Starmer’s changed Labour Party is even worse than the Tories

Watch as Starmer partners with Blackrock and carves up the UK into mini tax havens where profit is king and public services can go to hell.

EUROPEANPOWELL

Special Economic Zones??? It goes like this: break up a nation, subdivide the land, invite foreign venture capitalists in, and hand over powers of governance to them while reducing elected government oversight.

Labour’s promises of British growth, building houses, helping working people, are a double-edged sword. The template for these duplicitous promises goes back to Brexit, banging on about sovereignty, and being unshackled from EU red tape aka regulation. Labour’s recent Investment Summit championed deregulation without even mentioning Brexit. You do not make these unicorn promises in an economic climate that has been bulldozed by deregulation for 4 years, where companies come first and foremost over the working population, that’s a scam right there. Labour’s track record so far has been to punish and humiliate those considered unproductive for their ludicrous growth model, the poor and infirm. That in itself is typical of the neoliberal attitude towards the welfare state.

Brexit deregulation is the cash cow for malign corporate interests whose agenda is not just to make more astronomical profits but also to influence via lobbying the corporate political model as an alternative to social governance. This neatly dovetails with Starmer’s changed Labour Party and the expulsion of the socialist left thanks to Morgan McSweeney and Peter Mandelson. From the very outset of Starmer’s rise to power, Blair’s PFI model was the bedrock for what we see and hear from Rachel Reeves, Lisa Nandy, Liz Kendall, Angela Rayner and Wes Streeting. This is a new incarnation of the capitalist rights class war, embedding itself into the frenemies’ political ideology, illustrated by the pointless Parliamentary rituals and exchanges we see performed as weekly pantomime. The Brexit framework for a corporate coup is wholly dependent on Special Economic Zones, the Tories started the initiative, Labour are continuing it. SEZs are the perfect form (albeit a Trojan Horse one) for downsizing big govt into more manageable ‘localized freedoms’, but you need a lot of zones to reconfigure a country’s economic infrastructure, there are 74 SEZs and 12 Freeports on the go in England, Scotland, and Wales. Brexit resurrected Thatcher’s SEZs which failed because they came up against the EU regulations on State aid.

I have not read one article from the MSM that writes the truth about this, you can however read about this on the govt’s website. https://t.co/yXz81mphtF

SEZs carve out entire regions of a host country with the aim to eventually capture the state by first embedding licenses with secondary legislation, meaning zero Parliamentary or public scrutiny, quashing all dissent by shutting down access for protestors to the vicinity of any factory or corporate body, this is the cover for companies to make up their own rules in the corporate protections and boundaries of the zone known as ‘self-regulation’. Secondly, you extend the licenses for SEZs for decades, UK SEZs are licensed for 25 years with tax breaks set at 10 years, companies are already pushing to extend their corporate tax breaks beyond the deadline.

Once deregulated SEZs are up and running, they become a catchall for all public services including construction of railways, laying out streets and roads, building private and public buildings, schools, churches, public utilities, hotels, courts, restaurants, council assets, and hospitals. All of these aspects are deemed ‘small potatoes’ for libertarians, their ultimate expansionary goal is for total privatisation of the host country under corporate governance. So what happens to areas and economies outside the zones? They will be forced to conform to the corporate political model within a few years.

I warned about this years ago, now watch Starmer’s changed Labour Party finish off the Tories dirty work, and privatise the UK with Blackrock as their partner in crime.

This article (Starmer’s changed Labour Party is even worse than the Tories) was published by EuropeanPowell and is republished here under “Fair Use” 

Featured image: https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.