaccines”.  His message to the conference was that the World need a different kind of medicine that does not carry such commercially damaging influences ie financial and power! Who could disagree with that?  It has been suggested that the WHO will become a coercive body if they are given control over all our health.  The COVID pandemic laid the foundations for the “trap” that is being fashioned to enable total control over future “pandemic” preparedness events.

In October 2023, I took part in the online consultation process regarding the proposal that all countries should sign over to the WHO the responsibility to oversee and mandatorily medicate all the people without question or choice. I wrote my response to the consultation as follows:-

Recent events have not illustrated any especial commitment to consideration of the wishes of the people of Britain.  I am not at all convinced that the sovereignty of Parliament – and by definition “The People” would remain unchanged. If the UK government wishes to accept an IHR amendment if must be on the absolute understanding that such amendments would be published for national scrutiny and full and proper debate followed by “unwhipped” voting in the HOC would take place. Parliament receives its ability to act via the wishes of The People.  Therefore, any matter of such major importance such as this far reaching WHO IHR must be laid before the people and their approval granted.” 

The WHO could impose new “pandemic measures” if they deem there is a threat.  The WHO will have absolute power to mandate medication without telling us what is in them. Neither will they have to provide proof of efficacy and safety!  In May 2024 only a “simple majority” will be needed to vote this into place. 

NOTES:  Our government needs to send a “note of rejection” to refuse this IHR 

The main elements of the WHO Powers:-

1. Self authorisation will cease. The WHO will be omnipotent.  No Nation will have any “self-regulation”. All power will reside in the WHO.  No semblance of democracy will remain.
2. WHO recommendations will be legally binding (Article 13a & Article 42)
3. Information control, censorship and manipulation will mean the end of Justice
4. Article 12 relates to the conditions for a “public Health Emergency”

This would mean the end of democracy. This will usher in Totalitarianism rule and there will be no freedom of speech.

5)There are no checks and balances.  There is no system to challenge any WHO directive.

6) No accountability.  The WHO will have full immunity and full tax exemption

7) Fundamental rights and human dignity. Article 3 paragraph 1 needs to be adjusted otherwise there will be no chance to protect any of the above rights.

I sent a copy of my response to my MP.  The response came back as written by the then Minister of State Will Quince:-

“The best way to ensure protection for the UK from the next pandemic is by ensuring that all countries can contain and respond to outbreaks through compliance with a strengthened IHR.

My view:-  They believe that the next pandemic is “when” not “if”. “Compliance with a strengthened IHR implies that they fully intend to implement the potential WHO takeover. Government is supporting the process of agreeing targeted amendments to the WHO IHR including increased compliance and implemention of the IHR, (increasing transparency and timely speed up of reporting). Government supports the process.  Not a hint of concern for the potential handover of Britain to the WHO IHR governance”

“At the 75th WHO Assembly in May 2022, The Member States, including Britain Agreed by consensus to adopt one process related, amendment under Article 59 of the IHR that reduces the time for future amendments to come into force. Member States have the ability to submit proposal amendments for consideration. Plus the formation of a “working group” of all member states so all amendments would be negotiated and agreed.

My view:- Consensus does not confirm a “unanimous” approval of the “reduced time allowance” under Article 59 or all future amendments to come into force.  Future amendments may mean that more stringent and far reaching “rule” may be brought into use much more quickly. “Proposed amendments” by Member States could very well be rejected by the Working Group without there being time enough for Sovereign People to be notified via their Parliaments and given a say! 

In fact any opportunity for the “People” to be consulted in any way before the governance of themselves and their “health and well being” is signed away by the “consensus” of a working group of foreign interests.

“Member States agreed to submit the “targeted” amendments (which have been notified and agreed) to the 77th WHA in May 2024. For the amendments to be adopted, at least 2/3rds of the Member States will need to agree to them. (Amendments and Relevant papers including reports from the “working group” are available on the WHO website at www.who.int.  The negotiating of amendments began in Nov 2022.  The UK is an active party to that process and we will continue to work with our international partners to achieve a good outcome for the UK.

My View:-  So what is the government’s stance on these amendments?  Why have the British People not been a) properly informed of this proposal to sign up to any agreement with the WHO. b) asked if they agree to have any agreement that will most assuredly result in a loss of Sovereignty. Thr “Loose” definition of Pandemic Preparedness could very easily be made to include any event of concern. 

“The UK Government has a strong commitment and duty to implement international law that it is subject to. However, we have been clear that the UK will not sign up to any IHR amendments that would compromise its ability to take domestic decisions on national public health measures.

There are currently no plans to hold a vote on IHR amendments. Should the UK Government wish to accept an IHR amendment, changes to domestic law may be required, depending on its content. The Government would place such legislation before Parliament in the usual way. 

In all circumstances, the sovereignty of Parliament would remain unchanged, and the UK would remain in control of any future domestic decisions about national public health measures.”  (Letter ends)

The big questions are…. Has the damaging WHO IHR now been adopted and do we believe the “assurance” that the sovereignty of Parliament would remain unchanged and we would still retain control over future health issue measures?

---

This article (The WHO, the flu jab and their probable power over us all) was created and published by Free Speech Backlash and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Frederica