MIGRATION WATCH UK
Homes provided by local councils and housing associations are a vital lifeline for some of the most vulnerable people in Britain. While they are expensive (with an implied subsidy of tens of billions per year), they are worth preserving as a final lifeline for Brits who, through no fault of their own, either cannot work or who cannot afford to buy or pay for private accommodation.
The advent of mass migration into Britain has seen social housing turn from a last resort for the vulnerable into a first resort for economic migrants. Today, 1 in 5 social homes in England and Wales are occupied by someone born overseas – or almost one million (taxpayer subsidised) homes in total. It’s even worse in our urban centres, which tend to have higher rents and thus higher social home subsidies than the country overall.
In London, for example, the average social housing rent is £117 per week compared to £518 per week in the private sector. Is it any wonder young people struggle to buy and rent, and end up living in family homes or dependent on their parents?
As for building sufficient homes to meet demand, this can never happen while migration remains at its current levels. The 755,000 people added to our population in the year to mid-2024 (98% due to immigration) would require 343,000 homes given the average UK household size of 2.2 people. However, only a net 221,070 new homes were built over the same period.
As of the 2021 census, immigrants occupied:
- 47.6% of London’s social housing stock (59.7% in Westminster)
- 32.8% of Birmingham’s social housing stock (69.2% in North Central and Dartmouth Circus)
- 31.7% of Manchester’s social housing stock (64.7% in Moss Side West)
- 38.1% of Leicester’s social housing stock (80.4% in St Matthews and Highfields North!)
This week, we also discovered – courtesy of Rob Bates at the Centre for Migration Control – that almost 2 million foreign citizens are claiming some form of benefit, including Universal Credit, Child Allowance, Disability Benefit or Pension Credit.
It’s clear that mass migration into Britain is only sustained with equally massive subsidies from the British taxpayer. It shouldn’t be controversial to say that British citizens born in Britain should be given priority over migrants for social housing and benefits paid for by British taxpayers.
To learn more about the number of immigrants living in social housing in your local area, please check MIGRATIONFACTS.COM.
This week, we suggest you write to your MP about the high numbers of immigrants living in social housing in England and Wales. You can write anything you like, but we have provided a template below for your convenience.
You can verify your local MP here: https://members.parliament.uk/FindYourMP.
“Dear [NAME OF MP],
I am one of your constituents, living at [YOUR ADDRESS HERE].
I am writing to express my concern at widespread abuse of social housing. As you know, social housing is an invaluable lifeline for vulnerable Brits who cannot support themselves. However, during a housing crisis where some British people are waiting years or even decades for suitable accommodation, I was shocked to discover almost 1 in 5 social homes is currently occupied by someone born overseas.
I cannot understand why it would be in the best interests of our country for people born in Britain to be homeless, while people who have migrated here are given priority access to subsidised social housing.
Please could you write to the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, Steve Reed MP, and request an explanation for why local authorities are still permitted to prioritise people born overseas ahead of people born in Britain for limited social housing? May I also respectfully ask where you stand on the matter.
Kind regards,
[YOUR NAME HERE]
If you receive a response from your MP and are comfortable sharing it, please forward it on to us – we are always interested!
The number of small boat migrants to cross the Channel in 2025 surpassed 2024’s total this week, and is currently just 2% behind 2022, the previous worst year on record. Clear weather in the Channel over the next few weeks would almost certainly see 2025 become the worst year ever for illegal Channel crossings.
Political commentator Charlie Cole has shared a graph showing the incredible number of Health and Care Worker visas issued between 2021 and 2025 – three quarters of which have gone to dependants, rather than workers:
A true scandal.
In 2024 specifically, 75% of health and are worker visas issued went to dependants, not the workers themselves. https://t.co/HJOsIJf4cZ pic.twitter.com/YX7STLWzn9
— Charlie Cole (@CharliePCole98) October 19, 2025
And independent journalist Max Tempers has published a new Freedom of Information Act discovery revealing 20% of all unworthy vehicle offences in the UK were committed by people with non-British driving licences:
No data exists on what proportion of drivers in Britain are foreign licence holders – most estimate a few % at most.
However, through an FOI obtained exclusively, we found that an astonishing 20% of all offences for unroadworthy vehicles were committed by non-GB licence holders. https://t.co/7bHHGD8HFm pic.twitter.com/sno8tPgmLI
— max tempers (@maxtempers) October 24, 2025
Finally, former Downing Street special advisor Sam Richards pithily sums up the immigrant social housing problem:
It’s worth saying starkly: we are paying for tens of thousands of people who were not born in Britain, many of whom are not in work, to live in parts of our capital that the vast majority of Brits are priced out of due to our failure to build enough homes and control immigration https://t.co/sClRueEdhu
— Sam Richards (@sjarichards) October 20, 2025
Our research finding that Keir Starmer’s returns deal with France would take almost 300 years to remove all the small boat migrants which have entered Britain since the last election was picked up by several outlets, including the Mail, GB News, and Breitbart:
Migration Watch chairman, Alp Mehmet, said: ‘This is not a legacy to look back on with pride, Prime Minister.
‘Moreover, if we receive one migrant back for each one we return, we will have the same number plus new arrivals to fend for.
‘The public have had enough of fibs and bluster.’
Finally, Alp appeared on GB News to discuss our research into immigrant-occupied social housing; you can view an excerpt from the segment here.
Our Chairman, Alp Mehmet, also wrote an editorial for the Express on the same subject:
When Sir Keir Starmer swept into Downing Street in July last year, he told us he would “smash the gangs” and “stop the boats”. Fifteen months later, that promise lies in tatters. Almost 60,000 small boat migrants have crossed since the General Election – and just 42 have been returned to France under the so-called ‘one in, one out’ deal. Meanwhile, on Wednesday, we learned that one of the 42 returned to France has already made his way back.
Alp was also quoted in three other Express articles about migration this week, which you can read here, here and here.
Our small boats tracker, which records the number of migrants who have illegally crossed the Channel since 2018, was the basis of several stories this week concerning the number of migrants who have crossed in 2025 exceeding the number who crossed in 2024 overall, including the Express, and the Conservative Woman.
SOURCE: Migration Watch UK newsletter
See Related Article Below
Unlimited immigration: A policy of destruction
RHODA WILSON
Unlimited immigration in Western countries is causing native infrastructure to collapse, leading to overcrowding and strain on public services.
The policy of unlimited immigration is deliberate. The aim is to erase nations, families and communities, and create social unrest and conflict. The goal is to advance the New World Order.
Unlimited immigration is encouraged in all Western countries, with the result that the native infrastructure cannot cope. That is plainly quite deliberate. Back in 2004, Prime Minister Tony Blair was warned that allowing free movement into the UK from ten new EU countries (mostly Eastern and Central Europe) would put pressure on housing, benefits, hospitals and health services and infrastructure.
Blair, an unconvicted war criminal and puppet and a long-term tool or servant of the conspirators (who has become exceedingly rich by promoting their interests and betraying the people he was initially employed to protect and represent), ignored the warnings and the following explosion in immigration has done irreparable damage to race relations as well as Britain’s infrastructure. Twenty years ago, England was the most overcrowded country in the world (ignoring Monaco and Vatican City). Today, it is hardly surprising that nothing works anymore. Every aspect of public service has collapsed. I find it impossible not to believe that everything that is happening is part of their “terrifying plan.”
Mass immigration, now deliberately allowed to go out of control in most Western countries, is ignored by all left-wing politicians and defended by lawyers. Anyone who mentions the subject (and discusses the problems caused by overcrowding, infrastructure which cannot cope and so on) is attacked as a racist with their concerns dismissed and ignored.
Immigrants (whether legal or not) and their lawyers have been adept at finding ways to avoid deportation. One immigrant was apparently allowed to stay in England after telling a court that his son didn’t like the chicken McNuggets which were available in other countries.
And offences seem to be ignored when applications to stay are considered.
Immigration is a problem worldwide, but nowhere is there more anger than in the UK where it was revealed that illegal immigrants who had just arrived in the country were being given priority consultations with GPs and receiving same-day treatment. There was considerable surprise among the elite at the modest amount of resentment this engendered among the native population, who had to wait weeks to see a GP and years to be treated in hospital. Inevitably, anyone who voiced their sense of resentment found themselves quickly dismissed as racist.
Politicians claim that immigration is needed to boost their nation’s population size (shrinking because young couples who are working cannot afford to have any or many children – largely as a result of high taxes, which are partly necessary to help fund the massive multibillion pound cost of providing for immigrants who either do not contribute or are not allowed to contribute by working).
Curiously, the politicians never seem to notice that the immigrants pouring into the UK (for example) consist almost exclusively of young, fighting age men who do not understand or admire our culture, do not speak English, are not accompanied by wives or girlfriends and largely seem to be content to be accommodated in four star hotels where they are fed and given money while they wait. Just what they are waiting for is a mystery, though it is possible that they are simply waiting for Beckett’s Godot to turn up and tell us all what is going on.
The suppressed truth is that the aim of the conspirators is to change the world by erasing nations, families and communities and by destroying everything humans consider to be personal and valuable. Immigration (whether legal or illegal) is encouraged to create impoverishment, resentment, racism, terrorism and plenty of excuses for war. (As an aside, it used to be thought that patriotism was good but nationalism was bad. Today, however, both are unacceptable because there can be no countries in the New World Order.)
Those inclined to dismiss this short essay as “racist” may like to read it again and see if they can find any reference or remark that can possibly be criticised as “racist.”
Note: For details of Vernon Coleman’s book `Their Terrifying Plan’, please CLICK HERE.
This article (Unlimited immigration: A policy of destruction) was created and published by The Expose and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Rhoda Wilson
.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply