CP
Welcome to Labour’s Britain, where police officers are now tasked not with chasing burglars, rapists or drug gangs, but with scrolling through your social media feed.
That’s right. While shoplifters waltz out of Tesco with armfuls of stolen goods and thugs roam our streets unchecked, Her Majesty’s finest are being reassigned, not to crack down on criminals, but to police opinions.
You, dear reader, might want to sit down for this one. The Home Office is building a shiny new “National Internet Intelligence Investigations Team” (doesn’t that sound delightfully dystopian?) to “monitor social media intelligence” and flag any signs of “civil unrest.” Not actual unrest, mind you… not mobsters torching shops or gangs fighting in broad daylight. No, we’re talking about comments. Dissent. Concerns. Speech.
Specifically, speech about illegal immigration, the kind you see daily: dinghies packed like sardine cans bobbing across the Channel, fraudulent visas handed out like party invites, and folks sneaking in under tarpaulins or through the back of refrigerated vans. Say something about it online, something unapproved by the elite echo chamber, and you might just find yourself on Labour’s Naughty List. Say too much, and it’s a jail cell for you.
This is not policing. This is political suppression wrapped in a uniform.
Let’s set the record straight: The vast majority of Brits are NOT anti-migrant. Millions have come here legally, played by the rules, worked hard, integrated, and helped make this country stronger. But walk down any high street, and you’ll hear the same truth: people are fed up with illegal immigration. Illegal… that’s the word Labour and their media acolytes desperately want to erase from the national vocabulary.
No amount of taxpayer-funded Thought Police, no Orwellian social media units, will change that reality. Because people aren’t stupid. They see what’s happening. They know what’s being covered up.
Ask yourself this: What would you think if a plane landed at Heathrow and a group of young men sprinted past border control, bypassing security, ignoring all checks and then were sent to your village? You’d be alarmed. You’d demand answers. You’d wonder: Who are they? Where have they come from? Are we safe?
That’s exactly how it feels watching boat after boat arrive unchecked on our shores, except now, if you dare to say it out loud, you risk being investigated. Silenced. Punished.
Because Labour aren’t interested in solving the migration crisis. They voted against stopping the boats dozens of times. They obstructed every attempt to fix our borders while in opposition. They scrapped the Conservative’s Rwanda deterrent just as it was ready to go on Day 1. Now, in government, their solution isn’t to close the floodgates, but to slap duct tape over the mouths of anyone who notices the water rising.
This “elite unit” (a phrase that now inspires dread, not reassurance) isn’t about preventing violence. It’s about pre-emptively suppressing thought. They don’t fear riots… they fear resistance. They don’t want order… they want control. Because if the public ever fully voiced their fury, if the silence broke, the whole rotten edifice might collapse.
Worse still, this reeks of state collusion with far-left pro-migration groups. Stir up some managed chaos, blame it on “hate,” roll out new restrictions, and… abracadabra!… another civil liberty gone. It’s the same authoritarian playbook the world saw during lockdowns: create fear, demand compliance, and punish those who question the narrative.
This is China in a trench coat. East Germany with a TikTok account. Call it what you will, it’s not democracy.
Labour, in their Marxist zeal, have forgotten who they serve. Robbers, muggers, fraudsters… they get a pass. But express anger at the daily illegal crossings or share footage of an asylum hotel protest? Now that’s a threat.
Already, footage is being scrubbed from platforms under the guise of “online safety.” Already, peaceful protesters are being watched. Already, people like you and I are being labeled “risks” for daring to ask why the border has become a suggestion rather than a law.
They’ve conflated legal and illegal immigration so no one can question either without being branded a bigot. Well I’m not buying it. And I won’t stop saying illegal just because the new Ministry of Truth finds it unfashionable. It is the truth. Most of those arriving on our shores have come from France… a SAFE country.
Labour wants you scared. They want you confused. They want you obedient. But Britain doesn’t belong to the technocrats in Whitehall or the censorship squads in Westminster. It belongs to its people… and it’s high time we reminded them of that. So no, I won’t shut up.
I won’t be intimidated by surveillance squads, online snitches, or Orwellian “intelligence teams.” And if that puts me on a list, so be it. Because the real danger isn’t what I’m saying. It’s what they’re doing.
The time to speak up is now – before the state silences us all. Stand by your Conservative and Reform MPs who are fighting to protect your freedoms.
This article (Labour’s Great Betrayal: Borders Wide Open, Mouths Clamped Shut) was created and published by Conservative Post and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author CP
See Related Article Below
THE GLOVES ARE NOW OFF ON IMMIGRATION
PAUL SUTTON
There comes a time when the British finally wake up. And when they do, it doesn’t work to deny what they’ve woken up to.
For my whole life, immigration has been the key cultural and social issue in Britain, especially England. And it’s now the vital decider for how – and if – this country will survive, as grimly shown in the government’s refusal to do anything about the illegal crossings, other than fight for the human rights and luxuries of those arriving. Their numbers total about 174,000, since 2018.
Yet discussion on immigration has always been shame-faced, muted, dishonest, slandered and heavily censored, until now. So what’s changed?
For one thing, the bullshit ‘argument’ that economic logic necessitates vast immigration has vanished. It’s just too obvious that we’ve been importing cheap labour, to its advantage (and for the elite’s) while inflicting suffering and neglect on our poorest and wrecking social cohesion. British national policy (across the board) has been to replace our working class with cheaper alternatives – and demonise the former.
Because for anyone with a moral compass, the issue has always been cultural and social. Thank goodness that’s now centre stage. Small wonder, when 4% of this country’s population arrived here in the last two years! Since 1997, over 17 million immigrants have arrived, with net immigration alone of about 10 million.
Above all, the social effects have so clearly been appalling, especially in our cities and towns. Two-tier attacks on freedom of speech – and imprisonment – are the nasty solution, for our government – of course with impunity for any who commit violent acts, if they’re on the left.
It’s difficult to see what they would do differently, if their policy was motivated by hatred of England and its people. Small wonder many believe this is the case – and that sectarian conflict has already started. What can one expect, given the terrible wave of sexual crimes – especially against children – that uncontrolled immigration has caused? The UK is now the rape capital of Europe, replacing Sweden.
Many ‘progressives’ will find all that ‘appalling’ and ‘offensive’. But most people are naturally and intensely protective of their children and their turf. The fantasies of internationalism and globalism mean nothing, in comparison. They naturally don’t want unvetted young blokes moving in – next door, down the road, into their country. Even less do they want this imposed without consultation, which is what’s happened – in Epping and other places. The illegal migrant crisis is emblematic of wider feelings on the whole immigration issue, since at least the 1960s. That’s why it’s so potent – it crystalizes everything.
Fuzzy arguments about diversity are for an ‘elite’, as are (sometimes correct) longer-term points about cultural evolution and intellectual advancement working across borders. Lectures about imperial guilt or welcoming refugees mean even less. There’s the correct impression that open-border advocates sit protected by unscalable walls around large houses and pots of money, secure and eager to assert supposed moral superiority, without suffering hits to their own lives. And everyone knows those arriving have come from a safe country.
So the Overton window has been completely smashed, with just a few fragments of glass left in the frame. For decades, the reality of cultural replacement was a taboo. My mother’s parents were both Greek immigrants, arriving in London in about 1931, which means I can vaguely claim to have a very limited insight, into the issues facing immigrants. But those are so often discussed that I’m completely bored with them, the bullshit about diversity. I care far more about England and its long-suffering people – which of course is about identity, just not the officially celebrated ‘multicultural’ one. Who isn’t fed up with being lectured about the virtues of everyone who isn’t English?
In truth, most middle-class people have never been fair about immigration. They’ve gloatingly dismissed the social and cultural concerns of English working class communities as worthless, irrelevant – if not ‘racist’. As a result, the class hatreds within England seem beyond repair. In any case, this Labour government seems intent on widening them.
Yet they’ve a problem: Keith Starmer. He’s so reviled – and such a reification of all that I write! Incapable of changing or adapting, just doubling down and lashing out wildly.
He’s the poster-boy for all that I castigate, and can’t see it. His Ceaușescu moment was telling a select committee that there’s abundant empty social housing across the country, just waiting for illegal immigrants to move in.
What sweet music for the 1.3 million on local authority housing lists, desperate for a home!
This article (THE GLOVES ARE NOW OFF ON IMMIGRATION) was created and published by Paul Sutton and is republished here under “Fair Use”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply