Labour’s Housing Frenzy: A Recipe for Mould, Misery, and Another Grenfell?

.
Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner have been banging the drum for their shiny new plan to build 1.5 million homes by the end of Labour’s first term. It’s a bold promise, meant to tackle England’s housing crisis, where families face 100-year waits for social housing and private renters are fleeced for crumbling flats. But as the Housing Ombudsman’s latest report lays bare, the sector is already a cesspit of mould, leaks, and landlord neglect. With complaints about substandard living conditions soaring by 474% since 2019/20, you’d think Labour would tread carefully. Instead, their breakneck building blitz risks pouring fuel on a fire that’s already burning tenants alive, figuratively, and literally.

A Crisis Boiling Over

The Ombudsman’s report, dropped this week, is a gut-punch. Social housing tenants are drowning in “simmering anger” over damp, mouldy homes and repairs that never happen. In 2023/24, landlords spent £9bn on maintenance, yet 72% of complaints stemmed from shoddy practice. Tenants like Kerianne Wilson, living in the shadow of Grenfell Tower, are battling collapsed ceilings and black mould while landlords treat them like “militant troublemakers.” The Ombudsman, Richard Blakeway, warns of a “fracturing of trust” and a sector in “managed decline.” Sound familiar? It’s the same systemic rot that led to Grenfell and the tragic death of toddler Awaab Ishak, killed by mould in a Rochdale flat.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/may/29/housing-ombudsman-for-england-warns-of-simmering-anger-over-living-conditions

Now, Labour wants to build 1.5 million homes at warp speed. Great, right? Not so fast. The Guardian reports that 4.4 million social homes exist, with 380,000 deemed “non-decent.” That’s 380,000 ticking time bombs of health hazards and safety failures. Rushing to hit a headline-grabbing target without fixing the broken system is like building a house on quicksand. And don’t forget the 88,000 households choking on damp and mould, or the 4.5 million people, per the Centre for Ageing Better, stuck in homes that make them sick. Labour’s plan risks adding more shoddily built estates to the pile, with tenants left to pick up the pieces.

A Sneaky Two-Tier Trick?

Here’s where it gets murky. Starmer and Rayner talk a good game about “green” council housing and “golden rules” for affordable homes. But whispers on X and policy fine print suggest a darker play: lean on Tory-era deregulatory tools like Freeports and Special Economic Zones (SEZs) to fast-track construction. These zones, designed to lure corporate cash, come with relaxed planning rules and oversight so flimsy it’s practically non-existent. The result? Private developers could churn out substandard homes while Labour focuses on a handful of shiny, well-regulated council properties to parade for the cameras.

This smells like a two-tier system. Council homes might get the Awaab’s Law treatment—strict timelines for fixing hazards like mould, as mandated by the Social Housing (Regulation) Act 2023. But private sector builds? Don’t hold your breath. With only 2.5% of private rentals affordable on housing benefit, per the Guardian, and developers already notorious for cutting corners (think damp walls and dodgy wiring), loosening regulations is a disaster waiting to happen. Grenfell exposed how cost-cutting and landlord arrogance turn homes into death traps. Yet Labour’s plan risks handing developers a blank cheque while tenants foot the bill with their health—and lives.

.
A Policy Mess with Disasters Looming

Let’s call it what it is: a desperate policy mess. Labour’s inherited a housing sector on its knees—underfunded, overstretched, and riddled with a “postcode lottery” of standards. The National Housing Federation is begging for more cash, with social landlords squeezed by rising costs and 7.7% rent hikes planned for April 2025. But instead of plugging the funding gap, Labour’s betting on private developers and deregulated zones to hit their 1.5 million target. It’s a recipe for more Kerianne Wilsons, more Awaab Ishaks, and maybe another Grenfell. The Ombudsman’s £3.4m in compensation orders last year is a drop in the bucket compared to the systemic change needed.

And don’t expect tenants to stay quiet. The Social Housing Action Campaign and others are amplifying voices fed up with being ignored. Blakeway’s warning of “social disquiet” isn’t just hot air, it’s a signal that people are done with landlords who treat them like pests. Labour could enforce Awaab’s Law and beef up inspections, but that requires political spine and cash they haven’t promised. Planning reforms might help, but as the Guardian notes, “grey areas” in execution could very well let developers off the hook. Meanwhile, posts on X are already slamming new builds for leaks and mould. History’s screaming: rushed construction equals long-term misery

.
Time to Demand Better

Labour’s housing frenzy could be a chance to fix a broken system—or a fast track to more tragedies. Tenants deserve homes that don’t make them sick, don’t collapse, and don’t burn. Starmer and Rayner need to ditch the corporate-friendly SEZ nonsense and commit to funding, oversight, and tenant power. No more photo-ops with hard hats while private developers build slums. No more two-tier systems where council homes get gold stars and private renters get mould. The “simmering anger” Blakeway warns of isn’t just frustration—it’s a demand for justice. Ignore it, and Labour’s housing dream will turn into a nightmare.

---

This article (Labour’s Housing Frenzy: A Recipe for Mould, Misery, and Another Grenfell?) was created and published by EuropeanPowell and is republished here under “Fair Use”