FRANK HAVILAND
As I wrote earlier this week, Tuesday’s temporary High Court injunction against the housing of illegal immigrants at the Bell Hotel, Epping was supposed to be a victory for the British people. “The battle is over, now it’s time to win the war” I said, with the ill-deserved confidence of a Keir Starmer photoshoot. This is not the first time (as my girlfriend will readily confirm) that I have been somewhat premature in my exclamations. Regrettably, the battle has not been won. Home Secretary, Yvette ‘refugees welcome’ Cooper, has successfully appealed against the injunction via the Court of Appeal, with illegal migrants set to remain for the foreseeable future.
Not only is this the stupidest move by any government in living memory (do not be deceived by my boyish good looks, I’ve been around), it’s nothing short of open warfare declared against the British people. Cooper’s 11th hour Hail Mary ought to alert us to three unquestionable realities:
- Prioritising the sexual proclivities of illegal immigrants to Britain over the genuine and founded concerns of the native population, means that Starmer’s government is no longer even pretending not to be anti-British.
- When rape victims have less state-protection that their would-be rapists, two-tier justice is not only undeniable, but it’s also understated.
- As I have often previously argued, civil war is upon us – it’s just that only one side is fighting. After Cooper’s intervention, we must conclude that one side in this civil war has the additional backing of the State.
Not even the traitor’s traitor, Tony Blair, had the balls to show this much open contempt for the British people. There’s a reason why the Andrew Neather line “rub the right’s nose in diversity” is so oft-quoted – that’s because Blair and his acolytes understood, betraying the plebs and taking the piss out of them isn’t the best PR. Indeed, you can go back eight centuries and still discern that the absolute rulers of the time knew better than to mess with the people. If you had to précis King John’s signing of Magna Carta, it would probably go something like this: “Noblesse oblige dictates one has to at least pretend that the plebs have rights”.
It is hardly surprising that the Home Office went all-in against the Bell Hotel injunction. Cooper and her ilk know only too well that if Epping’s case were successful, it would undermine the entire illegal migrant scam. The government would then be forced to employ an unthinkable no-nonsense approach to the migrant crisis: A) either deport the freeloading scumbags as any normal country would, or B) allow the daughters of rich bastards to get raped in the name of ‘diversity’. Doesn’t really bear thinking about, does it?
While he did not use exactly the same language, the aptly-named Lord Justice Bean echoed my sentiments on Friday:
“If an outbreak of protest enhances a case, this runs the risk of acting as an impetus for further protests – some of which may be disorderly – around asylum accommodation. There is a risk of encouraging further lawlessness.”
Furthermore:
“The judge’s approach ignores the obvious consequence that the closure of one site means capacity needs to be identified elsewhere in the system.”
The most damning statement in the proceedings, was the admission in all but name that the rights of illegals trump those of their prey. Here again was Lord Justice Bean, reading as if he had a gun to his head:
“The Court of Appeal grants the Home Secretary’s application for permission to appeal against the decision dismissing her application for party status, and further grants the Home Secretary intervenous status in the litigation between the Council and Somani. The Home Secretary has clear statutory duties towards asylum seekers in this country under the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. These include the duty to provide support to them, and their dependents, and to prevent destitution among this cohort.”
The entire video can be watched here:
“Clear statutory duties towards asylum seekers in this country”, implies that the Home Secretary does not have those duties towards the native population.
Naturally, it should come as no surprise that the Lead Judge, Lord Bean, is a long-standing Labour supporter, former treasurer of the Society of Labour Lawyers, and former Chairman of the Fabian Society. What were the odds?
For my money, the salient point of Epping is not that the government was successfully, but that they were prepared regardless to openly defend the rights of (disproportionately) dangerous illegals against the expressed wishes of the British people. Which makes the following impossible to ignore:
- The government already knows about the heightened risk such individuals pose
- They don’t care how many innocent little girls are raped as a consequence
- The only possible conclusion then, is that this government wants this to happen
Nobody sensible wants conflict in Britain. But there are some situations which leave one scant alternative. Starmer’s government is offering us the following Hobson’s choice:
- Cringe, obey, say nothing, and watch your country dismantled, your children raped, and your people made foreigners in their own nation, while you yourself are blamed for it.
- Disobey, speak out, protest, and they will lock you up regardless while continuing to do whatever they want.
Here’s a better question to ask yourself: is it a shock that Reform UK is currently polling at 35%, almost as much as Labour and the Tories combined? Britain it seems is still a two-party system; it’s just that now the establishment position is treachery, while patriotism is a radical alternative.
If you enjoy my work, please consider buying me a coffee – it would really help to keep me going. Thank you!
Frank Haviland is the author of Banalysis: The Lie Destroying the West and The Frank Report, which you should probably subscribe to.
This article (Epping: Labour Declares War on the British People) was created and published by Frank Haviland and is republished here under “Fair Use”
See Related Article Below
Revealed: Epping hotel judge ran socialist think tank linked to Labour
Lord Justice Bean, who has ruled migrants can stay at Essex site, is former chair of Fabian Society
Featured image: Shutterstock
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply