News Ticker

Eva Vlaardingerbroek: The Rising Star of Dutch Politics Banned by Starmer

January 16, 2026 UKR Editor CENSORSHIP, GOVERNMENT 0

Eva Vlaardingerbroek: the rising star of Dutch politics banned by Starmer

KATHY GYNGELL

THOSE of you who used to watch Mark Steyn in the days before he was sacked by GB News will be familiar with Eva Vlaardingerbroek, a young Dutch aspiring politician remarkably blessed with brains and beauty, an academic with a Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in law.

Not that you would know from the MSM. According to all of them she is a scary right wing activist, a far right activist or an extreme right influencer. Enough to make you shiver. Oh goodness, I forgot, she is also a ‘Tommy Robinson ally’, just to ensure that the reader makes no mistake about it.

What is actually behind these labels? A young educated woman of independent thought who had the temerity to stand up for the Dutch farmers and demolish the then Dutch government’s nitrogen excuse. A young educated woman, even worse, who has committed the even more heinous crime of taking on modern feminism.

In a speech she stated that ‘neo-feminists have no reflection on what is retrograde or problematic about multiculturalism, especially on the subject that interests them: sexism. So, this feminism is indeed one of the biggest shams of our time’.

What’s not to agree with that? I do 100 per cent. And so do her 1.1 million followers on X.

As you can imagine, that has earned her some black marks. And that was just a beginning.

Following in the footsteps, I like to think, of TCW, Vlaardingerbroek spoke out as a firm critic of lockdowns, mRNA vaccines, and other covid restrictions,  making clear in a 2021 speech her deep concern that the Western world was ‘losing its freedom’.

She goes where angels fear to tread. In November 2023, she expressed her sympathy for former police officer Derek Chauvin after he had been stabbed in prison, calling him ‘a victim of mass formation psychosis and mob rule’ as well as declaring him innocent of the murder of George Floyd.

During the Russian invasion of Ukraine she criticised the Dutch government for delivering weapons to Ukraine and countered the mainstream narrative about Russia.

Most of all she continues to express her alarm about mass immigration and Islamism as it has affected her country and the West. She warns of the demographic change that’s happening under our noses.

Women, in the feminist left’s handbook, should not be allowed to think like that, let alone commit the most unforgivable crime of all of criticising our dear leader.

She did. Yes, a few days ago she tweeted about Sir Keir Starmer. And she did not mince her words. She said: ‘Keir Starmer wants to crack down on X under the pretense of “women’s safety”, whilst he’s the one allowing the ongoing rape and killing of British girls by migrant rape gangs. Evil, despicable man.’

That, on top of speaking at Robinson’s Unite the Kingdom rally last autumn, is most likely why she has been banned from travel to England by our wonderful Labour Government. Here she is explaining what happened to her:

No wonder the internet is on fire with outrage at the refusal to let this law-abiding woman enter the country while welcoming Hamas-supporting jihadis.

I can’t wait to see what our chief ally’s response to this latest example of British repression and tyranny is.

I think we can expect something fiery from the US Under Secretary of State who only yesterday condemned the Government for its persecution of Lucy Connelly.

This article (Eva Vlaardingerbroek: the rising star of Dutch politics banned by Starmer) was created and published by Conservative Woman and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Kathy Gyngell

See Related Article Below

Two-Tier Britain: Banning Conservatives, Welcoming Extremists


MATT GOODWIN

Here is a story you might have missed and one that tells us a great deal about how utterly absurd Britain has become.

Eva Vlaardingerbroek — a 29-year-old Dutch lawyer, commentator, and conservative influencer — has just been banned from entering Britain.

Her electronic travel authorisation revoked. No due process. No clear explanation. Just a curt line from the Home Office:

“Your presence in the UK is not considered conducive to the public good.”

Let that sink in.

A peaceful citizen. No criminal record. No charges. No convictions.

Her crime?

Holding and expressing conservative views that challenge the prevailing liberal consensus among Western elites.

Just look at the glaring double standard that is on display here and then try to tell me we do not live in a two-tier regime.

The very same British state that has rushed to ban a conservative influencer refuses to ban the Muslim Brotherhood, refuses to proscribe the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, and refuses to stop countless, unvetted ISIS sympathisers, extremists, terrorists and other criminals entering the country illegally on the small boats.

Britain now operates some of the weakest borders in the developed world. We tolerate illegal entry on an industrial scale. We allow foreign extremists to exploit asylum systems designed for genuine refugees.

We turn a blind eye to radical networks, criminal gangs, Islamists, and others in our prisons and on our streets because confronting them would be “politically difficult”.

But a conservative influencer with a large following? A woman who dares to speak about mass migration, crime, and national decline? She’s a threat to society.

Utterly ridiculous.

This is the very definition of a two-tier regime —one rule for those who challenge the failing consensus among Western elites such as Keir Starmer, and another rule for everybody else who backs them.

Eva herself put it plainly:

“I’ve been banned from travelling to the UK. They revoked my ETA. My presence is not considered conducive to the public good.”

Not conducive to the public good? For what? Speaking at conservative conferences? Criticising Keir Starmer in her videos? Speaking at a Tommy Robinson rally in London? Opposing mass immigration? Calling for remigration? Being friends with Elon Musk?

You do not have to agree with Eva’s views to think that in a free and democratic society she should have the right to share them. After all, it wasn’t that long ago that a certain Keir Starmer was urging the British people to elect as prime minister a man who described the Islamist terrorists Hamas and Hezbollah as “friends”.

What we are witnessing is not about national security. It is not about public safety. It is not about “extremism”.

It is about control.

It is about what I pointed to in a television debate this week —“authoritarian progressivism”—an instinctive impulse that runs through Keir Starmer, the Labour government, and even the British state to shut down and sideline any views that happen to challenge their failing policies.

They cannot inspire the people so they try to control the people. They cannot win the arguments so they try to shut them down.

And this is not an isolated case.

As I have written before, it is part of a much wider pattern — one that should deeply worry anyone who still thinks Britain is a free country that values individual liberty.

In recent weeks and months, we learned that computer games now warn British children that feeling concerned about mass immigration is “far-right.”

We discovered Home Office guidance that quietly blurs the line between terrorism and “counter-cultural” views, viewing conservatives as being somehow equivalent to terrorists.

We watched police turn up at people’s doors for tweets, retweets, jokes, opinions, even throwing people in jail because they happened to share strident remarks about immigration and broken borders on social media.

The message from the British state is becoming unmistakable: challenge the consensus and expect consequences.

This is why this latest case really matters.

Read about Matt’s plan for 2026: Something Big Is Coming

It is about whether ordinary citizens are still allowed to question policies that are clearly failing — on immigration, on crime, on social cohesion — without being smeared, surveilled, or silenced.

Eva Vlaardingerbroek is not British. But that’s almost beside the point. Because if the state can arbitrarily decide that a peaceful speaker is “not conducive to the public good,” with no explanation and no appeal, then nobody is safe from that logic.

Today, it is a Dutch activist who has called for an end to mass immigration. A few months ago, it was French intellectual Renaud Camus who was banned from entering the country because he had dared to suggest the peoples of Western nations are being “replaced”. A few years before that, it was Dutch politician Geert Wilders who suggested Western nations are at risk of “Islamification”.

Tomorrow, it could be me. It could be you. It could be any one of us who happen to share views that collide with the groupthink that is being forced upon us by a remote and self-serving ruling class.

As Eva herself said, with bitter irony:

“I’m a 29-year-old lawyer with no criminal record. But I have an opinion, and apparently that’s my crime.”

Exactly.

This is the same Britain where ministers lecture us endlessly about democracy, tolerance, human rights, and free speech.

The same Britain that claims moral authority on the world stage. The same Britain where politicians were “outraged” by President Trump and Vice-President Vance suggesting that Britain and Europe might have a very big problem with free speech. And the same Britain that now seems incapable of distinguishing between actual threats and ideological dissent.

Britain has not become authoritarian overnight. But it is drifting — steadily, quietly — towards something far colder and more illiberal than most people realise.

And cases like Eva’s matter precisely because they expose the truth. And the truth is now inescapable.

Britain, once the home of individual liberty and free speech, is no longer a country that is confident enough to debate ideas. It is a country that is increasingly afraid of them.

We cannot spread our message and share articles like this one to millions of people on social media and beyond each month without your support. The easiest way of supporting us is by upgrading and becoming a paid subscriber.

This article (Two-Tier Britain: Banning Conservatives, Welcoming Extremists) was created and published by Matt Goodwin and is republished here under “Fair Use”

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


Copyright © 2012 - 2026 | TLB Project™ LLC