How Flying the Flag Became a Symbol of Revolt

How flying the flag became a symbol of revolt

Operation Raise the Colours is a quiet rebellion against multiculturalism and national self-loathing.

TOM SLATER

A nation in which hoisting the national flag has become somewhere between a provocation and an act of resistance probably isn’t in rude health. But that’s where we’re at in Britain in 2025, with local councils hastily ripping down England and Union flags, put up by groups of grassroots activists.

Hot on the heels of the pink ladies’ protests outside migrant hotels, Operation Raise the Colours is the latest organic, decidedly patriotic, social-media-driven initiative whose success can be measured in the outsized, outraged, utterly predictable reaction it is receiving. While councils continue to remove the flags, on health-and-safety and property-maintenance grounds, identitarian rent-a-gob Kehinde Andrews was invited on to Good Morning Britain yesterday to insist that the Saint George’s Cross is racist and this campaign is a faux-patriotic stunt by the fash. Presumably, Dr Shola was busy.

The sudden, nationwide explosion of Operation Raise the Colours is basically all the proof you need that this isn’t being driven by the far right – a pathetic fringe in British political life that has long struggled to fill a minibus. Apparently beginning in Birmingham, the campaign has since spread to Swindon, Bradford, Newcastle, Norwich and London. Like the migrant-hotel protests, it seems to be decentralised, leaderless, rallied on Facebook and group chats.

It’s a fascinating, bottom-up campaign against a now undeniable, galling double standard – that in ‘multicultural’ Britain all identities are to be celebrated except for Englishness and Britishness. Tellingly, England and Union flags began emerging in Northfield in south Brum around the same time that the Library of Birmingham was lit up in green and white for Pakistan’s independence day. While Birmingham City Council was quick to take down the England flags – insisting these fluttering pieces of polyester, zip-tied 10-feet-high on to lampposts, posed an intolerable risk to public safety – a leaked email has revealed local officials were so scared to remove the ubiquitous Palestine flags that have emerged in the city since the Israel-Hamas war began that council workers were given extra security.

So it is in Tower Hamlets. Since 2022, the east London borough has been run by mayor Lutfur Rahman’s Aspire party, a pro-Gaza, overwhelmingly Bangladeshi outfit that is always happy to play pork-barrel identity politics, in an area that is 40 per cent Muslim and 35 per cent Bangladeshi. Hence, when Palestine flags began to appear across the borough, the council dragged its feet for months, claiming removing them would ‘destabilise community cohesion’. It only relented when forced to by an independent lawyers’ report, arguing the flags contravened planning laws, and threats of legal action. Rahman, begrudgingly announcing their removal, insisted the flags weren’t divisive and lamented ‘Islamophobic smears’ on the borough.

Wouldn’t you know it, Tower Hamlets council was markedly more decisive when those England and Union flags began appearing on those selfsame lampposts. For much of the past week, locals have been playing a game of cat and mouse with council workers, with flags appearing, being taken down, before being raised again. There have also been some ugly shouting matches. Call me a cynic, but I dare say this more robust response isn’t entirely down to the council’s new, hard-earned understanding of the Town and Country Planning Act. Rahman, for one, has been noticeably hesitant to defend the flag-hoisters this time around.

It speaks to the mush that multiculturalism has made of many people’s minds that, of all the flags, those of the nation in which we all live are treated as divisive – as some sinister expression of white ethnic aggro, rather than standards to which we all might rally. Claims that the Saint George’s Cross or Union flag remain irrevocably corrupted by the dark days of the National Front or the British National Party feel rather retro, not to mention circular. After all, if you’re that worried about fascists co-opting your flag, maybe don’t go around insisting your flag is synonymous with fascism? This is really about a queasy discomfort with Englishness and Britishness among not just unabashed minority sectarians, but also white elites who are pickled in multicultural identity politics and gripped by national self-loathing.

There is always a danger that a patriotic pushback against multiculturalism, mass migration and their many discontents could curdle around the edges into a kind of mirror-image ethnic politics of victimhood. The fart-sniffing freaks of the Very Online right are certainly keen to push things in that direction. But at the migrant-hotel protests spiked has covered, which are always a sea of England and Union flags, I haven’t seen much of that at all. You can often barely get a question out with most demonstrators before they feel moved to tell you – in no uncertain terms – that they are absolutely not ‘far right’ and that their opposition to illegal migration has nothing to do with race, often peppered with glowing reference to their mixed-race kids and grandkids. When we were filming at one of the Canary Wharf demonstrations last month, we were struck to find a sizeable contingent of incensed legal migrants.

If you’ll forgive the obligatory Orwell quote, recent events have put me in mind of the great man’s encapsulation of patriotism, from his wartime opus, The Lion and the Unicorn. He called it ‘a devotion to something that is always changing and yet is felt to be mystically the same. It is a bridge between the future and the past.’ What is stirring across the country is not a revolt against a Britain that looks very different in 2025 than it did in 1941, but against changes that no one asked for, and are blowing up the bridges that any nation relies upon.

Tom Slater is editor of spiked. Follow him on X: @Tom_Slater


This article (How flying the flag became a symbol of revolt) was created and published by Spiked Online and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Tom Slater

See Related Article Below

“Hateful” Professor Who Insists St George’s Flag “Represents Racism, Not Patriotism” and Should be Changed

 

RICHARD ELDRED

A Good Morning Britain guest has sparked outrage by claiming the St George’s flag is “racist” and should be replaced. The Mail has more.

Controversial black studies professor Kehinde Andrews, who has previously attacked Britain and the Royal Family, claimed England’s national flag was deep-rooted in racism amid a row over a “patriotic outpouring” around the country.

An online movement called ‘Operation Raise the Colours’ has led to communities across the country hanging up Union Jack and St George’s flags, including in Birmingham, London, Bradford, Newcastle and Norwich. …

Speaking on Good Morning Britain on Tuesday, Prof Andrews weighed into the nationwide debate, telling hosts Adil Ray and Kate Garraway that the history of the flag has always been problematic and “represents racism”.

Prof Andrews, Professor of Black Studies at Birmingham City University, said: “It’s not that the far-Right has co-opted the flag. It’s that we don’t understand what this country is and the history of both of these symbols.

“Both of these flags are the flags that were flown on ships that enslaved my ancestors; those are the flags that the British Army marched into places like Pakistan, India, Bengal, Africa and colonised 25% of the world.

“The reason the far-Right picks up these flags and has consistently since the 60s, 70s, since my parents’ generation have been in the country is because these flags represent the racism that they are putting out into the world.

“This campaign of putting these flags up, this is not some benign ‘let’s just be patriotic’… go and search ‘Operation Raise the Colours’ and you will find the same far-Right, Little England, this nonsense-spewing about migrant hotels… this is what it’s about.”

He added: “People aren’t putting up these flags to celebrate Britain, they’re putting up this flag to remind us that Britain is white and we shouldn’t be here.”

Prof Andrews… once declared that the late Queen Elizabeth II was “the number one symbol of white supremacy in the world” and claimed the British Empire was “far worse than the Nazis”.

Worth reading in full.

Via The Daily Sceptic

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*