Rural and Coastal Communities Cannot Withstand the Battering Labour Is Giving Them

Victoria Atkins: Rural and coastal communities cannot withstand the battering Labour is giving them

VICTORIA ATKINS

Victoria Atkins is Shadow Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

When Kemi Badenoch became Leader of the Opposition, I asked to serve as Shadow Secretary of State for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. After running a budget the size of Greece’s GDP as Health Secretary, some might question my move to the Defra portfolio – often seen as a junior Cabinet role with a “modest” £8 billion budget.

That’s not how I see it. DEFRA covers the essentials: the food we eat, air we breathe and water we drink. It protects the countryside, coasts and seas for future generations, and supports the people and businesses behind them. These are core Conservative issues and vital to national security.

Rural and coastal Britain now faces a new threat: a city-centric socialist government that neither understands nor values them. The most obvious assault is the Family Farm Tax. Since the election, Labour has undermined the rural economy. In the Chancellor’s Budget of broken promises, they targeted family farms and businesses with a death tax on those at the front line of our food security.

It was a Conservative government that introduced Agricultural and Business Property Relief to help families pass down farms and enterprises as many are asset-rich and cash-poor. This principle-free Labour government’s plans will reverse that progress.

The economic impact – suppressing investment and growth – is bad, but the human impact is worse. A coroner’s Inquest has found recently that a farmer took his own life over fears about these tax changes. I’ve heard from advisers, friends and relatives of others in distress. Labour’s tax policies are causing people to contemplate suicide and even decline cancer treatment. How can ministers and MPs look themselves in the mirror?

Family farms and businesses have this pledge from the Conservatives: we will axe the Family Farm and Family Firm taxes to protect our food security and preserve generational businesses.

The rise in employer National Insurance contributions hits the countryside too. It’s a Jobs Tax. In the last quarter alone, 100,000 jobs were lost, including roles in farming, hospitality, and small manufacturing – key rural sectors. They also quietly scrapped support which helped locals save rural pubs. These are social hubs, employers, and vital to community life. Without support, many will be boarded up for good.

Labour’s disregard for the rural economy is no accident; it’s a symptom of a governing party who appointed an Environment Secretary in the pocket of Number 10. There is no evidence that Steve Reed defends the countryside from the Chancellor.

That’s why we shouldn’t be surprised when Labour makes chaotic decisions with no prior engagement – like cancelling the Sustainable Farming Incentive scheme overnight. This is the scheme which replaced the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy and paid farmers to preserve our countryside.

Farmers cannot plan for the long term if support is yanked away without warning. They are custodians of 70 per cent of the UK’s land and without them, we will fail environmental goals and risk our future food security.

No mention of the Family Farm Tax. No real rural plan. No detail on how cuts will hit communities. That puts nature, farming, and food security at risk. Our rural and coastal communities also face uncertainty from Labour’s trade deals.

British beef producers now face 13,000 metric tonnes of tariff-free American beef. American farmers are subsidised, operate on different economies of scale, and play by different rules and standards nor do they face the Family Farm Tax. Meanhile British farmers are being undercut while Labour saddles them with more taxes. Donald Trump wrote the book on the art of the deal. Sir Keir Starmer folded.

On our coastline, fishermen are furious about Labour’s 12-year deal with the EU. Starmer gave away our fisheries, showing no concern for coastal families who face down foreign trawlers daily. Whilst the Conservatives were working towards a better deal, Labour sank the industry. This has long-term consequences for both our economy and marine environment which will be felt long after this Prime Minister ultimately has to resign.

This is why our Policy Renewal Programme is so important. Against this backdrop, my job is to build a hopeful, forward-looking vision for our countryside and coast.

As part of the programme, my team and I are touring the UK, gathering ideas from farmers, fishermen and rural businesses. We’re hosting events in auction marts, attending agricultural shows, and visiting farms across the country. We have the energy, enthusiasm and determination to develop policies for the future of Britain.

Rural and coastal communities must be central to the next Conservative manifesto. That means a full review of the factors shaping their prosperity.

But this isn’t just Defra’s job. As Labour’s weak Environment Secretary has shown, you need full Cabinet support. Improving rural life – from economy and infrastructure to housing, education, and healthcare – needs a joined-up government approach. We are working to build that. And I want to hear from you.


This article (Victoria Atkins: Rural and coastal communities cannot withstand the battering Labour is giving them) was created and published by Conservative Home and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Victoria Atkins

See Related Article Below

Labour’s war on rural Britain goes far deeper than farms

The Government has just under eight months to think again

JAMIE BLACKETT

It comes as no surprise to learn that a record number of farms were forced to close since the budget, each closure no doubt accompanied by generational agony, mental breakdown and even suicide.

Here in Galloway, we have done the sums and concluded that if I was to go under the proverbial bus after April 26 – and fortunately buses are rare as hens’ teeth in this part of the world – there is no way my son would be able carry on with the additional cost of over £100,000 each year out of taxed income for ten years to pay the obnoxious “family farm tax”.

He is keen to take over and become the seventh generation to look after this corner of paradise, so we have decided to soldier on in the hope that Rachel Reeves is moved from Accounts and a new chancellor follows the advice of the National Farmers Union and almost every sane economist, even Labour’s own Dan Neidle, and modifies the tax so it would only become payable if my son decided to sell a short time after inheriting – the so-called clawback, as they have in a number of other countries.

I can understand, though, why others have opted to cash in their farms while land values are relatively high (that won’t last at this rate) and opt for an easier life. The family farm tax isn’t the only challenge; the extra National Insurance has put greater pressure on family labour. We have shed one worker here as a consequence.

Soldiering on now involves paying for extortionate legal advice and life insurance premiums that we can’t really afford (now there’s a wealth tax if ever there was one). One unforeseen consequence of the misguided budget has been a transfer of wealth from “working people” in the countryside to fat cat lawyers and insurance giants.

The other consequence is that tractor sales are at their lowest level since 1998. Instead of gearing up to invest in our farms to meet the challenge of competing with American and Antipodean farmers since the trade deals, we are focussing on dealing with a threat closer to home: the Government. Ironically our overseas competitors don’t have the same cost of inheritance tax; there is none in New Zealand and in the United States even some ducal estates would fall below the threshold.

Because Labour lied about changing agricultural property relief right up until the Chancellor stood at the despatch box, the policy was not trailed. If it had been properly “war-gamed” all of the negatives would have been exposed. For example, if we do have to sell up we will break up. Here on the coast in a tourism destination, rather than let BlackRock or any other of Labour’s globalist friends get their hands on one inch of it, we would parcel each house up with land and sell it as a collection of hobby farms.

So gone would be a highly productive dairy farm producing over 3 million litres of milk a year and beef to help with our food security. Gone too would be the affordable housing in our rented cottages, to be replaced by a series of desirable weekend retreats, donkey sanctuaries, llama farms and wilding projects – all, incidentally, would be below the family farm tax threshold. Instead of meeting the Government’s policies of driving down food price inflation and dealing with the housing crisis, the family farms tax works against them.

The Telegraph: continue reading

Featured image: iStock

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*