Starmer’s demise is like the final minute of the spin cycle: never ending.
SEAN WALSH
I suppose part of the fun in making political predictions is the post-hoc analysis of “why I was right when I said this would happen and it didn’t”. And knowing you can be serially wrong without any professional consequence.
There’s quite a bit of this about at the moment, much of it tied into Starmer eschatology. We’ve been living through this premiership’s “end of times” stage for quite a while now. So long it’s beginning to feel like that existentially distressing “final minute” of the washing machine cycle. The bit that always feels like a taunt.
According to political experts, Starmer became a dead man walking after the Rayner resignation, continued the zombie thing right through Mandelson 3, then was on borrowed time after miscellaneous humiliations unforced political errors, only to be given a reprieve which would allow him to stumble on until Christmas (still dead presumably), and is now expected to be forced out after the disastrous (and now doomed-to-be-hypothetical) results of the cancelled local government elections.
None of this has happened yet, nor is it likely to. The pundits, or political scientists, are applying Newton’s laws to a quantum paradigm. Politics has moved from post-truth to post-shame and it’s time to decommission the old modelling. What’s that? Can a prime minister survive losing his chancellor? Don’t be ridiculous. That’s like saying light can be a particle and a wave simultaneously.
Or going back further, our journalists would be happily situated in antique times, describing the cycles of the weather as if they were plotlines in a soap opera of the gods, gods whose motives, methodologies and mythologies are understood only by smart people such as themselves.
And so the punditry class is in spasm as it struggles to stay relevant. As tends to happen with paradigm shifts what are clearly falsifying events are interpreted as if they are of little significance.
Starmer isn’t going anywhere until he is given permission to get down from the dinner table by whoever it is that’s handling him. Andy Burnham has now found this out the hard way.
As I write this the Labour Party Nomenklatura National Executive Committee has voted (when they should have been in Mass) 8-1 against giving permission to the King of the North to stand in the by-election caused by the resignation of Andrew Gwynne. Mr Gwynne has stood down on health grounds, having developed a medical condition which causes him to wish death on the people who elected him as their MP (we wish him a speedy recovery, thoughts and prayers etc).
I don’t know about you but I feel cheated. For several reasons.
Firstly, a Burnham candidacy would have confirmed to even the most tribal Labour supporters that in the court of Labour politics everything is transactional, and that even the mayoralty of a (formerly) great city is just one more fungible unit in the economy of personal ambition.
Secondly, there is the squandered comedic opportunity. It is improbable that the former Health Secretary could have plotted a path to the leadership given the hidden variables and incalculable contingencies involved. I suspect that whatever plan he had would be less Francis Urquhart and more like one of those strategies employed by Compo, Clegg and Foggy in every episode of Last of the Summer Wine to turn a bathtub into a bicycle and ride it down a hill.
Third, we’d have had the aforementioned commentator class predicting the outcome of every stage of this process and its implications for the rest of us, getting it wrong, and carrying on with a shamelessness they’ve contracted from the politicians with whom they speak, dine and (in many cases) sleep.
There is no petty legalism, no Jesuitical real-life adjacent meretricious stratagem, so counterintuitive or plain evil that Starmer’s programmers won’t deploy it when useful. Which is not to deny the Prime Minister’s own moral dysfunctionality. Within the monochromatic world he inhabits he’s shown himself capable of carving out some very nasty shades of grey.
Starmer’s going nowhere but the pundits are now into sunk cost fallacy territory, so you won’t hear that from them.
The spin cycle goes on. Interminably.
This article (Starmer’s demise is like the final minute of the spin cycle: never ending.) was created and published by Sean Walsh and is republished here under “Fair Use”
See Related Article Below
Who needs The Traitors with Labour’s Burnham saga for entertainment?
DANNY LOCKWOOD
THEY may be conspiring like Roman senators in the wood-panelled nooks of Parliament, huddled in backstreet pubs beyond the curious ears of the Strangers’ Bar, or furiously thumb-tapping in WhatsApp groups. What the Labour Party’s MPs are certainly doing is raising feverish night-time sweats amongst themselves that London probably hasn’t seen since the Plague.
Boy, but this ramshackle, amateurish collective (most of them newly elected, mind) have been rapidly infected with the long-observed Westminster condition I identify as SITT – Snouts In The Trough.
It’s their turn, their heads are down, backsides in the air as they gorge on ‘power and influence’ (and financial opportunity). Very little else matters except survival and immediate advancement.
Running the country? Tackling inflation, the national debt, stopping boats loaded with what is tacitly recognised as an invading force? Their constituents . . . remember them?
With a raging outbreak of Burnham Syndrome transfixing Labour, yesterday’s publicly approved medicine was a dose of ‘Just tell them we’re launching the UK’s version of America’s FBI. Labour, tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime . . .’
The only wonder with that latest non-manifestoed, meaningless act of distraction was that Starmer’s goons didn’t decide to call it the UK’s version of America’s ICE law enforcement agency.
Actually, hold that throwaway thought; such a radical policy might engage a public that almost universally despises Labour. Heaven forfend that this witless, self-indulgent Cabinet should tap into a populist mood that would probably unite 90 per cent of the country.
Anything to distract from the Burnham embarrassment though, at least until Starmer could hastily board his flight to China, where the good Lord alone knows how much British sovereignty he will be willing to surrender. Apparently it won’t be the Chagos Islands via their Mauritius proxy, a rare beacon in the dark.
Labour’s National Executive Committee achieved near-unanimity in dismissing Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham’s bare-faced bid to unseat the Prime Minister. Only Starmer’s enemy-in-plain-sight, the party’s deputy leader Lucy Powell, had the courage to pin her colours to the rebels’ mast as the rest pretended loyalty to the chief. For now.
That the NEC resorted to the hilarious excuse that it would be too expensive to run a mayoral election campaign, given the millions and billions of waste they burn through daily, was an extra layer of imaginative icing this cake really didn’t require.
Burnham’s threat has been parked for now, which I consider a shame. It would have been a fabulous opportunity for the wider Parliamentary parties to give both him and Starmer the biggest of public slaps in the face.
Disgraced/resigned MP Andrew Gwynne landed 51 per cent of the vote in 2024 in the newly formed seat of Gorton and Denton, but I suspect the by-election will see angry folk queuing up make their feelings about Labour abundantly clear, no matter who is standing.
That will still leave long odds for Reform? Possibly. But not if the Tories decline to put up a candidate, which would save their own embarrassment for the moment, while exacerbating Starmer’s and chopping off Burnham’s political treason/ambitions at the knees. That could be a win-win.
So, will Labour MPs’ temperatures and tempers have subsided for the time being at least? Oh, I doubt it. Those pub huddles, those WhatsApp groups, the closet allegiances being sought or bought, the fuses of rebellion have been well and truly lit. In public. Starmer’s nightmares will not have been soothed by the time he returns from taking a disgraceful knee to Chinese president Xi Jinping.
Who needs The Traitors when you have the British Labour Party for outrageous (if ruinous) entertainment?
This article (Who needs The Traitors with Labour’s Burnham saga for entertainment?) was created and published by Conservative Woman and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Danny Lockwood
The Chinese with their gold hoard, are dismantling The West’s fiat financial system by way of the paper derivatives markets. Protect yourself: buy gold and silver, while it is still cheap (in fiat currency).