Digital identity: the tagging of human livestock
NIALL MCCRAE
Herding cats would be a futile endeavour, but human beings are a species much more amenable to control. In the neofeudalism of the technocratic new world order, the prospect for the majority of people is a status not of farmhands but livestock. We bipeds will be virtually fenced into our Smart City enclosures, fed whatever synthetic maize Farmer Gates has produced, injected with concoctions from Doctor Gates’ laboratory, and our lives will last only as long as our profitable value. Useless eaters will be sent to Green Pastures, their passing eased by midazolam.
We are being herded, and that has been the masterplan of the predatory elite for centuries. The Enlightenment was always more ideal than real, as the ruling class found ways of giving the populace the sense of being free, while consolidating their power. Nonetheless, philosophers such as John Locke, Voltaire and Rousseau, and the Founding Fathers of the American Revolution, signalled genuine progress of humanity towards a liberal social contract.
Karl Marx had other ideas. The radical firebrand, writing from his safe haven in London under guidance of aristocrat Friedrich Engels, devised a political ideology that would enslave people under pretence of egalitarianism. The revolution that he fomented was not for the benefit of ordinary people. As the Soviet Union and Maoist China showed, the communist system is an uncompromisingly totalitarian form of collectivism.
Communism never appealed to enough voters in the civic democracies of the West. Its inherent atheism, however, was in tune with the withdrawing tide of Christianity, and the ideology appeals to the simplistic notions of social justice among youth. In large areas of Africa and Asia there was no need for communism, because the minions were already collectivised by Islamic theocracy.
The globalist master class realised that people in the West would not be fooled as easily as the peasants of the Russian steppes were over a hundred years ago. The Frankfurt School shifted from Marxist focus on economics to subverting traditional culture, and by stealth cultural Marxism has marched through the institutions.
The tremendous advance of technology inspired another radical movement in the interwar period: technocracy, a system of human governance that would replace political government with scientific management. Popular in academic and corporate sectors in North America, technocracy faded into the background after the Second World War. The post-war decades brought peace and prosperity for a growing middle class, with industries thriving on mass consumerism.
While people were enjoying the fruits of the free market, a new means of collectivisation was in preparation. Instead of the red of communist revolution, the colour would be green. An impending ecological crisis, with human consumption the culprit, was instilled through education and media. Nations, families and individuals tend to put themselves first, but the claimed climate crisis necessitates global control of resources, as guided by the UN Agenda 21 and the seventeen Sustainable Development Goals. The pursuit of Net Zero is a collectivist tyranny.
The problem for the climate alarmists is that ordinary folk do not look out of their windows and see a disaster happening. Indeed, a cursory glance at meteorological records does not indicate any dramatic change in weather patterns, and dire predictions of the Arctic melting and cities drowning in rising sea level have not materialised. A recent opinion poll in the UK showed that almost half of the populace does not believe in a climate emergency, and the proportion is much lower in the USA.
Covid-19, a disturbingly successful scam masterminded by psychopathic globalists, was a sudden collectivist grip. Behavioural psychology was applied throughout the purported pandemic. In the UK, lockdown was preceded by a contrived shortage of toilet rolls, which primed people for removal of basic rights and liberties. Panic-buying was provoked by sensational media stories of greedy shoppers loading trolleys with bulk packs, leaving empty shelves for other customers. This essential commodity was well chosen for a ‘psy-op’. The purpose was to make people want their government to take charge, and to contrast individual selfishness with collective order.
The fear provoked by the authorities led to a psychological condition taking hold of society. Mass formation, as described in Belgian psychotherapist Mattias Desmet’s book The Psychology of Totalitarianism. Is a behavioural disturbance akin to hysteria. First described by Gustave le Bon in 1895, mass formation is a collective delusional belief, typically induced by authoritarian leaders in response to an existential threat.
An outstanding achievement of the Covid-19 regime was to coax or coerce the majority of the global population to take a series of injections. The hubris over the newly-developed vaccines was maintained by an intensive marketing campaign, and by a manipulated ‘them and us’ phenomenon whereby anyone refusing vaccination became a public enemy. Several media personalities were deployed in urging the outcasting of ‘anti-vaxxers’ from society. Digital vaccine passports were introduced, barring entry to various venues for the critical thinkers who saw through the government and Big Pharma lies.
Covid-19 was intended as a short, sharp burst to change society from physical to virtual contact, with all activity on the internet effectively monitored. Businesses went cashless, doctor’s appointments moved online, working from home became the norm, and the temporary closure of pubs, churches and other amenities forced people into communicating on WhatsApp. As declared by Klaus Schwabe, erstwhile leader of the World Economic Forum, we will not go back to the ‘old normal’.
Arguably, the primary purpose of Covid-19 was to introduce digital identity. Vaccine passports were merely a trial phase for this. In the UK, where Starmer announced the introduction of a digital identity system last week, the justification is another type of foreign body: illegal immigrants. Of course, digital identity is not intended to restrict immigration, any more than vaccine passports were to control the spread of a virus. The ‘Great Reset’ is global collectivisation, and digital surveillance is fundamental to the globalists’ design.
How to resist? As I wrote in Green in Tooth and Claw, the overturning of individualism in the West has been achieved by a gradual process of demoralisation. I don’t mean demoralising in its lay usage, but the loss of mores that maintain social structure and culture. Our endeavour, in response, must be remoralisation. David Fleming’s emerging philosophy of continuism is a guide to preserving humanity as we know it, in the face of a technocratic onslaught.
Digital identity is for no other purpose but to control us. It’s the tagging of human beings, treating us like livestock. Herding is for sheep, not for critical thinkers who have read both Nineteen Eighty-Four and Animal Farm.
This article (Digital identity: the tagging of human livestock) was created and published by The Expose and is republished here under “Fair Use”
Leave a Reply