Acid Attacks on Women and Children

The elite have devoted themselves to undermining borders, the rules of law, the safety of women and children and the way of life of decent law-abiding people.

LAURA PERRINS

(From the 3rd of Feb 2024. Following a run of attacks in recent days, I remembered this horrific attack in 2024. I re-run this piece as I think it is still relevant and it is necessary to ask, for how long is this going to go on for?)

In Saturday’s Times, there was a handy how to guide, of what to do should you find yourself a victim of an acid attack. “What to do in an acid attack: three immediate steps to take.”

That’s lovely, to have to know that in Britain 2024 that “administering quick first aid is crucial in the event of an acid, alkaline or corrosive substance attack.” This advice comes after the horrific acid attack on a mother and her two daughters in Clapham last week. I didn’t really want to talk about this, as others have done such a good job, but I was too angry not to.

The mother and her two daughters were attacked in the most brutal manner possible by a one Abdul Shakoor Ezedi.

On Saturday the Telegraph reported that ‘the 31-year-old mother, believed to be known to Ezedi, was attacked with a corrosive alkaline substance and remains “very poorly” and sedated in hospital, with her injuries thought to be “life-changing”. Lord, have mercy.

As the handy how to guide in the Times explains, “The severity of the damage depends on the concentration of the acid and how quickly it is washed off with water. In some cases, the skull may be deformed and ear cartilage burned off. Inhalation of the acid vapours can also cause breathing problems.” Also “the attacks often result in permanent damage including lifelong scarring, with many victims requiring multiple surgeries to recover. Attacks with corrosive substances are often aimed at the face, meaning they can affect the eyes and cause blindness. Most survivors are women and girls.”

We are also told by the Times that “A bystander who suffered injuries in the south London chemical attack has described how she had “never witnessed anything so horrific in my life”.

The bystander Rachael, who displayed immense courage in going to the incident, said “I realised that the mum, her entire face was covered with the liquid and I knew it was some sort of acid or something.” Bearing in mind the handy ‘how to guide’ we can assume the mother will never be the same again after this attack. This woman will never, ever be the same again.

We can only pray for this poor woman and her traumatised children who were eight and three years of age. For the decision makers who put her attacker, Abdul Shakoor Ezedi, on the streets of Clapham we must reserve our red hot anger. And I encourage you to be red hot in your anger and absolute disgust with these people. If you are not, there is something morally wrong with you.

Let’s get back to Abdul Shakoor Ezedi, shall we.

Matthew Goodwin in his excellent piece explains: In 2016, Abdul Shakoor Ezedi entered Britain illegally from Afghanistan in a lorry. (This is the same as the Uxbridge attack last week on Wayne Broadhurst, Nov 2025. Safi Dawood also entered illegally and was granted leave to remain.)

He then applied for asylum, twice, and was turned down on both occasions.

Was he then removed from Britain?

Nope. He stayed in the country.

In 2018, Ezedi then went on to commit a sexual assault and indecent exposure.

What happened then?

He was given a suspended sentence, meaning he did not go to jail.

What happened after that?

Well, having already been convicted of a serious crime, Abdul Ezedi then applied for asylum for a third time.

This time he was … successful.

Why?

Because now he claimed he was “a Christian”, which was endorsed by a priest.

And there we have it. What this amounts to is a veritable army of do-gooders who have put this man on the street, a man free to get from Newcastle all the way to Clapham to douse a mother and her two daughters with acid.

Abdul Ezedi should not have been on the streets of Britain five times over.

Abdul Ezedi should not have been in Britain because you should not be able to cross a border in a lorry, illegally. That’s 1.

Abdul Ezedi should not have been on the streets of Clapham because he was denied asylum. That’s 2.

Abdul Ezedi should not have been on the streets of Clapham because he was denied asylum for a second time. That’s 3.

Abdul Ezedi should not have been on the streets of Clapham because he then committed a sexual offence and should have been jailed, but he received a suspended sentence instead. Of course he did. That’s 4.

Abdul Ezedi should not have been on the streets of Clapham because after his conviction for the sexual offence any normal country would see him deported. But he wasn’t because the deportation regime doesn’t trigger for a suspended sentence, it was reported. But even it was triggered, we know Abdul Ezedi would not have been deported because some immigration/human rights lawyers would have said deporting him was mean and nasty and in breach of his family life, or some such garbage. That’s 5.

Then the priest came along, and reading his Bible found that it said, Happy are those who commit sex offences and break into countries illegally, their’s should be the Kingdom of Heaven, yes let me swear to the fact that Abdul Ezedi is now a Christian.

Wow, I feel so good about myself right now. Ta-day Abdul Ezedi now has asylum! Of course he does, because the lunatics are running the bloody asylum.

So all of this mean, all of this do-gooding, by these idiots, by these absolute morons means there is a mother lying in hospital in London right now with horrific burns to her face that she will never recover from.

I bet the priest is fine. I bet the judge who gave the suspended sentence is a-ok. The person who granted him asylum is could be sipping a coffee right now. Bet their kids are fine, their kids were not ripped from a car, thrown to the ground and will now suffer from PTSD for the REST OF THEIR LIVES.

The worst thing about Luxury Belief Class, as Goodwin says again, is their sense of moral superiority. They have nothing, absolutely nothing to feel superior about. They have devoted themselves to undermining borders, the rules of law, the safety of women and children and the way of life of decent law-abiding people. These elite should be shunned and shamed wherever they go. This is an all-out attack on the law abiding majority of Britons. I’m angry. And you should be too.

---

This article (Acid attacks on women and children) was created and published by Laura Perrins and is republished here under “Fair Use”

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.