The Invasion of Britain: Making Britain Foreign

The invasion of Britain

Making Britain foreign.

LAURA PERRINS

I preferred it the old way, when ‘British policy was to make the world England.’ This is one of my favourite quotes from my favourite films, the Last of the Mohicans by a British soldier in colonial America. He questions why his superiors are bargaining with some colonists for their loyalty and service in fighting the French.


(At 3:50.)

Safe to say, that policy has died a death.

Yes, even as an Irish person I preferred it when the policy was ‘make the world England.’ Sure, I would not have liked it if I was living in Ireland 150 years ago but I’m not that person now am I. So spare me the lectures.

Now British governmental policy – Labour or Conservative – seems to be, make Britain Afghani. Or Pakistani or anything, absolutely anything but English. On Thursday The United Nations projected that the UK will have the largest population increase of any major European country by the end of the century.

In its report, World Population Prospects, it predicts that the UK population will rise 6.8% from 69.6 million to 74.3 million by 2100. That is not due to a predicted turn around in the native fertility rate. It is due to immigration. “Without immigration, the UK population would be under 50 million, similar to the levels of the 1950s.”

This week confirmed that my decision to move the family from London to Ireland two years ago was the right one. I miss London a lot and Ireland has it’s own problems that I wrote about here and here but nothing can top Basket case Britain right now.

The story this week of the Afghani relocation scheme and cover – up just proves everything we already knew: it’s over. You can feel it, the once great Great Britain, is done. Why does every problem in Britain result in the importation of non – British people? Every single one, and often those imported are men of military age from cultures vastly different to British culture, customs and traditions.

Nothing in the Afghani relocation scheme makes sense. How is that this e-mail sent to verify names of Afghans who aided the British Army was sent in error resulting in 25,000 Afghans being relocated to Britain at a cost of £7 billion. Clarification is needed.

How is a soldier to verify claims of assistance in a clan culture? Sure, the interpreters might be easy enough to identify but as Johnny Mercer, former minister for veterans’ affairs, points out in the Telegraph “there were only ever about 1,000-1,200 badged members of CF 333 and CF444 (Afghan special forces personnel) I couldn’t understand where all these Afghans were coming from.”

In fact, “the net result of this spectacular cluster is that we’ve let into this country thousands with little or tenuous links to the UK, and still some Afghan special forces we set up the bloody schemes for remain trapped in Afghanistan, Pakistan or worse, Iran.”

The Afghans put at risk had to be relocated to the UK, we are told. But so did their families. Well, a family in the clan culture of Afghanistan could be the 9 kids, 23 cousins and 44 aunts and uncles. On and on it goes. Lies and misleading information piled on top of superinjunctions.

Over 30,000 Afghans have been resettled in the UK already. Morgoth after seeing RAF planes flying for weeks overhead in his piece notes “A few days after viewing the RAF’s hardware, I met with an old friend for a few pints and, as is the norm these days, we began moaning about the state of the country. He started by telling me that Ministry of Defence housing in his area, usually allotted for military personnel and their families, was being crammed full of foreigners. None of the local natives had been informed where these people were coming from, why they were there, or how long they would be staying. However, it was noticed that the foreign faces seemed to change every few months, as if one family or lone male was moved in and then shifted off to somewhere else, when more people would be brought in to fill the housing slot.”

It is obvious that it is now British policy to make England (and Scotland and Wales) foreign. There is no other way of putting it and it was confirmed by the UN this week.

a group of people in uniform holding flags and a flagPhoto by Rusty Watson on Unsplash

(It was once, make the world England. Now, it’s make England foreign.)

No wonder the government both Conservative and Labour, wanted to bury this Afghan relocation story, shove it down the memory hole and never have to mention it again. This isn’t just a scandal or an outrage. This is failed state territory.

The RAF in the Battle of Britain famously kept the Nazis at bay. Generations of Brits have been raised on their tales of heroism and selfless devotion to their country; they stood and fought to keep the invaders out. Now the RAF are used to fly the invaders in. This isn’t normal. Neither is it normal to escort thousands of military aged men from France into your country, as the Royal National Lifeboat Institution with HM Coastguard are obliged to do. Never in the history of Britain has so much been wrecked by so few.

The same state that has shipped in at least 30,000 Afghans in has also utterly failed to stop the small boats of illegal immigrants, mostly men of military age, from arriving on British shores. There have been 21,1117 so far in 2025, 14K in 2024, 12K in 2023, 13K in 2022, 6.5K in 2021, 2500 in 2020, 638 in 2019 and 11 in 2018, as per Sky.

The same state in the same week then jailed two morons for four years and three months for cutting down a very nice tree that was over 100 years old. Basket case Britain.

Listen, I liked the Sycamore Gap tree as much as the next person. I love and am a member of the National Trust and anyone who reads this Substack knows that there is nothing, absolutely nothing I like more than going for a wood walk. I’m the kind of person who would have chained myself to the Sycamore Gap Tree, if I could have saved it. But it’s just a tree.

Sure, it appeared in Robin Hood Prince of Thieves (great movie) and people loved to get a photo of it ‘for socials’ and when these two fools felled the tree in the middle of the night, it also fell on Hadrian’s Wall, a Unesco heritage site. But it’s just a fucking tree, for fuck sake. Monsters who abuse children could get less than 4 years and 3 months. Basket case Britain.

It might be worth remembering the reason for Hadrian’s Wall. It was built by the Romans to prevent invasions and raids from tribes in the north. Interesting. Some believe the Romans were inspired to build it having heard of the Great Wall of China, also built to prevent invasions. But what did the ancients know about protecting territory and culture? Can’t see the Romans heading up the north to invite those troublesome tribes into the Empire ‘because human rights.’ But that’s just a guess.

Anyway, where was I. Whatever way you look at it, jailing two men for cutting down a tree, even one that people like to put on their Instagram, is madness. It is madness when the very same State invites men from completely different cultures into their already overcrowded country. Not a single person will be held responsible for the £7 billion email leak resulting in nearly 25,000 Afghans being relocated to Britain but which do you think has caused more damage?

Sure, Daniel Graham and Adam Carruthers wielded a chainsaw against a famous tree but it was those Ministers and MPs with the Sirs and titles who have been taking a chainsaw to Britain and the British way of life for years. And what’s more they didn’t even want you to know about it.


This article (The invasion of Britain) was created and published by Laura Perrins and is republished here under “Fair Use”

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*