GRAHAM WOOD
The decision by the three political activist judges to grant a priority of “rights” to illegal immigrants over those of the British people is a ‘game-changer’ and must bring to a head the ongoing resistance to a government which has abandoned all pretence to the ‘rule of law’, which is operating a clear tyranny and moving towards more totalitarianism reminiscent of communist regimes of the Russian Soviet eras, and the iron rule of the Stasi of E. Germany.
At issue is not merely that of illegal immigrants, but much deeper, namely the ancient rights of the British people to believe and hold to their historic freedoms of free speech, of assembly, of religion and conscience, that is our Common Law rights, as against State organised suppression backed unconstitutionally by the sheer force of militarised and politicised “police” forces under this Starmer government. In a word, democracy itself is at stake in Britain and I do not believe that flag waving and even large street protests, welcome evidence of rising patriotism, are enough to reverse this reality.
What is to be done to restore these, and equally important, what is to be done to protect the vulnerable in our society? How do we begin to prevent women and children in our towns and villages being deliberately subjected to the alien attentions and threats from third world cultures of sexual predators via mass immigration in such unprecedented numbers?
The situation whereby our streets are not safe for these female members of thousands of families is intolerable, where the government reveals its callous disregard for their welfare and safety. Thus it is reported that the East Belfast Nightwatch Division have taken to patrol the streets to keep women safe and watch for illegals who wish their women and children harm. Will other similar vigilante protective groups need to appear in our towns and villages to do the job for which we pay our police forces?
The government’s abandonment of its first duty to protect its citizens is a threat to our existence as a cohesive British nation with over a millennium of our own once held Christian beliefs, laws and culture.
It has been said that the essence of English liberty is the assertion of the people’s rights against their rulers. This is seen clearly in our attitude towards taxation. The government relies on taxpayers’ money and as such, taxpayers must be represented and heard. Taxpayers have to be able to influence and question the government. Protection of private property, individual freedom and safety under the rule of law can be traced back to the foundation of liberty in England.
Perhaps the time has come to re-assert the one-time battle cry of early American settlers against the British tyranny of their day which was instrumental in the eventual emergence of the greatest Constitution for freedom ever known, that of the USA’s Constitution settlement. An essential element of that was the recognition of the test of representative democracy found in the short assertion: ‘No taxation without representation’.
Is it now time to transform that same principle into political action here in the UK? Perhaps this is the only route left for us to regain what a succession of governments have stolen from us over the past years of ‘Conservative’ and Labour governments?
Consider the many current examples where the British public have no real representation from those who constitutionally are obliged to give them. Firstly, our own King. KCIII has abandoned his solemn Coronation Oath to exclusively defend the rights and liberties of the British people under the Constitution. He represents the WEF more than the people.
Then, we have no real representation in our own parliament under the common policies of what we rightly call the Uniparty, so that there is no real H.M’s Opposition in the House of Commons in what should be a democratic process. Remember, Adolf Hitler’s notorious Enabling Act of 1933 giving the Nazis complete totalitarian control was passed through the German parliament of the time.
It can be argued that similar repressive legislation passed over many years, such as our legal conformity to the ECHR, together with the new so called ‘On line Safety Act’ deprive the UK’s electorate both of freedom of action over devastating illegal and legal immigration, but worse, the right to exercise free speech through the MSM and increasingly through the internet itself through government sponsored censorship.’
Is it only a matter of time before sites such as this and a few other dwindling UK web sites promoting freedom are shut down?
Tell me that a political coup d’etat has not already taken place through alien freedom suppressing legislation which is entirely unrepresentative of the collective mind and will of the electorate.
As we now know, it has just been demonstrated once again that neither do we possess any real representation in law through our courts system with two clear standards of court judgements – one which favours those who conform to the current political stance of the government’s narrative, against those who still believe and require absolute equality before the law. As we know corrupt judges deliver politically correct decisions which are patently unfair, and unjust so that the present judicial system is held in complete contempt as Tom’s earlier article has already shown.
If we thought that our current national police forces, with their historic rules of policing being ‘without fear or favour’, would still offer safe havens for legal protections that should be ours, then again we would be completely mistaken. These have become unashamedly politicised and are the tools of violent oppression against legitimate dissent so that in effect we have aggressive armed forces used habitually against the people, but which represent the State, not the people – and against the clear article of the Bill of Rights which forbids a standing army (riot police thugs in uniform).
So too we have lost entirely any form of representation through the once well-established organs of the press and media which once broadly reflected the views and concerns of British people, i.e. the mainstream media, whether though the biased national broadcaster, the BBC, or Sky, or the daily broadsheets with widespread censorship by government now commonplace and established with editors captured by the political left to selectively publish only the official narratives.
What about the multiplied scores of unelected and unaccountable ‘quangos’ which exercise hidden policy control over many areas of our national life? The electorate never voted for these, and they remain entirely free from any representative democratic control. What government past or present has ever shown enough backbone to scrap all of them?
Time fails to speak of many other now unrepresentative bodies and organisations such as the Church of England, the universities and college leaderships, much of corporate business interests, and a host of others lesser bodies which display the same craven submission to the all-pervasive cultural Marxist ideology. Suffice to say that virtually every major institution in the UK today has conceded loss of their liberty and independence of thought and action to this monochrome, barren orthodoxy.
Although many small political parties exist and new ones are beginning to appear and get established such as Advance UK and Reform, these are still in embryo and time is not on their side in order to begin the urgent
need for radical and united opposition to the mounting examples of expressions of tyranny which appear on a daily basis.
But, some may argue, we have representation through the ballot box at every General Election. In answer: this is a mirage as we know that a deeply unpopular and unrepresentative Uniparty is returned every time. In the current situation Labour’s huge majority means the imposition of a new Communism without let or hindrance for a further four years, by which time Britain will be unrecognisable as anything approaching a democracy.
We pay lip service to the idea that government is by consent of the people and what we cynically call a ‘representative democracy’. But we know that many of the current policies have never been subject to public approval or given that needed consent. A leading example is that of the incredibly foolish and counter-productive policy of the Net Zero obsession that grips our political leaders, resulting from the madness of climate alarmism. This alone promises only economic collapse, as it’s obvious and inevitable result, apart from massive rising energy costs to be borne by those least able to bear them. We never gave our consent to that.
To summarise. It appears that we, the British people, are now on our own against a hostile political establishment of globalists, in reality a puppet government, in hoc to external non-elected bodies such as the WEF, the EU, UN & etc, through which it pursues its hidden agenda for untrammelled power without the inconvenience of a bothersome electorate.
Perhaps now is the time for the phoenix of the UK Taxpayer’s Alliance to arise from the ashes and to spread her wings of freedom once again to represent the people who pay ever increasing taxes to support an overtly oppressive government. Such are the urgent needs of the hour for the Alliance to raise the banner once again – ‘No taxation without representation’. What exact form that will take is open for discussion and debate, but I suggest the time for concerted united action has arrived to send a strong message to the government that the limit has been reached and enough is indeed enough. Action is now the priority requirement.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply