FRANK HAVILAND
Going Nowhere
As the season of goodwill approaches, it’s traditional to take pity on those less fortunate than ourselves. And there are few sights more pitiable than a Prime Minister reduced to uttering the words “I’m going nowhere”. Keir Starmer is right of course – he’s going nowhere fast, and dragging the country’s there with him – but I doubt it’s the slogan he was looking for. Starmer’s denial of reality could hardly be less convincing, were he to claim the Downing Street gallows currently being erected behind his back were proof of Labour’s ‘strong and stable’ government.
It was however, not always so. Just 18 months ago, Starmer was swept to power on a tide of Tory exhaustion and middle-class yearning for ‘grown-up’ governance. And yet in that short time, the Labour leader now finds himself beset by scandals, sinking polls, and a party that whispers of regicide whenever he is out of the room. As the columnist Peter Hitchens has long forewarned, Britain under this regime may soon become “impossible to live in” – if you can, you should leave now while the boats are still going out as well as coming in.
The Mirage of Competence
To understand the scale of Starmer’s implosion, we must first rewind to the concatenation of events that delivered him, saviour-like, unto us. By 2024, the Tories had overstayed their welcome; the most unpopular government in modern polling history (net approval -76 % under Truss, still -56 % when they finally limped to the ballot box). Despite 14 years of promises on migration, legal immigration was running at record highs while the small boats crisis was totally out of control – over 45,000 arrivals in 2022 alone. Starmer’s predecessor meanwhile, Jeremy Corbyn, was a brand so toxic even Hamas and Hezbollah were allegedly hesitant to call him ‘our friend’. And while Nigel Farage’s latest incarnation, Reform UK, was burgeoning, it was perceived as unprepared for government.
It is unto this undistinguished backdrop that Starmer appeared. He presented himself as Mr Bland – a man so lifeless, rumours are he is asked to stand in at Madame Tussauds whenever his waxwork dummy is taken off for repair. The establishment were suitably convinced by the Ming Vase strategy – a safe pair of hands at the tiller were what was required. The media fawned over him, with some going to the risible lengths of claiming the Starmer’s were ‘sexy’. Granted, Lady Victoria is a bit of alright, but even so Starmer himself would do well to pull at an Swingers’ party for the RNIB.
Nonetheless, the electorate bought the pitch wholesale. Dissenting voices, few as they were, were drowned out. Precious few glimpsed the authoritarian zealot lurking beneath the rubber face: the man who, as Director of Public Prosecutions, failed grooming-gang victims, and now pushes digital ID, mass facial-recognition rollout, and jail for ‘offensive’ speech. The only voice of substance against this was (again) Peter Hitchens, who humorously offered to ‘take the knee’ if the public would vote against a Starmer government. Alas, his pleas fell upon deaf ears. The result? A landslide majority unseen since Tony Blair’s heyday: 411 seats, the Tories reduced to a rump of 121 and a working majority of 174 MPs. It was hailed as the dawn of a new era.
Instead, we got the twilight of Britain: a country where 84 % of the public – a record high – say the nation is more divided than ever.
The Unravelling
Eighteen months in, and the only impressive thing about the Starmer administration is its freefall from grace. It’s true, Starmer has finally discovered what a woman is – although only because the Supreme Court told him – but he comes up woefully short in terms of other Westminster playground gossip. He didn’t seem to know for instance, that Lord Mandelson was Jeffrey Epstein’s best pal; he didn’t know either if Angela Rayner had broken the ministerial code over her tax affairs, nor whether so doing would prove a sackable offence; he was none too sure about the government’s handling of Chinese espionage, allegations of a grooming gang inquiry cover-up, or that Rachel Reeves’ £22Bn ‘black hole’ may have been slightly exaggerated. If it’s true that the ‘grown-ups are back in-charge’, then they’re the same kind we always seem to get: self-serving, corrupt, lying bar stewards.
The opinion polls tell the story. Labour’s ratings have hit an all-time low, with Starmer himself crowned the most unpopular Prime Minister in history – and bear in mind, that’s up against Truss, May and Brown! Labour insiders will know things are grim when the Chancellor has to make u-turns before the Budget, the Prime Minister is forced to deny Number 10 attacks on potential leadership rivals, and those accused of plotting have to pledge their ‘faith’ in the leader.
We’ve Been Here Before
I have long suspected that Starmer would limp on until the May elections (who else would want to take responsibility for the drubbing Labour are on course for?), but now I’m not so sure. Departure date denials rarely bode well for Prime Ministers. Margaret Thatcher once vowed, “I fight on, I fight to win”; she was gone just hours later. Boris Johnson claimed it was his job to “keep going”; he was gone the next day. And even Liz Truss, bless her, proclaimed she was “a fighter not a quitter”; all of which lasted about 24 hours.
Moreover, Rachel Reeves’ Chancellorship is in serious danger now she has been accused of misleading the public over the state of the nation’s finances. Starmer has managed to keep her in situ thus far, but if she goes veteran political journalist Andrew Neil thinks it will be the end for Starmer too; I tend to agree with him. Meanwhile, the latest megapoll suggests that not only are Reform UK on course to win the next general election, but they could win as many as 445 seats – cutting Labour down to just 73, and the Tories facing wipeout with a paltry 7. The bookies currently have a 2026 general election as long as 8/1 – that might just be a good bet for Christmas.
One Saving Grace
The one saving grace for Starmer right now, is that the subs bench is as uninspiring as the front bench. Even if the Parliamentary Labour Party decides to mount a coup against him, who exactly do they offer up in his place? Andy Burnham is not currently an MP; Angela Rayner is damaged goods since her resignation; Wes Streeting may be too divisive, particularly after recent smears from Number 10; Shabana Mahmood’s favourability has been damaged after butching up on asylum seekers; which leaves Ed Miliband, who, despite being the current favourite, was none too popular before the Net Zero mania.
Dead man walking or not Starmer limps on for now, although he does stumble from time to time:
Keir Starmer putting his best foot forward on the world stage 🤦♂️ pic.twitter.com/qSGUcgrQLZ
— Conservatives (@Conservatives) November 21, 2025
AI is pretty advanced after all, but it does occasionally malfunction when attempting to walk and talk at the same time.
Frank Haviland is the Editor of The New Conservative, and the author of Banalysis: The Lie Destroying the West.
If you enjoy my work, please consider buying me a coffee – it would really help to keep me going. Thank you!
This piece was first published in The European Conservative, and is reproduced by kind permission.
This article (Keir Starmer: Dead Man Walking) was created and published by Frank Haviland and is republished here under “Fair Use”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply