Is the UK’s digital ID a passport to totalitarianism?
LAURA DODSWORTH
‘If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – for ever,’ said O’Brien, the grand inquisitor of the totalitarian regime in Orwell’s futuristic novel 1984.
With the UK government’s announcement of a mandatory digital ID, another Orwell quote risks becoming non-fiction.
There is no democratic mandate for this. It was not in the Labour Party manifesto, and yet here we are.
Tony Blair has been pushing for digital ID for decades. He and his Institute wield an unholy amount of power, and don’t mistake the hard authoritarian bent of their plans. During Covid-19, he said: “Vaccination is your route to liberty. It will be very hard for people to lead a normal life unless they can prove their vaccination status.” That would have been enforced nicely with digital ID wouldn’t it?
Lisa Nandy said on BBC Breakfast this morning that you won’t be fined if you don’t have digital ID, although “you will have a problem if you want to get a new job”. This is all very reminiscent of being told Covid Vaccine Passports wouldn’t be mandatory, except if you wanted to enter a cinema, a supermarket, travel internationally, go to school or to work etcetera etcetera. In other words, if you want to participate in normal economic and civic life you will need a digital ID. Otherwise, you can voluntarily take yourself off to die on a hill.
Digital ID is being introduced now to tackle illegal workers and immigration. But you already need a National Insurance number to work legally in the UK. Black market employers pay in cash — what exactly is going to make them start asking for digital ID? The government’s claims about cracking down on illegal work with digital ID are purely for show. They really think racist flag-shagging gammons are stupid enough to believe digital ID will stop illegal immigration.
And which European countries with digital ID schemes have achieved this? Italy has digital ID and nearly 1 million illegal arrivals by boat since 2015.
There are other levers at our disposal: remove and reduce welfare for illegal immigrants and asylum seekers, and police the Channel. Both are cheaper for the taxpayer and don’t punish citizens. But no, immigration is just the latest excuse authoritarians reach for. They want to issue programmable digital IDs on your phone via a compulsory app. Switch the right to work on or off. The idea that digital ID will stop illegal working is for the birds. Even worse, it could make state control total.
You might think I am exaggerating. Is digital ID so bad? Won’t it be convenient? Maybe. If you’ve got nothing to hide, what’s the problem? Let me explain.
We don’t have to imagine O’Brien’s boot. We can look to China.
The Chinese Social Credit System is a wide-ranging regulatory framework designed to score and incentivise the trustworthiness of individuals and companies. The government rewards or punishes behaviour using real-time monitoring, data gathering and sharing, curates blacklists (punishments) and redlists (rewards). A report in 2019 found 23 million people had been blacklisted from travelling by plane or train due to low social credit scores. In a shocking 2018 example, a student was denied access to university because her father was in debt.
There isn’t a centralised and transparent set of rules; instead, it has been operated locally, but behaviour such as poor driving, spending too long playing video games, or posting fake news can result in low ratings, as well as more serious matters such as not fulfilling court orders.
You won’t find many Chinese critics of the Social Credit System, which is unsurprising given they can be instantly punished.
You’d think this system would unite western commentators in horrified criticism, but it is quite neutrally, even warmly, described by some left-leaning writers and think tanks.
Oh, but we’re not as bad as China, you say. Well, maybe not yet, but we’re getting there.
Consider the UK’s recent history: lockdowns, mask mandates, vaccine mandates that cost over 40,000 care workers their jobs. And the police turning up on doorsteps to question or arrest people about tweets. Just this morning I read an account by Pete North, who was arrested for tweeting a meme which read “Fuck Hamas, Fuck Palestine, Fuck Islam.” I could weep for the state of this country.
Critics, such as civil liberties group Big Brother Watch, have already raised alarms about potential mission creep where digital IDs could eventually link to broader surveillance, including internet data. Imagine a system that can monitor everything you do, track your spending, and limit access based on behaviour. It would be much more efficient to blacklist you for hurty tweets, rather than send plod round. This is not an episode of “Black Mirror” but a realistic peek of the future.
Big Brother Watch also warn digital ID will become a honeypot for hackers. And if not hackers, what about the state’s own incompetence? The government says digital ID, I hear Afghan data breach.
While the new announcements frame digital ID as a tool to make it tougher to work illegally, without mentioning internet restrictions, do you trust them? And if you’ve been living under a rock for the past year and still trust them, do you trust the next government? Should a government have this much control?
In case I have not made the case clearly enough, let me explain what happens when programmable digital ID meets programmable money. If Brit Card and Brit Coin meet and cosy up, they will spawn baby Brit Cage, your totalitarian hell.
Several years ago, the Bank of England called on ministers to decide whether a central bank digital currency (CBDC) should be programmable, essentially giving the issuer complete control over how money is spent. Sir Jon Cunliffe, a deputy governor at the Bank, said:
‘You could think of giving your children pocket money, but programming the money so that it couldn’t be used for sweets. There is a whole range of things that money could do, programmable money, which we cannot do with the current technology.’
The analogy is perfect. Think of your money as being pocket money. Not earnt, yours, to do with as you will, but pocket money to be given, taken away, or otherwise controlled. Imagine your your fuel purchase being restricted if you have spent many carbon credits. Or your ability to travel overseas being turned off if you aren’t up to date with vaccinations. Or your savings expiring in two weeks to boost spending and the economy. The options are almost endless.
O’Brien’s vision was limited only by the technology Orwell perceived at the time. If the State mandates digital ID, your digital footprint will be used to control you. Every step could be monitored, scored, and acted upon. Combined with programmable money, this system could dictate not just what you can buy or where you can travel, but potentially what you can and can’t say, where you can work, and how you live. The UK government is poised to hand itself tools of unprecedented oversight and enforcement. We must resist becoming a checkpoint society in which freedom is rationed by the state.
This article (Brit Card to Brit Cage) was created and published by Laura Dodsworth and is republished here under “Fair Use”
See Related Article Below
Fight against Digital ID with every fibre of your being
A J’accuse Call To Arms
J’ACCUSE
The danger of the next four years is complacency. It is obvious that some pot-banging populist coalition will take power in 2029, no matter how many bogus polls The Nuke posts on X. Even in the worst case scenario for Reform, where tactical voting is used to prevent a full majority, a Tory rump of forty seats will lead to a coalition. Whatever Farage’s issues he will be able to make significant progress in destroying Blairism. The Online Safety Act will be abolished. Freedom of thought and speech will be codified into law. From there, the future is ours for the taking.
The only manoeuvre possible to avert this outcome is now beginning to take shape; state repression against the political right. Starmer and the people around him are using increasingly radicalised language to describe the threat of Reform which go beyond the usual political cut and thrust. Starmer says ‘History will not forgive us if we do not use every ounce of our energy to fight Reform’. He is also already invoking the ‘forces of fascism 80 years ago’.
Starmer and his fanatics have moved from saying that Farage is on the side of paedophiles to comparing him to the Nazis. The derangement would be amusing if the consequences were not so serious.
They have given up ‘addressing concerns’ through faux-robust policy changes (smash the gangs) and are now pitching towards unadulterated ‘anti-fascism’. The arrests of Steve Laws and Pete North are the canaries in the coalmine which signal that this is not just a change in rhetoric but also a change in practice. This is the beginning of a remorseless crackdown on online dissent.
This was all designed years ago by Paul Mason – a close friend and ally of Keir Starmer – who wrote an entire book about how ‘fascism’ can only be defeated (in his words) by the ‘eradicating large amounts of non-existent people and the content generated by them’ – in reference to anonymity online, alongside a wider frenzy of repression.
It’s not just Paul Mason. Remainers are regrouping outside of X on digital ghettoes like BlueSky. The Very Online Left – Stephen Bush, John Oxley – has gone insane. In this tiny echo chamber even the mildest centre-right voices are feverishly abused into silence. Their overall political philosophy aligns with that of Alastair Campbell ranting about ‘sado-populism’; the country is going to the dogs because Musk owns Twitter and it’s about time the State crushed him and silenced his mouthpieces. This is the worldview of the average Labour MP, from the right to the left of the party they are convinced that Farage is a fascist dancing to Putin’s polka.
There will no restraining hand either in the Parliamentary Party or the media as there was at the time of Blair’s manic authoritarianism. Shami Chakrabarti does not care about ‘The Northern Variant’ getting a visit from plod. ‘Anti-fascism’ is why many people on the Left were drawn into politics in the first place. They are all too happy to see Starmer and McSweeney finally take the gloves off.
Understanding this is crucial for appreciating just how grave the threat posed by the new Digital ID system really is, when combined with the wretched Online Safety Act. You will be forced onto this compulsory system and the data it collects will be used by people who think like Paul Mason to crack down on the online right. ‘Dark Starmer’ is coming to fruition. You may well be debanked. These people have failed to win the arguments and are now resorting to state repression to see their political ends achieved. We are at war.
I have written before about the guilt of being an adult at the beginning of the scamdemic, knowing that children were having their lives stolen for them to protect them from a virus which would have no impact on them, being condemned to a lifetime of penury for choices that were made without their consent, by people who could have and should have known better.
I carry this burden despite being an open lockdown sceptic, vaccine refusenik and a gold card carrying member of the Free Speech Union.
I wish I had thrown myself, in March 2020, upon the gears and the levers of the machine. It would have been better to die in a hailstorm of bullets invading a SAGE meeting than to spend the rest of my life avoiding eye contact with anybody born after the turn of the Millennium. How many times can you say sorry? Apologise for their futures which were stolen from them, as you watched passively on.
The only way we can redeem ourselves now is to fight with every part of your being against Starmer’s fascist coup. Struggle against Digital ID with every fibre of your being. The future cannot belong to Paul Mason.
This article (Fight against Digital ID with every fibre of your being) was created and published by J’Accuse and is republished here under “Fair Use”
*****
RELATED
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply