PAUL HOMEWOOD
Sounds like the media are finally waking up to Miliband’s lies:
This new analysis is written by Ben James of Axle Energy, who are strong supporters of Net Zero:
From the Mail:
Ed Miliband’s Net Zero drive will add £160 to annual electricity bills by 2030 – despite wholesale energy prices falling over the same period, according to new research.
An analysis of costs that make up household electricity bills found that Britons will be paying £265 more a year by the end of the decade.
This is due to a rise in green levies, also known as policy costs, to help meet Labour’s ambition of decarbonising the UK’s electricity grid by 2030.
The extra charges will more than offset an expected £105 reduction in the cost of wholesale electricity as a result of cheaper renewable power.
It means an overall increase in average electricity bills of £160, or 16 per cent, by 2030.
Full story here.
The penultimate sentence is an outright lie; clearly the Mail reporter has not read the report properly. Wholesale prices won’t fall “because of cheaper renewable power”; they will fall because the price of gas is expected to come down. But more on that later.
This is Ben James’ table:
https://www.electricitybills.uk/2030
His data and assumptions are all linked, and you can hover over each segment.
These are the main points:
- Renewable Obligations will reduce annual bills by £34, as a result of older renewable generators leaving the scheme.
- Wholesale costs will save a further £71, reflecting lower gas prices. This is in line with DESNZ projections for international gas prices.
- Capacity Market, FIT and CfD subsidies will increase bills by £57
- System balancing will add £50
- Grid upgrades, both transmission and distribution will add a further £101
Of course, the £160 increase only tells part of the story. Households consume less than a third of UK electricity. Higher electricity prices for business and government will push up the price we pay for their goods and increase our taxes. One way or another, the public ends up paying the bill!
In total terms, the real cost to households will be more like £500 a year, equivalent to £13 billion a year. This is on top of the £20 billion or so we are already paying.
None of these should come as any surprise at all, because NESO told us the same a year ago:
https://www.neso.energy/publications/clean-power-2030
NESO projected that labour’s Clean Power 2030 plan would push up balancing and grid costs by £25/MWh, around £8 billion a year. That does not even include the cost of upgrading local distribution networks or all of the grid upgrades.
Moreover, the claim that cost of generation would fall by £15/MWh was an outright lie. It was based on the assumption of a massive hike in carbon tax on gas generation, which consequently allowed claims of “cheaper renewables”.
As Ben James calculates, extra renewables will increase generation costs, not reduce them, probably by something in the region of £5 billion a year.
Meanwhile DESNZ is still in denial:
A spokesperson for the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: ‘We don’t accept this analysis, which over-estimates future costs and ignores the benefits of clean energy.
‘Energy bills are still too high, which is why the Government is taking urgent action to support families this winter, including expanding the £150 Warm Home Discount to 2.7 million more households.
‘The only way to bring down energy bills for good is by making Britain a clean energy superpower, which will get us off the rollercoaster of fossil fuel prices and onto clean, homegrown power that we control.’
If anything, Ben James has underestimated future costs, given the rocketing costs of offshore wind power. Moreover, his figures are underpinned by NESO’s – does DESNZ “not accept” them either?
As for the “benefits of green energy”, there are none!
The Warm Homes Discount the clown is muttering about does nothing to address the underlying problem of high energy prices – it is simply a redistribution from poor people to even poorer ones. (To be eligible, you need to be on some sort of benefit, such as Pension and Universal Credit). It is worth £150 pa, which will of course soon be wiped out by Miliband’s price increases!
Clean energy superpower! The meaningless rantings of Ed Miliband.
As for that “rollercoaster”, it is currently near the top – we should be taking a free ride to the bottom, not locking ourselves into 20-year fixed high prices for renewables.
This article (It’s Official–Mad Miliband’s Plan Will Push Up Electricity Prices By £265 A Year) was created and published by Not a Lot of People Know That and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Paul Homewood
See Related Article Below
Blob: Miliband’s policies will add £150 to bills by 2030
Even the pro-Net Zero posse now admit that it’s going to cost more and more and more.
BEN PILE
According to The Times, a new study of the governments energy policies claims that they will increase electricity bills by £150.
The rise is a result of the huge investment being made by the government in low-carbon power and upgrading Britain’s electricity network, which will be paid off by consumers over the coming decades.
The Times goes on:
Ben James, an independent energy analyst who wrote the report, said that while renewable power was crucial for British energy security, the government “must ensure that the resulting system is cheaper”.
“The single most important objective for consumers and for decarbonisation is making electricity cheap,” he said. “Only 10 per cent of UK emissions come from electricity production. We will not eliminate the remaining 90 per cent — which comes primarily from heating and transport — without cheap electricity.”
James’ website explains his background:
- I work at Axle Energy, where we are building the future of the power grid.
- Worked on the IPCC‘s Sixth Assessment Report
Built Octopus Electric Vehicle’s pricing platform
So it’s not as if James is a Net Zero sceptic. And as I explained in the video, James joins the voices of many energy company CEOs who are now recognising that Net Zero is a massive political liability. Says the Times.
The analysis echoed warning by leading energy retailers that the cost of clean power was pushing up bills. Executives from Octopus Energy, Britain’s largest household energy supplier, and from EDF and E.On told MPs that the increasing cost of investment that is added to bills risked outweighing any potential falls in wholesale prices.
That is a complete turnaround from the Stranded Assets hypothesis and ESG principles, which have preached that climate change is the greater risk. “Stranded Assets” was the idea developed at the University of Oxford’s green blob-funded department, that climate change would mobilise an angry public to either take action themselves, or demand the government take action against companies that fail to reduce their emissions. This, among other ‘climate risks’ ought to be disclosed, argued these carbon wonks, just as companies are required to publish statements on their exposure to financial risks in statutory filings to financial regulators. Which is what ESG is all about.
But I digress… As is its characteristic, the criticism falls on deaf ears, with little between them, at DESNZ. The Times, again:
The government said that analysis over-estimated the future costs of decarbonising the grid and “ignored the benefits of clean energy”.
“Energy bills are still too high, which is why the government is taking urgent action to support families this winter, including expanding the £150 warm home discount to 2.7 million more households,” they said.
“The only way to bring down energy bills for good is by making Britain a clean energy superpower, which will get us off the rollercoaster of fossil fuel prices and onto clean, homegrown power that we control.”
The “Clean Energy Superpower” line isn’t as much a policy agenda as a mantra. It is what the civil servants and ministers at DESNZ utter, in the same way that a caveman grunts.
From our side of the fence, predictions are far less optimistic even than Ben James’s. In a report for Net Zero Watch, Professor Gordon Hughes estimates that:
Ed Miliband’s Clean Power 2030 plan will add at least £25 billion per year to the cost of the electricity system. This will cause prices to soar, hitting every household in the UK with a cost-of-living increase of over £900.
This article (Blob: Miliband’s policies will add £150 to bills by 2030) was created and published by Ben Pile and is republished here under “Fair Use”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply