London deserves better than the RMT’s four-day fantasy
TALI FRASER
Last night I struggled to get home from Parliament’s press gallery because of yet another Tube strike. All the rented bikes had vanished as office workers hunted for any way back from the city. Cabs were nudging £50. Queues stretched round corners just to squeeze onto an already jammed bus.
Londoners face this until Friday morning, when the RMT union finally unlocks the capital’s arteries. By then hundreds of thousands of working days will have been lost and the cost to the economy will top £200 million. And for what? Not safety, not reform, not efficiency. The RMT wants a four-day week on full pay, plus a staff travel perk so generous it would make MPs’ allowances blush.
No transport system in the world runs on a 32-hour week – not Paris, not Tokyo, not Barcelona – but that is what the RMT would like: 32 hours and no loss of pay. This is already with drivers earning salaries between £65,000 and £75,000 a year, plus a pension so generous that most of the private sector has stopped providing anything like it.
That’s not all. A key demand buried in the RMT’s strike is an extension of priv fares, which offer 75 per cent discounts on national rail services. The union wants these privileges extended to every Tube employee.
Is this really about safety? Or is it about perks?
The answer feels obvious. This year, TfL offered another 3.4 per cent pay rise. Tube drivers enjoy a defined-benefit pension that allows retirement on three-quarters of final salary. And yet, after a taxpayer bailout of £3.6 billion in 2020, they are again holding the city to ransom.
The irony is that every strike is likely to hasten the things the RMT fear most: automation or a no strike agreement. Paris, Barcelona, Tokyo, Dubai – all have embraced driverless operations. It is not impossible for London to do the same, but TfL protests that it would cost billions (though asking them is like asking a Turkey to vote for Christmas). This set of strikes alone is costing £230m, and millions more is bled from London’s economy every time the RMT calls a stoppage.
The RMT’s line is almost always the same: automation is unsafe. But safety on the Tube is hardly guaranteed by drivers. Consider the case of Sarah de Lagarde, the woman run over by two separate Northern line trains in 2022, after both drivers failed to see her lying on the tracks – she managed to survive but is now a double amputee. There are video clips of drivers on other lines watching television shows on their phone as they get on with the clearly arduous job.
Tories have long advocated for driverless trains and full-automation. Boris Johnson made the case for them while campaigning for his second term as London Mayor back in 2012. As Prime Minister ten years later he pledged the tube would be fully automated by 2022 (if only). Then transport secretary Grant Shapps tied driverless trains as a condition to TfL’s £200m bailout, telling TfL it would have to look into its feasibility. Sadiq Khan, City Hall’s patron saint of the RMT, has never advocated the idea.
Back in 2016 he said: “I’ll make sure that I’m talking to everyone who runs public transport to make sure there are zero days of strikes. 16 was too many and 35 is a disgrace.”
Khan doesn’t have to worry about Boris’s record of 35 because he has well exceeded that with City Hall Conservatives counting 149 strikes under his watch.
And, for the record, Khan now argues: “I did not make a promise of zero strikes” (but rather a promise to roll up his sleeves to try to make this happen). Not very successfully, eh.
Since 2023, TfL has had the power to enforce a minimum service level of 40 per cent during strikes – similar to France, Spain and Switzerland. Yet the Labour Government plans to repeal it all together as part of the Employment Rights Bill, and in the process had advised public bodies not to use these powers in the meantime. So Londoners, who like me found it took them hours to get home because of the strikes, should know this: you, the customer, who are actually generating economic growth, are being penalised – and with what is effectively political endorsement.
As Samuel Hughes at Works in Progress notes, there is an obvious contrast with the Overground and Elizabeth line; run not by TfL, but by concessionaires. Strikes are rare and not coordinated with the Underground.
There seem to be two routes forward. One is privatisation: a structured private Tube, subject to modern safety regulation, which would see the economic sense in automating as quickly as possible. The other is political will: a mayor prepared to face down the unions, enforce minimum service, and push through reform. Neither looks likely under Sadiq Khan.
Until then, Londoners will go on paying for a city strangled by its own transport network. One run for perks not passengers.
This article (London deserves better than the RMT’s four-day fantasy) was created and published by Conservative Home and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Tali Fraser
See Related Article Below
Tube Strikes Unleash “Pure Carnage” on London as Drivers on £72K a Year Demand More Money, a Four-Day Week and 75% Off All Rail Travel
London is facing “pure carnage” today as striking Tube drivers on £72,000 a year bring the capital to a standstill demanding more money, a four-day week and 75% discounts on train journeys nationwide. The Mail has more.
Members of the Rail, Maritime and Transport (RMT) union today began their five-day strike, leaving commuters facing days of travel mayhem with little or no service on all of the Tube as different parts of the union walk out on different days.
Hard-pressed Brits faced scenes of chaos this morning as the London Underground network was paralysed, bus drivers turned away passengers and motorists and cyclists faced crippling lane closures.
The Elizabeth Line and the Overground – the only two lines running as normal – have been completely overwhelmed, with queues forming out of the station exits.
Images throughout London this morning show closed off entrances to stations and mammoth queues at bus stops as millions of British workers look to fight tooth and nail to make their way into the city.
The strike has been exacerbated by lane closures, with commuters stuck in gridlocks through parts of central London including on roads around Kings Cross St Pancras – ironically where drivers are on the picket line.
Many looking for alternative ways to work have been unable to order Ubers – or face surged pricing – while hire bikes have been snapped up in seconds.
As hard-working Londoners were unable to get across the capital, Labour’s Liverpool Riverside MP Kim Johnson said she stood in “solidarity” with the RMT, adding: “No worker should be put at risk by fatigue and extreme shift rotations – power in a union, always!”
Striking Tube workers are demanding a boost to their pay packets despite already being on £72,000 per year – as well as a reduction from a 35 hour working week to a four-day, 32-hour system.
They are also asking for a 75% discount on all rail travel, despite already receiving benefits which entitle their loved ones to free travel across the entire London public transport system.
It is believed any moves to meet the RMT’s demands would cost around £200million – and that is before the huge discount on rail travel is even considered.
TfL, which has since tabled a 3.4% pay rise offer to the union’s members, said reducing working hours would be “simply unaffordable” – adding today that it was “bitterly disappointed” with the RMT’s decision.
Worth reading in full.
Featured image: Shutterstock
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply