The electronic cottage: how technology causes family breakdown
NIALL MCCRAE
Alvin Toffler, whose prophetic book Future Shock (1970) primed sociologists and politicians for radical change to society as a result of technological advances, was in a position ten years later to show how much of his vision was being realised. In The Third Wave: the Revolution that will Change Our Lives (1980) he described how the industrial economy was sinking and taking the family structure down with it.
In the First Wave of human organisation (the agricultural revolution) three or more generations lived together as a family unit. The Second Wave (the industrial revolution) created the nuclear family, and Toffler saw that the coming Third Wave would undermine and eventually destroy this living arrangement. Conservative-minded readers might want to shoot the messenger, but undoubtedly Toffler was right on how conventional families would disintegrate. At the school gates today, there are single mothers, gay and lesbian parents, older relatives and various arrangements under child custody orders, and in some areas a stable home of mum and dad bringing up children is the exception rather than the rule.
In a time of exploding change – with personal lives being torn apart, the existing social order crumbling, and a fantastic new way of life emerging on the horizon – asking the very largest of questions about our future is not merely a matter of intellectual curiosity. It is a matter of survival.
Just as industry is being outmoded by the ‘technosphere’, the nuclear family would be replaced in the ‘sociosphere’ of the Third Wave. In his chapter ‘Families of the Future’, Toffler decried political leaders (at the time, Jimmy Carter) for pledging to restore family values. He criticised the tendency to place fault in individual people or to blame rock music, pornography or feminism for family breakdown. The only way to save the idealised family would be to reverse technological progress.
The Third Wave was already happening, Toffler observed: millions of Americans living alone, single parents, a steadily rising population of divorcees, cohabiting (rather than married) couples, households with children of different parents, and homosexual relationships. In this ‘maze of kinship arrangements’, no single form would dominate. Toffler predicted homosexual couples raising children and speculated on the possibility of cloning.
Describing the ‘electronic cottage’, Toffler correctly anticipated working from home on computers, although his illustration was influenced by heterosexual norms and the manufacturing economy: –
We might find both husband and wife taking turns at monitoring a complex manufacturing process on the console screen, four hours on, four hours off.
Foreseeing dramatic change to working lives, Toffler argued that technology was the determinant of how people live together (or apart). Indeed, ‘the very definition of love would be transformed’.
Communes, popular in the 1960s and 70s, mostly failed, but Toffler predicted the rise of extended families evolving in the electronic economy.
Networks of expanded families could supply some needed business or social service. Internally, they might or might not share sex across marriage lines. They might or might not be heterosexual. They might be childless or childful.
Politicians should embrace change rather than row against the tide, Toffler opined.
The decision to live outside a nuclear family framework should be made easier not harder.
Conservative commentators warn of civilisational collapse, but Toffler was optimistic that people would adapt and willingly participate in the creation of a new civilisation. Klaus Schwab’s ‘Great Reset’ was simply building on the blueprint for a new society envisaged by the shocking futurist.
This article (The no-nonsense way to stop the boats) was created and published by Conservative Woman and is republished here under “Fair Use”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply