Starmer’s Chief of Staff and £700k ‘admin error’
Bombshell leaked email shows top Labour lawyer advised PM’s aide Morgan McSweeney to describe £700,000 in ‘hidden’ donations as a ‘mistake’
A top Labour lawyer advised Keir Starmer‘s chief of staff to describe £740,000 in ‘hidden’ donations as an ‘admin error’, a leaked email reveals.
The crisis engulfing Morgan McSweeney deepened after the bombshell email shed new light on a notorious episode in which his think-tank was fined in 2021 for 20 breaches of electoral law involving undeclared donations.
The email from the lawyer advised Mr McSweeney to drop his unsubstantiated claim that he had been told donations totalling £739,492 to Labour Together did not have to be declared. It warned him that unless he could back up the claim with evidence, it risked antagonising the Electoral Commission, which was investigating the scandal.
It told him instead to try to pass the episode off as a simple ‘admin error’.
The email, seen by the Daily Mail, was published in full on Tuesday night by the Conservatives, who stepped up calls for the police to investigate the affair.
Tory Party chairman Kevin Hollinrake said: ‘The evidence is clear – Morgan McSweeney has been caught red-handed hiding hundreds of thousands of pounds which helped install Keir Starmer as Labour leader.
‘This latest scandal at the very heart of government is incredibly serious – and potentially criminal – yet Keir Starmer has expressed his full confidence in his chief of staff, once again demonstrating his poor judgment and raising serious questions about his integrity and honesty.
‘Nothing-to-see-here Keir may think he can ride this one out as he tried to over the Mandelson-Epstein scandal, or perhaps he is too weak to fire a chief of staff who tells him what to think…
Daily Mail: continue reading
See Related Article Below
Labour plunged into scandal as leaked legal advice suggests £739,000 donation cover-up
.
CP
Labour is facing another serious integrity crisis after the Conservatives released leaked legal correspondence which they claim raises serious questions about almost three quarters of a million pounds in undeclared donations linked to Keir Starmer’s rise to the leadership.
The email, sent on 3 February 2021 by solicitor Gerald Shamash to Morgan McSweeney, then a director of Labour Together, suggests the organisation failed to declare £739,492 to the Electoral Commission. According to the Conservatives, those funds bankrolled the campaign that propelled Starmer into the Labour leadership, yet were kept out of public view.
In the leaked emails, Shamash admitted: “The amounts of the late reported donations is £739,492 and there are in my view, no easy way to explain how LT finds itself in this situation.” His advice was that Labour Together should seek a quiet deal with the regulator to “minimise publicity” and, if pressed, present the matter as “admin error.”
The leaked correspondence makes clear that McSweeney himself had spoken to the Electoral Commission in early 2018 and walked away with the impression that Labour Together no longer needed to report donations. Shamash conceded this was flatly wrong: “The legislation is clear that notwithstanding LT should have reported.” In other words, Labour failed to meet its legal obligations, and Starmer’s campaign benefited.
The email also raises highly uncomfortable questions:
- Why did McSweeney report a £12,500 donation from businessman Sir Trevor Chinn in August 2018, while hundreds of thousands of pounds in other donations went undeclared?
- Why did Labour Together never appoint a legally required “responsible person” to oversee reporting, despite being told to do so since 2015?
- Why were senior Labour MPs including Steve Reed and Shabana Mahmood aware of donor transparency issues as early as 2018–2019, yet failed to act?
Conservative Party chairman Kevin Hollinrake said the scandal showed Starmer’s government had misled both regulators and the public. “It shows how authorities may have been misled over hundreds of thousands of pounds of donations used to install Starmer as Labour leader. We believe there is a strong public interest in revealing the full truth to the public about possible criminal wrongdoing. The Prime Minister was elected on a pledge to restore honesty and integrity in politics, but time and again he has deceived the public and put his party before our national interest,” he said.
Hollinrake accused Starmer of sweeping wrongdoing under the rug: “We will not let the Prime Minister cover this up like he did with the Mandelson-Epstein files. ‘Nothing-to-see-here’ Keir may be too weak to fire a Chief of Staff who tells him what to think, but Conservatives believe the public deserves the truth.”
A former Conservative MP told the Post: “Far from cleaning up politics, the leaked email shows Labour Together actively sought ways to dodge transparency rules, conceal the scale of its donations, and craft a press strategy to limit exposure.
“At the heart of the scandal is the undeniable fact that Starmer’s leadership campaign was sustained by vast undeclared sums. His chief of staff, who was then charged with running Downing Street, was directly involved in conversations with the Electoral Commission and central to decisions not to disclose funds. According to the correspondance, senior Labour figures knew what was happening, and rather than come clean, chose to keep the public in the dark.”
The Conservatives have published the correspondence in full, urging people to “read it for yourself.” The leaked email makes clear this was no accident, but a deliberate failure to declare nearly three quarters of a million pounds, money that helped deliver Keir Starmer the leadership of the Labour Party.
The MP continued: “This is not just a technical breach of reporting rules. It goes to the core of whether the Prime Minister can be trusted. He promised integrity. Instead, his inner circle is now implicated in one of the most serious political cover-ups in recent memory.”
Labour has yet to provide a convincing explanation. The silence from Starmer’s office only fuels the sense of a party desperate to hide the truth.
Find out more at: https://www.whatlaboursaid.com/the-mcsweeney-files
This article (Labour plunged into scandal as leaked legal advice suggests £739,000 donation cover-up) was created and published by Conservative Post and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author CP
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply