The problem facing the UK and most Western European nations is not simply that of mass migration but that these societies lack a story that could bind people together
FRANK FUREDI
It took a while for the penny to drop but finally UK’s Prime Minister, Keir Starmer has acknowledged the scale of the problem posed by mass migration. He did not quite go far enough. He said that Britain risked becoming an island of strangers when in fact it is already a nation where people feel like they are strangers in their own home. For many decades one opinion poll after another has found that a substantial proportion British people stated that they feel like ‘strangers in their own home’.
According to an opinion poll, published this month by pollsters at More In Common, close to half of the people surveyed indicated that they feel like ‘strangers’ in their own country[i].
The feeling of estrangement from your own country speaks to a sense of cultural loss. For many people the sensibility of loss is highlighted by the appearance of millions of people with whom you have no linguistic or cultural connection in your community.
The sense of loss is highlighted by the perception that the state sanctioned regime of multiculturalism does not assign any special status to the culture that you inherited from your family. Britishness is frequently demonized in the media and those who take seriously the customs and symbols of their nation are often ridiculed in the media.
Above all the sensibility of estrangement that makes many feel that they are spiritually, psychically and culturally homeless is highlighted by the loss of those dimensions of life that can be taken for granted. Communities that possess a system of meaning that can be taken for granted are able to evolve a robust system of trust and solidarity. A common web of meaning rooted within the experience of past generations renders life understandable and enhances people’s sense of ontological security. Regrettably, for millions of people there is far less that they can take for granted than their ancestors. As a result, the sense of cultural insecurity they endure, psychically distances people from one another and from their community. Not everyone suffers from the condition of cultural insecurity, but all members of society are to some extent afflicted by the erosion of the taken for granted dimensions of life.
Mass migration, the institutionalization of multiculturalism and the devaluation of people’s national identity and culture reinforce one another to the point of fostering a climate of estrangement. But the problem is made far worse by the fact that Britain is not simply an Island of Strangers but also an Island Without A Story.
Societies require a unifying story and a widely accepted system of morality. Such a unifying story is the precondition for the emergence of solidarity. The bond of solidarity provides people with a sense of belonging and the feeling that they have a home. It also helps people to develop a sense of meaning about their place in the world. In this way people can go about their life knowing that something important ties them to others.
Solidarity is difficult if not impossible achieve without story that binds people together. Yet for some time now societies have struggled to provide their members with a story that provides them with the sensibility that they belong to a common world. The failure to find an answer to the question of ‘What Does It Mean To be British’ is symptomatic of a society that cannot account for itself. Why? Because decade by decade Britishness has been devalued and demonised by the nation’s institutions of culture and education. These institutions have become devoted to the de-nationalization of people’s identity. At a time when the doctrine of diversity demands the sacralisation of every form identity that of Britishness has been systematically devalued. Is it any surprise that people who feel British have become strangers in their own land?
Britain’s main public institutions now seem embarrassed by any display of patriotism. The arrogant imperial attitudes of the past have given way to a sense of shame about Britain’s history and its present. Those still given to displays of patriotism are marginalised as relics or, worse still, condemned as racists and xenophobes.
An incident involving Emily Thornberry, Labour MP for Islington South, in November 2014 captures well the contempt that significant sections of the British political class have towards displays of patriotism. During a by-election campaign in Rochester, she tweeted a photo of a house displaying three St George’s flags, with a white van parked outside, and accompanied it with the arch caption, ‘Image from #Rochester’. The snobbery was too much for many and, following a public backlash, she was forced to resign from the shadow cabinet. Few believed Labour leader Ed Miliband’s subsequent claims that ‘people should fly the England flag with pride’.
The campaign to turn Britishness into a story of shame
For some time now sections of the Establishment have turned their back on their nation and have encouraged its institutions to distance themselves from Britain’s past. Its cumulative effect has been to strip Britishness of any trace of moral authority. All this has accelerated at tremendous pace during the past decade.
I remember that almost a decade ago – in August 2015 – during the course of an interview with The Times I noted that there were very few moments in British history that were allowed to serve as a source of pride. At the time I stated that there was one exception:
‘The Second World War was the last time Britain had a story about its accomplishments about which it could feel unambiguously proud. It is also one of the few historical experiences which is not very divisive — it does not divide people left and right.”[ii]
Today this statement no longer corresponds to reality. The past decade has seen a systematic attempt to blemish Britain’s role in World War Two and young people’s pride in what their nation achieved at the time has severely diminished.
Pride in Britain’s important role in defeating Nazi Germany during World War Two is now countered by the claims that downsize this nation’s contribution to the Allies victory. ‘Britain has built a national myth on winning the Second World War, but it’s distorting our politics’, argues one commentator in The New Statesman.[iii] There is a veritable industry devoted to dispelling the conviction that Britain played a unique and historically significant role during World War Two. David Edgerton, in his ‘The Nationalisation of British History: Historians, Nationalism and the Myths of 1940’, decries the idea that Britain ‘stood alone’.[iv] He seems to suggest that a version of history that has served as a source of pride in the post-Second World War era is more or less a myth. If these critics are to be believed, just about everything associated with the pre-existing social memory of this War is a myth, and there is very little left in this story that can serve as a source of national pride.
The project of corroding people’s pride in their nation’s past has serious implications for everyday life. If people are dispossessed of their nation’s story it becomes difficult for them – especially they young – to answer the question of who they are. At present Britain is fast becoming an island without a story and for that reason even if it was not subjected to the difficulties posed by mass migration it would still be an island of strangers.
Of course, people’s sense of spiritual homelessness and a politicised regime of mass migration are connected. The idealogues of multiculturalism have sought to undermine the consciousness of belonging to a nation and the identity attached to it. Which is why it is not too soon to unapologetically promote pride in Britishness
[i] https://news.sky.com/story/people-do-feel-like-strangers-in-britain-but-its-not-just-because-of-migration-polling-finds-13369073
[ii] https://www.thetimes.com/comment/register/article/dont-mention-the-war-again-for-70-years-beg-historians-02bcs7c6jhw
[iii] https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2017/08/britain-has-built-national-myth-winning-second-world-war-it-s-distorting-our
[iv] Edgerton (2021) The nationalisation of British history: historians, nationalism and the myths of 1940. The English Historical Review, 136(581), pp.950-985.
This article (An Island of Strangers or an Island Without a Story) was created and published by Frank Furedi and is republished here under “Fair Use”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply