WE’VE TIPPED

PAUL SUTTON

The most shocking thing about the acquittal of this throat-cutting advocate, using a gesture synonymous with Jihadist slaughter?

UNARGUABLE PROOF OF TWO-TIER JUSTICE

That it’s not a shock. We all know that if someone demanded murder for far-left activists, they’d serve a lengthy jail sentence after fast-tracking and denial of bail. No year-long wait for a fake trial, on bail, while Starmer and Hermer nobbled the system. Nor pathetic excuses about ADHD or trauma.

Just ask Lucy Connolly, denied bail and rushed into jail, because of her beliefs and who she’s married to: a Tory councillor. Coerced into a guilty plea and treated horribly cruelly in jail, denied access to her daughter and sick husband. Starmer directly intervened to ensure she got no bail, so was forced to plead guilty. Anyone can see that, if she was too risky to bail, then the maniacal Jones was doubly so. And why did his trial have an activist judge and the verdict come just before her release? So much for an ‘independent judiciary’! It’s got Starmer’s fingerprints all over it.

Connolly’s tweet was an order-of-magnitude less dangerous than Jones’s murderous demand. But she was jailed for her politics – a shocking and irrefutable indictment, of our liberal elite.

The BBC, The Guardian et al thought Xmas had come early. Their enthusiasm for her political imprisonment makes them mouthpieces for tyranny, joke organisations whose position on anything and everything is risible.

They haven’t condemned Ricky Jones’s position, of advocating murder for those who protested at Southport. Why would they? It’s something they – in effect – feel sympathy for.

So let’s be clear:

If’ you’re on the left, from an ethnic minority and shout things which appeal to progressives, you’ve a free-pass to say anything – and increasingly, to do anything. Because, at heart, most progressives want to see violence against those who disagree with them. This has been obvious for many decades, to anyone who’s had to deal with them. I know many teachers who openly support violence against ‘the far Right’ – i.e. anyone who raises issues about immigration and open borders.

It you’re not on the left and disagree with progressives, your freedom of speech doesn’t exist – and calls for your murder aren’t ‘serious’. Oh sure, feeble condemnations can be made, but always with a bias that the madness of someone like Jones is ‘understandable’.

We’ve tipped into anarcho-tyranny, and it’s been done deliberately by Starmer et al. But it’s important to realise many (not all) on the left-liberal side have always advocated it. Anyone who was at college in the 1980s could see this coming.

When I say tipped, I mean it’s now irreversible. Widespread political violence is underway, and is being stoked by this government, the police and our judiciary.

---

This article (WE’VE TIPPED) was created and published by Paul Sutton and is republished here under “Fair Use”

In Britain, It’s Illegal to Use Violent Language Metaphorically, But Perfectly Legal to Literally Instruct People to Slit the Throats of Others

The difference is based on whether or not you are aligned with the Labour Party and leftist values.

JUPPLANDIA

Just a short one today on Britain’s two tier justice system.

At the time of the Southport riots Lucy Connolly, a mother with no prior criminal record, was one of many British people arrested and rushed through a swift trial during a period in which the British Prime Minister (a lawyer himself) was prejudicing their cases by calling them all far right thugs and instructing judges in both public and private exhortations to throw the book at them.

Connolly had posted that she did not care if asylum centres burned down. The post was removed within 4 hours, but was clearly rhetorical and not literal. Connolly had said too that she did not care if every Brirish politician was in the place when it burned. This was the intemperate language of frustration, clearly describing an unreal scenario, and expressing despair and anger rather than instructions to violence and arson.

She didn’t tell anyone to do it. She said she didn’t care if it happened.

But the book was duly, and according to Kier Starmer’s explicit instructions, thrown at her. She was to be made an example of, like Peter Lynch was too, and many others. Anti migrant protestors were rounded up en masse, even if they had never attended a protest and never taken part in any street demonstration, whether peaceful or violent in nature.

Criminals already inside were released early to free spaces for these, in many cases, purely political, ideological prisoners guilty of online thought crimes.

(See https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13759471/Labours-amnesty-day-2000-prisoners-set-released-early-day-month-order-free-space-convicted-riots.html).

At the same time a serving Labour councillor addressed a crowd of leftist activists. He told them, in rhetoric only slightly more deranged than that of the Prime Minister, that all anti migrant, anti asylum and anti immigrant murders and rapes of children protesters, were Nazis. Everyone who objected publicly to children being murdered (the spark that lit the Southport protests) was a Nazi.

And then he told them, he instructed them, to go and slit the throats of those protestors.

Unlike Connolly’s trial for hateful language and incitement to violence, the trial of Labour councillor Ricky Jones was strangely delayed. Hers was rushed through….his was repeatedly delayed. Perhaps the intention was for us to forget what he said, and how much more literal his violent language was than that of Lucy Connolly’s tweet.

The verdict has just been returned. Sickeningly, in a travesty of justice given the context of the draconian treatment of people like Connolly or Peter Lynch (the 61 year old imprisoned and driven to suicide in prison for the crime of calling the police and politicians corrupt at a Southport protest), Jones was found not guilty.

Apparently telling people to kill others is fine, if you are a Labour Party leftist when you do it.

If you are the wife of a Conservative councillor in the UK and post online rhetorically that you don’t care if something bad happens to asylum hotels, you go to prison for 31 months for encouraging violence after a rushed trial where you have been processed as rapidly as possible.

If you are a serving Labour councillor who literally tells people in person to slit the throats of protestors you disagree with, you are not guilty and after your case has been delayed until everyone hopefully forgets about it, you are free to go.

Two tier policing, two tier sentencing, two tier sick, depraved injustice.

My country is a shithole. A tyrannical, failed, joke of a nation that pisses all over the freedom of its own, and would be considered a horrifying vision of Hell by any of the better generations that built it.

The contrast of the Lucy Connolly and Ricky Jones cases could not make it any clearer. Our judges and police enforce a leftist tyranny where those aligned with or championed by Labour can call for murder, while those who oppose leftwing policies online have no freedom of speech at all even if their language is clearly non literal.

Connolly said ‘I do not care if…’.

Jones said ‘slit their throats’.

But Connolly rots in prison and Jones walks free.

Jones was filmed telling people to murder other people. A flat out, unambiguous instruction to kill.

No sane person could look at the contrast of these statements and these judgements without realising there is no justice in the UK and without realising that the basic principle of equal justice before the law is completely dead here.

The phrase two tier justice does little to express how fundamentally wrong, how astonishingly corrupt and malign, such contrasts in sentencing are. They are the kind of disparities by which the law becomes worse than anarchy, and by which governments and systems of rule, through the egregious injustice of their actions, demand their own removal. Few right minded people can really tolerate this level of obvious injustice. The heart revels at it, and the soul is sickened by it. Repeat it long enough and you push people to violent uprising, and give people no recourse to protest or overturn such things and you, as a system, demand that they turn to violence.

You simply cannot imprison a Lucy Connolly and refuse to imprison a Ricky Jones without everyone knowing that your justice system stinks and may well be beyond redemption or reform. You cannot with one hand deny freedom of speech, and with the other allow calls to murder, without your rule being right.y considered illegitimate. Contrasts like this are utterly corrosive to the social fabric of the nation and to the idea that we live in a system of equal justice under rules that must be respected.

That idea, upon which really all civil order rests, is murdered by such contrasts.

---

This article (In Britain, It’s Illegal to Use Violent Language Metaphorically, But Perfectly Legal to Literally Instruct People to Slit the Throats of Others) was created and published by Jupplandia and is republished here under “Fair Use”

Featured image: Yahoo News

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.