WHO ELSE is “advising”, freaking out and leading up the garden path to national destruction our not-0verly-bright government?
by Steve Cook
A close advisor of the government during this whole COVID19 fiasco has been the discredited professor, Neil Ferguson, renowned for the catastrophic inaccuracy of his mathematical modelling concerning several prior epidemics.
This has prompted large numbers of concerned citizens to question why the hell the government acted on advice from this moron, as Elon Musk has called him.
It marks the government as slightly dim and highly credulous to say the least – unless of course the government has an agenda that makes it desirable to prefer this fool’s alarmist advice over that of people more sensible.
But this got me wondering WHO ELSE is “advising”, freaking out and leading up the garden path to national destruction our not-0verly-bright government?
So I found out that there is an advisory group known as SAGE that has been the government’s main source of advice during the crisis. Here is SAGE’s WIKIPEDIA ENTRY if you want to look them up.
The Wikipedia entry includes this fascinating line, “The Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) is a UK governmental advisory body that advises central government in emergencies. During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, SAGE was criticised for a lack of transparency. For their security and safety, and on advice from the Centre for the Protection of National Infrastructure, the list of current members is not disclosed.”
The secrecy thing rang alarm bells. Why so secretive? Why does the government not want the public to know who is giving it advice? Would it not be better that we DO know exactly who is guiding our own government? Is there something to hide?
So, in the wake of other scandals concerning vested interests within the government (Chris Whitty, Hancock , Ferguson’s Imperial College taking funds from Gates etc) I wondered, are there any other conflicts or potential conflicts of interest here?
Oh dear God, yes there are! SAGE is riddled with them to a degree far greater than I was expecting.
Fortunately, the Wikipedia entry included, “A report in The Guardian stated that attendees at an April 2020 meeting of the group included:
- Sir Patrick Vallance, Chief Scientific Adviser (chair)
- Professor Chris Whitty, Chief Medical Adviser
Medical and scientific experts:
- Professor John Aston, statistician, Chief Scientific Adviser to the Home Office
- Meera Chand, microbiologist
- Sir Ian Diamond, National Statistician
- Professor John Edmunds, epidemiologist
- Sir Jeremy Farrar, medical researcher
- Professor Neil Ferguson, epidemiologist
- Professor Peter Horby, epidemiologist
- Professor Angela McLean, mathematical biologist
- Professor Graham Medley, epidemiologist
- Dr Edward Mullins, clinical adviser
- Professor Sharon Peacock, microbiologist
- Professor Stephen Powis, national medical director for England
- Professor Andrew Rambaut, molecular biologist
- Emma Reed, emergency planner
- Professor Brooke Rogers, social psychologist
- James Rubin, psychologist
- Professor Jonathan Van-Tam, influenza specialist, Deputy Chief Medical Officer for England
- Professor Charlotte Watts, epidemiologist, Chief Scientific Advisor to the Department for International Development
- Professor Maria Zambon, virologist
If you pull a string on the members of this panel, you find something interesting (and please note that for the purposes of this brief article, I am NOT including links to the pharmaceutical industry).
So here goes (and these approximations in fact embrace virtually THE ENTIRE PANEL:
- Several members are from Oxford University – which received funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- At least two are from Imperial College London – which received funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Several are from Kings College London – which received funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- At least one is from the University of Aberdeen – which received funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- At least two are from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical medicine – which received funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Several from University College London – which received funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- One from the University of Edinburgh – which received funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- One from the University of Liverpool – which received funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
None of this necessarily proves any wrong doing on the part of any of SAGE’s members but knowing the Gates’ massive multi-billion dollar investment in pharmaceuticals and vaccines, their vested interest in whipping up a suitably scary epidemic to boost sales and the potential leverage that their “philanthropic”funding gives them over the recipient, we concerned citizens have a right to be seriously concerned as to the impartiality of the advice by which our government is being influenced.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.