The Knights Templar CONSPIRACY [Part 1]
Three conflicting versions of history, some pretty serious criminal charges, an angry king and a greedy pope walk into a bar…
AGENT131711
By this point in time, the papacy had stolen a large portion of the world through forgery, swindles and scandals (discussed in Sex, Murder & a Scheme: How the Pope Stole the World). The Pope was now officially the most powerful man, so powerful he controlled kingdoms and the militaries within, but controlling other nation’s militaries wasn’t enough, the Pope wanted his own fighting force. Enter: The Knights Templar – which was great for the pope… until something went wrong… very wrong…
Under control of the Pope, supported by King Richard I of England, Richard III (England) King Louis VII (France) and Louis IX (France), the Knights Templar grew in size and established new chapters throughout Western Europe. The Knights were given tax-exempt status and full immunity in a great many countries. Their one and only boss was the Pope; the Knights answered to no other authority.
A cleverly designed propaganda campaign painted the Knights as young men who had taken vows to chastity and poverty; Christian warriors who were protecting the Holy Land. Because of this, donations poured into their organization from all over Europe “and every stratum of society”. The donations were so enormous that if there ever was a vow of poverty, that concept was scrapped. In a short matter of time, the Knights became filthy rich and owned castles, churches, farms and wineries all over Western Europe and parts of the Middle East. They got into trade and began selling commodities such as crops, wool, and wine throughout Europe and also became landlords, renting out huge swaths of land. At the height of their influence, the Templars owned a massive fleet of ships. Conservative estimates place the Templar‘s assets at over 10,000 estates and hundreds of thousands of acres of land across Europe and the Levant. Hell, they even owned the Mediterranean island of Cyprus.
.
Meanwhile, the Pope’s Knights of Malta were on the island of Malta:
.
The Pope also operated the Knights Hospitaller, which, by this point in time, were stationed in Margat:
.
According to an 18th century writer, the money went to their heads and the Templars became as arrogant as pomp princes.
In addition to the land, ships and commercial trade businesses, the wealthy Knights created an international banking institution – the first of its kind – which offered early forms of banking, loans, letters of credit and safety deposit boxes. Through these banks, funding was provided for wars and Crusades. Their banks grew into a vast economic infrastructure across Europe and in the Holy Land. It was only a matter of time before these entities were serving as the primary banks of European monarchs and nobles. In London, the Knights built their headquarters, known as the New Temple. This location was a repository for the order’s accumulated revenues and became a royal treasury. The Roman Catholic Church itself was a consumer of the Templars bank. These banks allowed the Church to store her immense assets and transfer them from country to country. It is said the Templars had an annual revenue approaching $2 billion in today‘s currency value.
And this is when the first conspiracy of this series begins – well technically the second, because the Pope stealing the world would have been the first and that, my friends, was a pretty damn big conspiracy…
First let me tell you what history tells us then we will look at what history doesn’t tell us.
THE FIRST VERSION OF HISTORY
You have to remember what was happening at this time; the papacy had stolen the world with the Donation of Constantine forgery and was using its fraudulently obtained power to control monarchies.
Although a great deal of emperors and kings went along with the scheme (because they knew being excommunicated by the Pope was essentially a political death sentence), there were a few rulers that were like Bro, I’m King, these are my lands, I don’t have to listen to everything you tell me. King Philip IV of France was one of these dudes. According to history, this led to a bitter conflict over royal authority. It was the Vicar of God versus Philip IV of France who was one of the most powerful monarchs in Europe at the start of the 14th century.
Modern day books claim, around the year 1290, the King needed money to finance his war against England, so he taxed the Pope’s clergy without first seeking the Pope’s permission. Six years later, in 1296, the Pope responded by issuing a papal bull which prohibited the taxing of clergy without papal authorization. They tell us this bull was seen as a threat to Philip’s political authority and it led to a standoff between the two leaders. For whatever reason, the papacy backed down (momentarily) and reluctantly decided kings can tax clergy after all.
It seems everything was peachy until disaster struck. The King was facing significant financial challenges and was said to have been often in debt. So, only a few years after the papal bull, in 1299, he borrowed money from the Knights Templar. The loan from the Knights totaled 500,000 livres – which sounds like a lot of money but it is actually equal to less than $670,000 today, so I’m not sure if it was really that much money for a King, but history says it was. And here’s where history starts to get weird:
They tell us, less than two years after the loan, in 1301, Philip arrested one of the Pope’s bishops on charges of high treason. The bishop of Pamiers (France), Bernard Saisset, was accused of attempting an insurrection on behalf of the House of Foix which was determined to take over the French coastal Navarre (a very important area for trade routes). When Philip came to learn of the bishop working for the House of Foix, he had him imprisoned. This really pissed off Pope Boniface who responded by suspending Philip’s right to tax clergy and further demanded all French clergy come to Rome “to discuss the king’s governance”.
The King then forbade any gold or silver from leaving France, instantly cutting off a large part of the wealth the Pope received from France. Interestingly, the English King Edward I acted quickly to take similar measures. The King then told his people that the Pope was trying to claim that he owned France and all of the wealth within it, which made citizens furious.
The Templars then fled to their island of Cyprus.
The following year, in 1303, Philip launched an attack on Boniface himself, raiding his residence and arresting the Pope. He proceeded to hold him hostage for several days. Boniface was released shortly after but died a month later. The next Pope, Benedict XI, did not last long. It is suspected he was poisoned by King Philip’s councillor, Guillaume de Nogaret. Shit had officially hit the fan.
1306: According to history, the King was said to be financially bleeding at this point. To address these financial issues, he resorted to various measures including the arrest of Jews in France, seizing their assets (including all of their gold) and banishing them from the country.
Not long after the arrest and imprisonment of the Pope, the King ordered the arrest of the Templars. On Friday, October 13th, they were arrested en mass, accused of serious offenses, including heresy, blasphemy, idolatry, homosexual practices, trampling and urinating on the Crucifix, secret rites of obscene kisses, sodomy, usury, financial corruption and high treason. It is said they confessed to all of the aforementioned but it is also claimed they only confessed due to torture. A few years later, dozens of Templars were burned at the stake in Paris for their confessions. History says these charges were all false and that the King made the whole thing up to get out of paying back the money he owed the Templars. History further states he sought to gain control of the wealth of the Knights Templar. And one more thing history now strangely tells us; there seemed to be no longer a need for the Knights, so “under pressure from King Philip, Pope Clement V reluctantly dissolved the Knights Templar in 1312”. – What? Does any of this make sense to anyone?
THE SECOND VERSION OF HISTORY
After becoming exceptionally wealthy elites, the Knights developed habits, specifically drinking and practicing a “dark” religion. In fact, there was an old saying, “to drink like a Templar” and the old German word Templehaus meant “house of ill-fame”. The King, through ongoing business dealings with the Templars, had established a friendship with them. As the years passed, he watched the moral decay of the Knights and reached the point of becoming quite alarmed by their behavior. He urged the Pope to take action but the Pope refused. The following year, when the Pope still had not taken action, the King then had them arrested because what they were doing was crimes in France.
It may be true that the Knights confessed to crimes under torture, but what history leaves out is this interrogation method was only the first. The Pope himself would then interview the Knights, on his own terms, in his own territory (he chose Paris), without torture. The Pope demanded they speak the truth and at this time most of the Templars admitted to the same. They even signed sworn testimonials which included admitting to spitting on the cross.
History says, despite having this knowledge, the Pope still did not want to take action against the group – whether this was because he didn’t truly believe it or because it would have been a massive scandal or because the Knights had now become more powerful than the papacy, we will never know. What happened next was the Pope summoned over 70 additional French Knights to be interviewed. This interview also did not include torture and occurred in the presence of the Pope himself. At this time these Templars confessed to the same and signed sworn statements. Their sworn testimony also included spitting on the cross and other acts which were too disturbing for authors of the 1920s to put on paper.
Even with the multiple batches of identical confessions, the Pope still refused to take action. More Templars were interviewed and the outcome was the same. Now, men of the Order from different countries had matching statements admitting to Anti-Christian behavior and initiation rituals which ranged from obscene to evil. However, this still didn’t sway the Pope. The Pope even went as far as defending the Knights to the King then the Pope worked to suppress the information.
Regarding the claim that the King had the Knights murdered to get out of repaying a debt – something history forgets to mention is, completely unrelated to the Templars, the citizens of France were upset with the King. They were angry because they felt he had debased their coin currency. You see, the King had ordered it be mixed with alloy for financial reasons after a war with England. This was done publicly and the coinage was restored not long after. It is said, at the time these slanderous accusations were made, they were made out of anger.
Regarding seizing the Jews property, this was not done because the King was financially broke, it was done because of the Jews actions (usury, uprisings / aiding revolutions / aiding the enemy / attempting to cause upheaval). The King was not the first nor the last to take these actions followed by banishing Jews from his country. I will show you this in detail in my next series, The Never Before Told Story of WWI:
The King saw both the Templars and the Jews as a threat to his kingdom. When he flushed them out of his country, it “resulted in immense benefits to France”. Historian M. Funck-Brentano described the whole country as prospering during the early fourteenth century with an “increase of population, flourishing agriculture and industry”. This led to swine-hearders owning vineyards and cow hearders owning townhouses in Languedoc and Provence.
The first version of history also fails to report that it was not the King who ordered the Templars to burn at the stake. This decision was made by the Parliament of Tours “with hardly a dissenting vote”. The University of Paris stated the confessions, taken years prior in Paris, were authentic and not obtained under torture. It is said not one citizen in Paris contested the execution of the Knights nor did one come to their defense, which leads one to ask; if the Knights were heroes, as history has described them, why were there no protests?
THE THIRD VERSION OF HISTORY
The Templars essentially controlled the elites of society because they held their money – and if there’s one entity you don’t want a massive falling out with, it’s your bank. Because of this, the Templars themselves became elites and began partaking in practices which the rich and famous were involved in; black magic, Alchemy and Kabballah. Many claim they had flat out become Satanists and Luciferians. Black Magic and Satanism were indeed practiced by the wealthy, especially in France. Do you remember Gilles de Rais from my piece The Pharmacopeia of Pharmakeia: The Dark Art of “Medicine”? If you didn’t read it, de Rais was French nobility and was both an Alchemist and a Satanist. As a Satanist he was interested in summoning demons and had an obsession with children. According to his trial transcript, he lured children to his royal castle, molested them and executed them. The blood of the murdered would be used in rituals. After the ceremony, the bodies would be dismembered and burned. de Rais is believed to be the first known serial killer in history with some historians attributing as many as 600 deaths to him. Want to know who his pal was? JOAN OF ARC. Remember how she died? Burned at the stake for practicing witchcraft.
According to this theory, not only were the Knights cursing Jesus Christ while worshipping the devil, they were also partaking in usury and monies which they were in charge of would sometimes go missing. Perhaps this is why the King forbade gold and silver from leaving the country? Perhaps this is the real reason the Pope was raided and imprisoned? Or has history been so suppressed that there is another entirely untold story out there?…
NEXT READ: KNIGHTS TEMPLAR: DOUBLE AGENTS?: Lost Technology, Muslims & The Ark of the Covenant
But first, if you like my work, please keep me hydrated! Or become a paid sub and get two awesome paid sub exclusive articles per month.
See Part 2 Below
Knights Templar: Double Agents? Lost Technology, Muslims & The Ark of the Covenant [PART 2]
History tells us the group’s massive amounts of property and wealth were given by the Pope to a rival order also belonging to the Pope, the Knights Hospitallers. However, it’s thought by some that King Philip IV and King Edward II of England seized most of the Knights Templar’s wealth. Pre-1920’s historians insist the King did not touch the Templar’s money. There is no way of knowing the truth, but if I had to guess, the Pope retained most of the wealth because at this time the Pope was still the most powerful man in the world.
Trying to track down what happened to any of the assets seems impossible. Imagine the equivalent of no less than two billion dollars worth of assets vanishing overnight. Where did all the banks go? The vast amount of castles and property across the world? The wineries? The fleet of ships? If you try to research “Hospitallers banks”, you receive no results. If you ask ChatGPT it claims it went out of business. Did the Muslims gain access to much of the Templars wealth? Did the Templar’s gift them access? Did they form a partnership? Did the Knights convert to Islam? Is this why it is so suppressed? If the Knights were indeed in cahoots with the Muslims, it would explain why the Pope dissolved the order.
SUPER CONSPIRACY THEORY
Now if you want to get super “conspiracy theory” on this topic, according to the current-day Knights of Templar Grandmaster, Timothy Hogan, the Knights knew there was lost technology (in other words, they were trying to figure out where the technology went pre ”Great Reset”). The Knights were sent to the Egyptian pyramids to search for it – pyramids which, to this day, are unexplainable and feature a deep, complex, underground tunnel system which is further unexplainable. Combine this with all of the other unexplainable buildings across the world – buildings which we are told were created pre-electricity, pre-power tools, pre-machinery – there sure does appear to be lost technology. Mr. Hogan said, the Templars (at the direction of the Pope) were on a quest to locate the technology and bring it back to Europe to get Europe out of the Dark Ages.
THE ARK OF THE COVENANT
In Judaism, the Ark is said to have been a wooden chest containing the two stone tablets of the Ten Commandments. It is suspected to have looked something like this:
According to the Hebrew Bible, the Ark was constructed by the Israelites while they were camping out in the Sinai Desert, after they fled Egypt. The ark has a number of seemingly magical powers, according to the Hebrew Bible. In the Old Testament, The Ark of the Covenant was used by the Israelites in battle. It is said that when the Ark was carried into battle, the Israelites were victorious. There are also accounts of the Ark being captured by the Philistines and used against the Israelites. But what exactly was the Ark of the Covenant?
The idea that the Ark of the Covenant was an electrical device, specifically a capacitor, has been discussed by scholars and is believed by the current day Knights Templar Freemasons (which, by the way, claim to have no “provable” relation to the original Knights Templar). The theory suggests that the Ark’s construction, with its inner and outer layers of gold and wood, could function similarly to a Leyden jar, an early form of capacitor.
.
According to this theory, the Ark could store static electricity generated by the movement of the priests carrying it through the desert. Once charged, it would become a weapon of mass destruction.
According to the current-day Knight’s own records, they brought six different Arks back to Europe then they later brought them to the United States to hide them. The Templar’s claim they are currently in possession of all six and are aware of at least four more but have not been able to gain possession of those – more on this in a moment. The Templars also claim it is their goal to share this lost technology with the world very soon.
WHAT THE KNIGHTS TEMPLAR FOUND IN ANCIENT EGYPT
According to the Templars, under the direction of the Pope, in search of lost technology, the Knights began excavating ground in Egypt. (One would think, in order to have the ability to dig up land, the Templar’s surely must have had permission from the massive Muslim forces who fully controlled the area, right?)
Here they located a great many things including “lost arts and sciences”, a series of boxes, tombs with bones which they collected, “strange, mysterious substances” which they were able to reproduce Alchemically and other assorted artifacts. Many carvings were discovered deep underground. They believe this engraving in stone shows electricity generating devices:
The Templars claim the pyramids themselves were designed to be electricity generators and when an Ark was inserted into a pyramid “a tremendous amount of electricity would be generated”. They further state the electricity was “being harnessed at the different temples in the region”, then go on to explain there are stones lining the temples that have metal inserted into them, making them receivers and allowing citizens to plug devices into them. They additionally believe, due to the location and layout of the pyramids, they would be capable of broadcasting electricity to the entire world, therefore, when the boxes (Arks) were removed, it killed the world’s electricity. – As wild as this may sound, it might not be. In an article coming in the near future, we will be discussing the pyramids that were located right here in the USA when explorers arrived.
Obviously, there are no pyramids now and nobody is aware there were pyramids in the US because that information has been scrubbed – one must ask why? Because it doesn’t fit with the narrative. And being that there were indeed pyramids in the United States, did these receive electricity from Egypt? Or perhaps they produced their own power for the US? I know it may sound silly, but when we combined that with what we will discuss in my article about Tesla and his inventions, it really isn’t that farfetched, it only sounds ridiculous because we have been taught to believe the concept of ancient electricity and ancient high-tech civilizations are in themselves what is ridiculous.
Now let’s get back to how the Templars met their demise:
According to the Knights, the Templars had the entire United States mapped hundreds of years before Christopher Columbus because they had been coming here to stash their own goods since the 1200s – goods which they didn’t want stored in their own banks. As proof of this, the Knights claim they were who buried the Kensington Runestone in Minnesota (which would be unearthed in the late 1800s).
If the Knights were indeed coming to America to stash treasures, was this behind the Pope’s back? Were these assets they were skimming off the top? Remember, the Pope was supposed to be the one and only person in the world who controlled the Templars and it was through the Pope that the organization had been granted immunity to all laws as well as immunity to taxation, but the assets of the Templar’s were supposed to be assets of the Roman Catholic Church, more specifically, the Pope himself.
Although the Templars were sent on a mission to find lost technology, and they succeeded, this then presented a problem, a major problem. That problem was, what they discovered went against what the Church was teaching. According to the Templar’s, the Pope absolutely could not have the Templar’s findings broadcast to the public, as high technology lost civilizations do not fit with the Bible and would lead to too many questions, therefore, it was imperative that this information and these findings be suppressed. This caused a great fracture in the relationship between the Pope and his own Military Order.
Since the Knights already had the US mapped, they made a goal of using the continent to “create a New Jerusalem” – a Jerusalem which would be out from under the stranglehold of the Pope who, as you know, now controlled most of Europe, parts of Africa, islands, etc.
The Knights began secretly working against the Pope. Again, let’s skip ahead in time to a Freemasonic book from the 1800’s…
…we learn the ritual to become a 33rd Degree Active Mason includes the candidate being crowned with laurel leaves representing the “civic crown of the Roman Republic”. The oath-taker also praises Frederick the Great (Frederick of Prussia, a Freemason himself who, when the Church tried to dissolve the Jesuits, would become their biggest ally). While praising Frederick the Great, simultaneously, the oath-taker vows to destroy the Pope and punish corruption while rebuilding the Temple of Solomon. Freemasonic rituals also include trampling on items representing kings and the Pope himself. You can learn more about this in my piece Exposed: The 33rd Degree KCCH. Now let’s go back in time to the original Knights Templar:
With all of this in mind, were the Knights Templar indeed in bed with the Muslims in effort to destroy the papacy? Did they intentionally lose, gift or sell the Crusader States? Did they make a pact with the Muslims which exchanged the Crusader States for something? And did they do so because all along their plan was to relocate to their “new Jerusalem” in the USA? Was this a massive disaster for the Pope because the Knights had full immunity, answered to no one other than the Pope, had full control over the Pope’s banking system and assets within while operating exempt from taxes? Did King Philip really want them executed to avoid repaying a loan? Or was something much deeper going on? Were the Knights really engaged in the behavior they were accused of (heresy, blasphemy, idolatry, homosexual practices, trampling and urinating on the Crucifix, secret rites of obscene kisses, sodomy, usury, financial corruption and high treason)? If we skip ahead to the modern day Freemasons, we see the identical behaviors and accusations (read my pieces Freemasonry and the Luciferian Doctrine, The Royal Order of Jesters: Pedophilia, Priests, Police, Presidents and More, The Secret Order of SOBIB and The Shriners: Sex Accusations, Financial Corruption). Is this all just coincidence?
Another theory exists and in this theory the Templars had become a threat. The organization outgrew the papacy and had the ability, skill, knowledge and power needed to take it down. Politically speaking, the Pope could not, seemingly out of the blue, order the arrest of his own Military Order without publicly admitting he lost control of his own entity – a political death sentence. Therefore he needed an excuse, and that excuse came in the form of the King (a king which the Pope never would have taken orders from because the papacy made it clear that the Vicar of Christ answered to no one).
Whatever the true reason, on Friday the 13th of October 1307, scores of Templars were arrested. Out of the 20,000 total Templars, it is estimated that only 600 were rounded up to stand trial. Eventually, many were found guilty and sentenced to death for their crimes. Then, in March of the year 1314, many were burned at the stake. History claims that upon being burned, Jacques de Molay (Grand Master of the Knights Templar) cursed both the King and Pope, stating both will be dead within a year. Sure enough, they both died within a year. Illness and a stroke were blamed. Over the next 14 years, the Kings three sons and his grandson all died in “somewhat mysterious circumstances”.
It was after this that the Pope dissolved the order and that was allegedly the end of the Knights… or was it? After the supposed fall of the Templars, the Pope began losing control and ultimately fled Rome to reside in France. 33 years from the death of Jacques de Molay, otherwise healthy villages of Europeans would suddenly begin falling terribly ill – so sick that large swaths of populations died, leaving villages uninhabited. The Jews (who were practicing Kabballah) were blamed, it was said they poisoned the wells. In fact, they admitted to it, but like the Templars, they claim to have admitted to it under torture. Was it the Jews? Or was it the Pope? Or was it the Templars seeking revenge after having fled to America?….
SOURCES, NOTES & OTHER STUFF
https://archive.org/details/secretsocietiess0000webs/page/72/mode/2up?view=theater
https://archive.org/details/secretsocietiess0000webs/page/64/mode/2up?view=theater
Templar Order (Assassin’s Creed) video game: A secret transnational organization that has striven to seize control of humanity in the name of uplifting their condition and inaugurating lasting, world peace, with a vision of a perfect, global society under their dominion
https://archive.org/details/secretsocietiess0000webs/page/66/mode/2up?view=theater
This wasn’t the first time the Templars had been put to death.
https://archive.org/details/secretsocietiess0000webs/page/50/mode/2up?view=theater
https://archive.org/details/secretsocietiess0000webs/page/52/mode/2up?view=theater
https://archive.org/details/secretsocietiess0000webs/page/58/mode/2up?view=theater
Third Theory: Their New Religion https://archive.org/details/secretsocietiess0000webs/page/62/mode/2up?view=theater
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_Military_Order_of_Malta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knights_Hospitaller
corruption: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1832571?seq=2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trials_of_the_Knights_Templar https://www.history.com/topics/middle-ages/the-knights-templar
https://bigthink.com/the-past/knights-templar-crusades-finance/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Knights_Templar
https://bigthink.com/culture-religion/did-the-knights-templar-invent-modern-banking/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trials_of_the_Knights_Templar https://www.history.com/topics/middle-ages/the-knights-templar
I’m a researcher. Come explore uncomfortable Truths in a lighthearted way that makes them easier to digest (and sometimes even hilarious). I publish special deep dives for paid subs twice a month. Everything else is free.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply