The Chagos Islands are home to Diego Garcia, a military base of significant strategic importance, particularly for operations in the Middle East, South Asia, and Africa. Scene Camera Operator: PH2 Frazier. Copyright: Public Domain.
CP
Keir Starmer’s agreement to hand sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius could end up costing the British public as much as £47 billion, according to new research.
The Prime Minister has faced mounting criticism for what opponents describe as a “surrender” of the British Indian Ocean Territory. Dame Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, warned: “Labour’s Chagos surrender deal will hit British taxpayers hard for the next century with billions being paid to fund tax cuts in a foreign country.”
She added: “Labour ministers have consistently misled the British people on the true costs and sought to cover up this appalling deal. Conservatives will keep fighting against this surrender of British sovereignty and Labour’s abuse of taxpayers’ money.”
An earlier Labour government estimate suggested the net present cost of the deal was £3.4 billion, while ministers dismissed alternative figures ranging from £9 billion to £18 billion as “absolutely wide of the mark.” However, The Telegraph previously revealed that internal calculations put the cost closer to £35 billion over the 99-year term.
Now, the TaxPayers’ Alliance claims the true figure could climb higher still, with their analysis suggesting the final bill could reach £47 billion, equivalent to roughly a quarter of the annual NHS budget or 14 new aircraft carriers.
Inflation Assumptions Challenged
The campaign group argues that the Treasury used a “highly optimistic” inflation forecast of 2.3 per cent when estimating costs. By contrast, long-term gilt yields imply that markets expect average inflation of around 2.9 per cent over the next century.
Darwin Friend, the group’s head of research, said:
“The grim reality for British taxpayers is that the Chagos surrender is likely to cost even more than has previously been revealed. Reeves’s inflationary economic policies mean that the Government’s estimates for inflation look to be highly optimistic given the market’s own forecasts as can be seen in gilt yields. The Chancellor should be demanding that the Prime Minister urgently cancel this deal, saving the country from a national humiliation as well as helping to plug the fiscal black hole.”
With the projected costs now disputed, pressure is growing on the Labour Government to justify its decision. For critics, the £47 billion estimate underscores what they view as a costly concession of sovereignty.
The second reading of the Chagos Bill is due in Parliament tomorrow (9 September 2025).
This article (Starmer’s Chagos Giveaway Could Cost British Taxpayers £47 Billion, Analysis Warns) was created and published by Conservative Post and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author CP
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply