Immigration: timebomb Britain
RICHARD NORTH
After the events yesterday, and the days preceding, it is fair to say that, in the manner of the doomsday clock which stands at five minutes to midnight, the countdown to a massive explosion of public anger over illegal immigration has brought us to a hairsbreadth of detonation.
The countdown started with a vengeance in early July when Ethiopian asylum seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, fresh off the boat from France, was charged by Epping Police with a number of offences, amounting to three counts of sexual assault, one count of inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity, and one count of harassment without violence.
This scum was quickly traced back to the Bell Hotel in Epping, one of the many hotels sequestered by the government to house illegal immigrants, whence there started what was to become a series of demonstrations outside the hotel which quickly escalated into a major showdown with the police.
Days later, the protests were spreading to other locations, as far spread as Portsmouth and Diss in Norfolk. And, as rumours spread that illegal immigrants from the Bell Hotel were to be moved 17 miles to the Britannia International Hotel on Canary Wharf, which had been newly vacated to permit the housing of illegals, another demonstration started up there.
In the event, it wasn’t until the early hours of Saturday morning that migrants were bussed but, despite the attempt at secrecy, the move was noted, and the hotel became the focus of another demonstration on Sunday.
Initially, this was a demonstration with a difference, populated mainly by women and children, many of them wearing pink clothing, with much waving of Union and St George’s Cross flags to the chant of “stop the boats”. The intention, we are told, was to raise awareness of how women and young people are being “let down” by the migrant crisis.
Through live streaming of the event, we were able to watch the demonstration as it unfolded during the day, and the proceedings were peaceful enough despite an impromptu sit-in which had the police threatening to arrest protesters if they didn’t move – in marked contrast to the treatment afforded to Just Stop Oil campaigners.
Only latterly did a small gang of youths show up, some masked, letting off coloured smoke flares and intent on confronting the police. Violence briefly flared, described in lurid terms by the legacy media as an attempt was made to charge the fence surrounding the hotel. As the group was repelled, the youths ran back in the direction from whence they had come. Some were caught by the police and several arrests were made.
Long after the violence had subsided, with protesters and spectators aimlessly milling around in the street outside the hotel, in what was then teeming rain, a phalanx of uniformed police marched down the road with individual officers breaking off, each addressing groups of the crowd.
The upshot of this was that the police were invoking Section 42 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, alleging that the individuals were “causing distress and alarm” to the illegal immigrants in the hotel.
The people – protesters and onlookers alike – were ordered to leave immediately and informed that they were not to return within 28 days to the area. They were told that, if they did not comply with the order, they would be arrested.
This, to say the least, was an interesting development. The section in question, under the heading “Police directions stopping the harassment etc of a person in his home”, is very specific in its requirements.
For sure, if a constable believes that the presence of that person “amounts to, or is likely to result in, the harassment of the resident; or is likely to cause alarm or distress to the resident” of a dwelling, then a direction may be given, but only if certain criteria have first been satisfied.
Firstly, the person to who the direction is addressed must be present outside or in the vicinity of the premises in question (for the purposes of the law, a hotel can be a “dwelling”).
Then, that person – couched in legalistic terms – must be there “for the purpose of representing to, or otherwise persuading, the resident … that he should not do something that he is entitled or required to do or that he should do something that he is not under any obligation to do”.
In practical terms, that would amount to the crowd chanting something like “Go home now!” or words to that effect, or – perhaps – “get out of the hotel!”. An amount of imagination could provide other examples, but the police would have needed to use that imagination as well. In no way in any of substantial video coverage of the events was the crowd – even by its presence – threatening the asylum seekers or calling on them to take any specific action.
To any impartial observer, this was quite evidently an abuse of power – police over-reach as a means of terminating to the demonstration, which people had every right to attend.
Predictably, the web exploded with outrage, and rightly so, charging that the police were abusing the law to close down the demonstration at the Britannia Hotel.
Only several hours later did the Metropolitan Police sheepishly post a statement declaring: “We have not banned protests outside the Britannia International Hotel. We continue to encourage those exercising their lawful right to protest to do so responsibly”.
Officers, the Met claimed, had policed a protest for a considerable time “but a group remained who were harassing occupants of the hotel and staff, trying to prevent people accessing the hotel to make deliveries and making concerted efforts to breach the fencing and access the hotel”.
Their actions, the statement said, “went well beyond protest to harassment and we used powers under the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 to order that specific group to leave and not return for 28 days”. It added: “If a different group wishes to protest in the vicinity of the hotel they are not banned from doing so, providing they do so lawfully”.
That, as the video link I have provided amply demonstrates, is an outright lie. The group which had caused the trouble were long gone and the police were using the Section 42 direction indiscriminately to close down the whole demonstration.
But this was by no means the extent of the provocation that the day brought. Earlier, the Mail and other media brought news that two Afghan asylum seekers had been charged with the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl. Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, had been charged with the rape of the underage girl in Nuneaton, Warwickshire while a second man, Mohammad Kabir, also 23, had been charged with aiding and abetting rape, as well as strangulation and kidnap of the girl.
That was bad enough but Warwickshire Police – demonstrating that they had learned nothing from Southport the previous year – had advised local councillors and officials not to reveal the asylum seeker background of the two suspects, for fear of “inflaming community tensions”.
This was the very dynamic which had triggered the series of riots after the identity of Axel Rudakubana had been withheld, and the thinking behind the Rotherham cover-up. And here the police are again, trying to manage the flow of information for fear of “inflaming community tensions”.
But no sooner had that information been absorbed then The Sun reported that a Sudanese asylum seeker, Edris Abdelrazig, had been arrested in Stockport for allegedly trying to kidnap a 10-year-old girl. Abdelrazig had been quartered in a three-star, £100-a-night hotel in the leafy Manchester suburb of Wilmslow.
The English people have a reputation of being slow to anger, but it was the sexual aggression of an asylum seeker which sparked this current round of protests. And while this criminal behaviour is continuing unabated, the police are intervening on behalf of asylum seekers to shut down protests on the grounds that they were “causing distress and alarm” to these illegal immigrants.
Tolerance and patience have been stretched to breaking point and beyond. If the authorities now find that they have roused the anger of the English, they have only themselves to blame.
See Related Article Below
In the dead of night, illegals were transported into the luxury Britannia Hotel to continue unrelenting sexual attacks on our young girls – but London mums have had enough
Patriots were not put off by shocking threats & smears from authorities, Antifa & the MSM
DAN WOOTTON
So, it wasn’t a far right conspiracy after all, was it?
In the dead of night over the weekend, illegals were transported into Canary Wharf’s luxury Britannia International Hotel – ready to deal drugs, terrorise the streets while delivering food badly for Uber Eats and Deliveroo, and, most horrifically, continue the unrelenting sexual attacks on our young girls.
Now what happened next was extraordinary, with the illegals immediately beginning work in the black economy, being seen driving out of the hotel on (no doubt stolen) motorcycles within hours of being there.
However, despite shocking threats and smears from the authorities, Antifa and the mainstream media, the mums of London decided they were not going to let their resistance to the wholescale invasion of the United Kingdom and takeover of their local community by people out to destroy the lives of their daughters see them be silenced.
As Alex Phillips wrote to the pink protestors…
Dear Wonderful Women
I know who you are.
You work bloody hard in your jobs, and bloody hard for your families. You are straight talking mothers and grandmothers, ready to help anybody and give them a cup of tea, but also ready to give your own a clip round the ear.
You are the soul of this Great Nation and will fight to protect it.
It’s the women that win wars at the end of the day, and you are ready to fight for your daughters and their daughters daughters.
You are modern day suffragettes and we owe you a debt of gratitude for your steely determination, but also your warmth and humour underneath that resolve. And bloody hell have you been patient while the wankers of Whitehall have betrayed everything you have built.
Starmer has picked the wrong people to mess with, because you ladies do not give up. It’s not in your DNA.
All power to your elbows, you glorious ladies.
I, and the rest of Britain, bloody adore you.
VIOLENCE COMING FROM HARD LEFT
Of course, none of this fits the establishment narrative.
Because this weekend the only violence has come from the hard left Antifa mob in another part of London, encouraged by Jeremy Corbyn, Diane Abbott and Narinder Kaur, with illegals at the Thistle Hotel in Barbican taunting patriotic protestors out of windows while the hooded hard left mob happily chanted all cops are bastards.
Quite a contrast to the London mums in pink dancing the conga and spreading true English joy outside the Brittania.
As Chris Rose put it…
A striking difference at the Barbican hotel in London.
Concerned parents peacefully protesting against illegal migration no face masks.Far left agitators, military style balaclavas to hide their identity, calling others “Nazis”.
Can we talk about the far left problem?
We should; indeed, we must. I have been warning about how Antifa, following the American playbook, have been infiltrating peaceful and patriotic protests in the UK since last year’s Southport Massacre.
Yet by the end of Sunday, it was the patriots punished with cops, in Tommy Robinson words, slapping a section 42 order on the Britannia Hotel, although they later clarified they were targeting a specific group of protestors who they said were targeting the illegals inside the hotel.
So not the peaceful mums then. Hmm…
CENTRIST DADS LOSE CONTROL
All weekend there were examples up and down our great country of patriots expressing their fears for Britain in powerful democratic uprisings while the hard left resorted to sickening violence designed to scupper free speech.
As Douglas Carswell said responding to the scenes in Manchester…
Centrist dads and Times columnists. It’s not your country any more
It’s not like we don’t have a right to be angry, given the threat this unrelenting invasion of our southern border is posing to our children.
Just this weekend two Afghan illegals – Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, and Mohammad Kabir, 23 – were both charged in connection with the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton, a quiet Warwickshire town.
The Mail on Sunday revealed one has been charged with aiding and abetting rape, as well as strangulation and kidnap of the girl, who is now receiving specialist care..
Despite the huge interest the incident, sources told the newspaper that Warwickshire Police advised local councillors and officials not to reveal the illegal background of the two suspects, for fear of “inflaming community tensions”.
As Colin Brazier put it, “if true, this is staggering”.
And it appears to be, with Reform’s 19-year-old wunderkind George Finch, the leader of Warwickshire County Council, writing to the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper and Chief Constable of Warwickshire Police demanding they disclose the immigration statuses of the two men charged.
In his letter, the teenager wrote…
As you will know, the alleged perpetrator is an asylum seeker who currently lives in a HMO (Housing of Multiple Occupancy). This has caused unease locally as residents have very easily been able to join the dots together and have concluded that this man is an asylum seeker. Residents of Warwickshire can see that they have not been told the full story.
This is a gravely concerning development; if these accusations turn out to be true, it indicates that organised crime centering around the abuse of young girls is present in Warwickshire. This is unacceptable. In light of this development, I am calling on the Home Office to immediately remove and rehouse all asylum seekers currently living in HMOs within Warwickshire. Our community has had enough of the Home Office breaking planning regulations to turn sections of local communities into unrecognisable, ghetto-like zones.
But it is true. This is happening every single damn day. And the MSM and politicians are hiding behind contempt of court to avoid the British public knowing the truth about what’s really going on. Things cannot go on like this…
WATCH: ADVANCE UK LEADER BEN HABIB JOINS OUTSPOKEN TO RESPOND TO THE COVER UP AND REVEAL THE SIGNIFICANCE OF TOMMY ROBINSON JOINING HIS NEW PARTY
This article (In the dead of night, illegals were transported into the luxury Britannia Hotel to continue unrelenting sexual attacks on our young girls – but London mums have had enough) was created and published by Dan Wootton and is republished here under “Fair Use”
Asylum: enough is enough
PETE NORTH
It’s been a weekend of “rising tensions” over dinghy migrants. The government is no closer to a resolution and one gets a sense that they’ve learned absolutely nothing from Southport in terms of narrative management. Consequently, the protests are getting larger and more dangerous. The conditions are such that it wouldn’t take much to spark wider unrest.
This is not helped by the news that two Afghan asylum seekers had been charged with the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl. Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, had been charged with the rape of the underage girl in Nuneaton, Warwickshire while a second man, Mohammad Kabir, also 23, had been charged with aiding and abetting rape, as well as strangulation and kidnap of the girl.
Any normal person would look at this and say enough is enough. There simply isn’t an economic or moral argument for admitting the dregs of the third world. It’s not even as though this is a one-off, but even one such incident is enough to call time on the entire asylum system.
With the recent revelations that migrants housed in hotels at the taxpayers expense are working illegally for firms such as Deliveroo, the case for housing migrants in hotels (if ever there was one) collapses. We must now look to secure detention.
To that end I am not interested in hard-man performative cruelty, sending migrants to the Highlands or the Falklands. Any interim solution must have the smallest financial footprint possible. It doesn’t matter where migrants are detained so long as they are detained. There is nothing wrong with using former RAF bases such as Scampton and Linton on Ouse just so long as it’s secure detention and that migrants are not free to roam.
While we’re at it, we need simultaneous enforcement of vagrancy laws to clear out the tent cities springing up around London. Those with no right to be here must be escorted to one of the camps. This is on the understanding that they are free to leave at any time provided they’re volunteering to return to their country of origin.
There should be no private sector involvement at this point. If there’s one thing we proved with Afghanistan and Iraq it’s that we are more than capable of establishing large temporary bases. This is now a defence issue, and as such, the use of military bases is wholly appropriate. It’s time to let the MoD do the one thing it’s actually good at.
But, of course, Labour will not do this. They will try everything except tackling the issue head on. They will instead attempt to distribute migrants throughout the country, into social housing and private lets if necessary, concealing the costs wherever they can. They are not going to remove any of the incentives and we are going to see more rapes and sexual assaults.
They will, in fact, allow it to worsen. They have made it abundantly clear that your concerns are not their concerns. Your safety and the safety of your children is not a priority. What does concern them is that you might not passively accept this as normal. In light of that they will censor media and curtail your freedoms. Britain will continue to welcome uncapped numbers of third-world dependents even they are sexual incontinent predators.
We can assume this is official government policy because no meaningful steps have been taken to suggest otherwise. Your approval is not sought. Your function is to pay for it. You do not get to choose differently. They are engineering a situation where violence is the only likely outcome. The only mystery here is why the rape of a twelve year old girl has not already sparked wider civil unrest.
That day will come though. Possibly soon, but no later than this time next year. We still have a warm August ahead of us, and more protests to come. Reading the temperature, I do not see the public putting up with yet another summer of wholesale asylum fraud – especially when we learn that a record number of migrants are claiming asylum despite arriving in the UK with legal visas. The legitimacy of the entire system, and its administrators, is collapsing.
As such, it is perhaps MP constituency offices we should be protesting. They’re just as much freeloading squatters as the migrants. They got where they are through fraud and on false pretenses, they cost us a fortune, and they’re the ones who allow the invasion. We need to turn the heat up on them and remind them who they work for.
This article (Asylum: enough is enough) was created and published by Pete North and is republished here under “Fair Use”
Featured image: Getty Images
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply