TWO-TIER STARMER’S PATHETIC RESPONSE TO THE RALLY
PAUL SUTTON
Keir Starmer’s nasally weasel words, on X:
People have a right to peaceful protest. It is core to our country’s values.
But we will not stand for assaults on police officers doing their job or for people feeling intimidated on our streets because of their background or the colour of their skin.
Britain is a nation proudly built on tolerance, diversity and respect. Our flag represents our diverse country and we will never surrender it to those that use it as a symbol of violence, fear and division.
Then this brilliant reply, by Jim Chimerie:
You talk of “peaceful protest” as if the crowd in Whitehall was defined by the handful who lashed out. Hundreds of thousands marched behind their own flag – families, pensioners, workers – and you smear them all as thugs. Violence is wrong. Nobody serious disputes that. But you twist the acts of a few into a moral cudgel to delegitimise the many. That isn’t leadership. It’s evasion.
You speak of people “feeling intimidated because of their background or the colour of their skin.” Yet it is not Jewish children hounded off buses that concern you. It is not young girls preyed upon by imported grooming gangs. It is not women threatened by men from cultures that see them as chattel. Those victims vanish from your concern. What you mean by “intimidation” is simply the sight of your own countrymen standing up for themselves.
And then your sleight of hand: you claim the Union Jack “represents our diverse country.” No. The flag does not represent whatever passing ideology a Prime Minister chooses to drape across it. It represents Britain – its history, its duty, its people. To redefine it as a corporate logo for “diversity and respect” is to strip it of meaning. You say you will never surrender the flag. But you already have – not to Tommy Robinson, not to rallies in Whitehall, but to the very forces that are dismantling the nation beneath it.
That is the truth across the West. In Britain, in America, in Europe, the Left has hollowed out symbols, institutions, and traditions, then handed them over to supranational dogmas and imported loyalties. The flag is reduced to a backdrop for speeches about “tolerance.” The police are reduced to political enforcers, indulgent with pro-Palestine mobs yet heavy-handed with patriots. The language of “diversity” becomes a mask for mass immigration that no public ever consented to.
You want to claim the mantle of order, but you preside over disorder. You want to pose as a defender of the flag, but you recast it as a brand for the very policies that betray the people it belongs to. That is why the streets filled. Not because of violence. Not because of extremism. But because the nation knows it has been sold off – piece by piece, principle by principle.
So don’t lecture Britain about “never surrendering the flag.” You and your kind surrendered it long ago. The question now is not whether people will reclaim it, but when – and whether they can do so peacefully, with discipline, before the anger you have sown breaks the country apart.
“The flag does not represent whatever passing ideology a Prime Minister chooses to drape across it. It represents Britain – its history, its duty, its people.”
This article (TWO-TIER STARMER’S PATHETIC RESPONSE TO THE RALLY) was created and published by Paul Sutton and is republished here under “Fair Use”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply