ER Editor: Here is the link to the UK Government’s website on the Online Safety Act.
The Expose offers us this take from Christopher Snowden on the effects of the new act —
The UK’s Online Safety Act is normalising rule-breaking and driving a wedge between the state and the people
Of note, VPN’s —
At the end of July, the Online Safety Act introduced age verification for accessing “adult content” in the UK. It has led to a surge in interest in Virtual Private Networks (“VPNs”) to bypass the restrictions.
The increased use of VPNs will drive a wedge between the state and people, normalising rule-breaking and contributing to a breakdown of trust in the Government, similar to what has been seen with smokers and gamblers who find ways to circumvent regulations.
***
Popcorn tip: note how this is rolled out at the same time as the migrant hotels’ crisis is building up. So what is the big topic that gets censored right out the gate? …

A reminder from France since late 2022 —

********
Government Censorship Of The Internet Is Worse Than EVER In The UK
Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news
It’s been one week since the British government’s odious ‘Online Safety Act’ came into force and basically everything on the Internet is now blocked.
The legislation was presented as an effort to protect children from seeing things they shouldn’t be seeing online.
However, to absolutely no one’s surprise, it’s already being used to eviscerate free speech.
The first thing that was blocked were videos of protests outside hotels where the government is housing illegal immigrants on the taxpayer’s dime.
British users of X shared screenshots of messages that popped up while they attempted to view footage from the protests, which started in Epping after a migrant sexually assaulted a teenage girl and have since spread around the country.
But they won’t stop burglars and thieves. Backwards. pic.twitter.com/Bas7F4MXb7
— m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) July 27, 2025
The Telegraph report states:
An elite team of police officers is to monitor social media for anti-migrant sentiment amid fears of summer riots.
Detectives will be drawn from forces across the country to take part in a new investigations unit that will flag up early signs of potential civil unrest.
The division, assembled by the Home Office, will aim to “maximise social media intelligence” gathering after police forces were criticised over their response to last year’s riots.
Probably purely a coincidence, right?
Also probably purely a coincidence that a shady government outfit now known as the National Security and Online Information Team (NSOIT) has been lobbying social media companies to take action against users who post what it describes as “concerning narratives” about immigration and ‘two tier policing’.
Previously known as the ‘Counter Disinformation Unit’, it was formerly tasked with identifying and monitoring COVID lockdown dissenters during the pandemic.
Today we learn that this spying operation actively used web trawling tools originally created to hunt for jihadist terrorists to find critics of ‘asylum’ hotels instead.
A Whitehall “disinformation” unit used tools created to hunt for jihadists to find critics of asylum hotels, The Telegraph can reveal
Read the full piece by Tony Diver here⤵️https://t.co/25vJWuJdWA pic.twitter.com/QrCcVGZqwY
— The Telegraph (@Telegraph) August 3, 2025
While censoring dissenting voices is evidently a primary focus for elements within the British Deep State, a whole host of other stuff has been blocked.
Whether this is intentional and nefarious, or just a result of the massively broad terms of what the government could possibly consider ‘harmful’ or ‘hateful’ content, or whether the social media companies just don’t know, or just don’t want to take any chances, remains to be determined.
X user Chris Middleton shared an enraging thread of some of the stuff Brits can’t see anymore.
The Online Safety Act has been in force for one week, and it’s already censoring rape victims, protest footage, and even lactose intolerance.
Starmer says it’s about protecting children. In reality, it’s stifling free speech.
Here’s what’s been censored so far🧵 pic.twitter.com/v3jv4l3Lvf
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
A rape gang survivor’s testimony? Blocked.
Sammy Woodhouse (@officialsammyuk) says “the UK’s Online Safety Act—put in place by our government—has done nothing but silence the victims.”
How does silencing survivors “protect” anyone?https://t.co/7orgbBQ8x2
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
Yes, can’t talk about that. We all know why.
Every day with this. But you’re a fascist if you protest it. https://t.co/q9ci4kqT6W
— m o d e r n i t y (@ModernityNews) August 3, 2025
Can you even see that post? Probably not if you’re in the UK.
And as already mentioned…
Protests against the government outside migrant hotels? Censored.@MorgothsReview reports footage of dissent being blocked.
Blocking videos of people protesting the government under legislation called the “Online Safety Act” is truly Orwellian.https://t.co/y0fzFq4Gum
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
A witty X account exposing how awful Britain has become, also blocked.
It gets more absurd. @kunley_drukpa says @MythoYookay, an account that ironically enough, satirises the UK’s decline, is also being censored.
When even satire is being restricted in the UK, things have clearly gone too far.https://t.co/nv1PZ2CiMT
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
A whole host of other innocuous things…
But it doesn’t stop there.
According to @cremieuxrecueil, their content on lactose intolerance, donkeys, and Neanderthals has been blocked.
This is what happens when MPs who can’t open a PDF start regulating global tech.https://t.co/uMQMS5kqWo
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
Spotify…You can’t listen to music now without the government’s permission.
It’s not just X. Reddit is also blocking content far beyond the scope of pornography.@freddienew reports that users cannot view the r/beer subreddit without submitting their ID.https://t.co/WIM52mByYr
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
Absolutely insane, and we’re only one week into this.
The Online Safety Act is clearly not just about protecting children.
It is a poorly worded law, written by people who don’t understand the internet.
Oh, and if you disagree with it, Labour says you’re “on the side of predators”.https://t.co/BnkmipDWDv
— Chris Middleton (@ChrisMid) August 1, 2025
A petition to repeal the censorship has almost half a million signatures at time of writing.
Over 467,300 signatures for repeal. https://t.co/EJ9BRbZ4f4
— Kathleen Tyson (@Kathleen_Tyson_) August 1, 2025
* * *
Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.
Source
Featured image source (right): https://expose-news.com/2025/08/02/online-safety-act-is-normalising-rule-breaking/
***********
Published to UK Reloaded from Europe Reloaded

.Featured Image: Modernity News
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.






Leave a Reply