Problem-Reaction-Solution: Britain is falling apart at the seams, a digital ID will fix everything, Tony Blair says

RHODA WILSON

It is now becoming beyond ridiculous that people are unable, or refuse, to see what’s right in front of them, that there is an orchestrated demolition of national institutions, customs and laws to bring about a centralised, global system of control.

For those who doubt, Blair has laid out how they will use perceived crises – manufactured or deliberately worsened to serve their purposes – to implement digital IDs in the UK.

In an article written by Tony “war criminal” Blair published by the Daily Mail yesterday titled ‘Tony Blair: Taxes are high. The NHS is coming apart at the seams. We need a once-in-a-generation disruption. Here’s what could change everything’, Blair makes a “confident prediction.”

“In the not too distant future, British people will all have their own unique digital identifier and will make most transactions through their phone, as citizens with government and as customers with firms,” he threatens.

After describing the problem as he perceives it, Blair concludes, “Our present system isn’t working. This is a time for shaking up. For once-in-a-generation disruption. Digital ID is a good place to start.” It’s curious why Blair, or possibly the Daily Mail, capitalises “Digital” as if it were a proper noun rather than the common noun that it is.

Aside from the psychology embedded into the text with the use of a capital letter for a common noun, is anyone surprised Blair is droning on about digital IDs, yet again? You shouldn’t be.

Fabian socialist Tony Blair, who has a track record of lying and was convicted in absentia as a war criminal, has been trying for years to push, first national IDs and now, digital IDs onto the British people and people around the world.

‘Taxes are high. The NHS is coming apart at the seams. We need a once-in-a-generation disruption. Here’s what could change everything’, so says Tony Blair

A Vision for a Digital Britain

Tony Blair predicts that soon, British people will have a unique digital identifier and conduct most transactions through their phones, making processes faster, cheaper and more reliable.

The reasoning he offers for his “prediction” is that the UK is currently facing high taxes, high public debt and poor service outcomes, with the NHS struggling despite increased spending and staffing. And there is a “disruption” in politics (which means things are not going as Blair and his paymasters had planned).

Blair attributes the disruption in politics to the failure of traditional management and the need for fundamental change, citing Donald Trump’s victory and the rise of maverick leaders as examples. (“Maverick” could mean these leaders are not entirely under the control of the Globalist controllers.)

He notes that the challenges of governing have become harder since his time as Prime Minister (1997-2007), when the UK experienced strong growth, investment in public services and rising productivity and real wages.

Blair highlights the 21st-century Technological Revolution as a game-changer, transforming the private sector and offering opportunities for the public sector to improve services and efficiency. (This is a reference to the public-private partnership model, see HERE and HERE, that the World Economic Forum and the United Nations are implementing globally).

He cites the success of technology giants and the widespread use of digital services such as Amazon, Google Maps and mobile banking, which rely on data to personalise services. Blair acknowledges the risks associated with technology, including artificial intelligence, but emphasises the need to reduce risks while embracing opportunities. (Blair doesn’t know anything about technology as he admitted at India’s flagship conference on geopolitics and geo-strategy, Raisina Dialogue, in March 2023, read more HERE.)

Blair imagines a future where digital IDs and wallets can simplify transactions, access to health information and identity verification, citing examples of countries such as Singapore, India and Estonia that are already implementing similar systems.

He concludes that technology can help address the challenges of governing but it requires a willingness to adapt and innovate. (We are not willing to “adapt” to a plan that has been decades in the making to remove all our rights and freedoms, our private property, and in many cases our lives, and hand it all to a few unelected bureaucrats at the United Nations and the World Economic Forum. See our previous articles on the depopulation agenda HERE.)

Addressing Immigration Challenges with Digital ID

The UK is facing a significant challenge with immigration, particularly with individuals staying in the country without permission, estimated to be between 600,000 to 750,000 people, the highest number in any European country.

Implementing a digital ID system, accessible through a single digital application (“app”), could help track those without permission, reduce benefits and online fraud, and provide the government with accurate data for informed policy decisions.

The use of digital ID is becoming increasingly common globally, with around three-quarters of the 45 governments Tony Blair works with embracing some form of digital ID, and the President of the World Bank, Ajay Banga, considering it a top priority. (The World Bank is one of the organisations that make up the UN One World Government system. See the image below for an indication of how the UN fits into the Global Public-Private Partnership (“GPPP”).)

The image above was adapted from the ‘Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P)’. Credit to Iain Davis

**The Transformative Potential of the Technological Revolution**

The technological revolution has the potential to bring about significant changes in various sectors, including healthcare, crime prevention and education, with advancements in areas such as facial recognition, data and DNA. (Note: the intention is not to stop with biometrics such as facial recognition, they plan to track and monitor us using our DNA.)

“If we used the potential of facial recognition, data and DNA, we would cut crime rates by not small but game-changing margins,” he said. (They always use an excuse they feel the population will rally around – such as war, disease, climate change, child safety, immigration or crime – to pass the laws and/or implement their schemes but the laws are soon extended to the entire population not just criminals, for example. And if the schemes were sold as temporary to a “common threat,” an enemy to unite us, they are never entirely rescinded when the “threat” no longer exists.)

The adoption of a digital ID system would require the right digital infrastructure, and while concerns over privacy and security are inevitable, there are available safeguards and oversight measures to address these issues. (Don’t for a minute believe Blair who has a track record of lying.)

Blair claimed a properly implemented Digital ID system would give individuals more control over their data, allowing them to see who can access it and why. (Don’t for a minute believe Blair who has a track record of lying.)

The UK has the capability to be a leader in this technological revolution, with world-class universities and a strong presence in AI, ranking third globally after the US and China, he said. The mission should be to harness this technological revolution to change Britain and the way government functions, with the potential to achieve lower taxes, reduced spending and improved outcomes. (Improved outcomes? For whom?)

The current system is not working, he said, and this is an opportunity for once-in-a-generation disruption, with digital ID being a good starting point. (Blair is being blatant about using the concept ‘Problem-Reaction-Solution’. Rather than Blair’s solution, our solution is that this is a once-in-a-generation opportunity for us to expose and disrupt Blair and his paymasters’ plans sufficiently that they cannot be implemented and so their house of cards crumbles.)

*Featured image taken from here, The iPaper, 22 February 2023*

SOURCE

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.