Mandelson Is on the RAINS List

RHODA WILSON

As the scandal surrounding former UK ambassador to the United States Lord Peter Mandelson’s association with Jeffrey Epstein is blowing up in Keir Starmer’s face, a 2018 list of people involved in satanic ritual abuse resurfaces.  Mandelson’s name is on the List.

Dr. Joan Coleman was a psychiatrist and a prominent figure in the field of ritual abuse and trauma, known for founding the Ritual Abuse Information Network & Support (“RAINS”) in 1989.  She passed away in 2018, but the RAINS List, which she compiled in the early 2000s, remains.

The RAINS List, a compilation of names and details, was created based on testimonies from survivors of alleged satanist ritual abuse (“SRA”), with each of the more than 100 people on the list reportedly named by at least two independent witnesses.

Read more: Dr. Joan Coleman and the R.A.I.N.S List, The Forgotten Boys, 15 September 2023

One of the critical roles of the RAINS List is raising awareness about the existence of ritual abuse and the availability of support resources.  But there are times when the List becomes critical to ensure an investigation and, if appropriate, justice is done.  The Mandelson scandal has provided an opportunity for such a time.

Before Peter Mandelson was appointed as the UK Ambassador to the United States, it was pointed out that he was on the RAINS List.

In 2018, British journalist, social commentator and filmmaker Sonia Poulton produced a documentary, ‘Paedophiles in Parliament, which explored the alleged cover-up of child abuse by senior public figures within the British establishment.  The documentary examines cases involving prominent people, including Jimmy Savile and Sir Edward Heath, and discusses the role of organisations like the Paedophile Information Exchange.  Poulton also discussed the RAINS List.


Paedophiles In Parliament (Sonia Poulton), 2018, (96 mins)

If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it on Odysee HERE and Rumble HERE.

You can find a copy of the RAINS List updated for hyperlinks by WildCat at spidercatweb.blog on 28 June 2018 HERE.  As the tweet above shows, the details given on the list for Mandelson read:

The image below is a compilation of quotes from various sources.  The first two paragraphs are taken from a letter written by Dr. Coleman in response to an article written by Leslie Wilson and published in the London Review of Books in 1995.  There is no mention of the source for the third paragraph beginning “Peter Mandelson ordered …” and we were unable to verify that this is a quote from Dr. Coleman.

Lord Mandelson was appointed as the UK’s Ambassador to the United States of America in December 2024, following confirmation by Prime Minister Keir Starmer and approval by His Majesty the King.  Mandelson officially assumed the role on 10 February 2025.

With the sort of accusation of SRA floating about, you would have thought Starmer would have at least made sure Mandelson was not involved in any scandals before appointing him as ambassador to the United States.

Perhaps the evidence about Mandelson’s involvement in Kevin’s torture and murder wasn’t sufficient for Starmer to question his judgment. But there are other dubious things about Mandelson that Starmer should have taken notice of.

The Independent reported that MI6 failed to clear Mandelson for the job as ambassador to the United States largely because of concerns over his business links to China – but Starmer pushed through his appointment anyway.

Related: MI6 failed to clear Peter Mandelson for the role as ambassador to the United States

And then there’s Mandelson’s association with notorious paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

As ITV recently asked, “Why in December did [Starmer] appoint Lord Mandelson to be US ambassador even though Mandelson admitted during the vetting process that he continued to be a friend and supporter ‘for some years’ of Jeffrey Epstein after the billionaire was prosecuted and jailed for criminal paedophile offences?”

Yes, quite.  And let’s not forget that King Charles also approved Mandelson’s appointment.  What has Charles III’s response been? He has complained that the furore about the Mandelson scandal is a “distraction.”

“Ahead of the US President’s arrival on Tuesday, a diplomatic source said: ‘The Palace has been grumbling about how unhelpful it all is. Charles regards it as an unwelcome distraction’,” the Daily Mail said.

Charles might want to take some public relations advice on how to get himself out of this mess; perhaps his brother Andrew could assist?

Further reading:

Featured image: Peter Mandelson and Keir Starmer. Taken from ‘Labour MP says PM not up to the job, as Mandelson backlash grows’, BBC, 12 September 2025

Expose News: Mandelson hits headlines: He's on the RAINS List! Get the latest scoop on this intriguing twist. Stay tuned for more juicy details!

This article (Mandelson is on the RAINS List) was created and published by The Expose and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Rhoda Wilson

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*